Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Feb;49(2):184.e1-184.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of infection after conversion from external fixation (EF) to internal fixation (IF) of distal radius fractures and to evaluate the relationship between infection and secondary variables, including time to conversion from EF to IF, internal hardware overlapping EF pin sites, and definitive fixation with a dorsal-spanning bridge plate.
A retrospective review was performed at 2 level 1 trauma centers including all patients aged ≥18 years from 2006 to 2019 with a distal radius fracture treated initially with EF followed by subsequent IF. The patients were excluded from analysis if they had <10 weeks of clinical follow-up, a history of prior distal radius surgery, or evidence of infection before EF to IF conversion. Patient demographic data, mechanism of injury, presence of hardware overlapping pin sites, and timing to definitive fixation were obtained from the medical records. Infection was defined as positive intraoperative cultures or documented return to the operating room for debridement after IF.
A total of 64 fractures in 61 patients with a median age of 50 years (range, 18-75 years) were included. Infections developed in 6 patients (6 of 64 fractures). The incidence of infection was higher in patients with a time to conversion from EF to IF of >14 days (infection in 2 of 5 patients vs 4 of 59 patients). The incidence of infection was similar in patients with and without hardware overlapping EF pin sites (3 of 27 vs 3 of 37, respectively).
Infections occurred in 6 of 64 distal radius fractures following conversion from EF to IF, and delay in conversion of >14 days was associated with an increased infection risk.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
本研究旨在报告桡骨远端骨折由外固定(EF)转为内固定(IF)后感染的发生率,并评估感染与二次变量之间的关系,包括从 EF 转为 IF 的时间、内置物与 EF 针道重叠、以及使用背侧跨越桥接钢板进行确定性固定。
在 2 个 1 级创伤中心进行回顾性研究,纳入 2006 年至 2019 年所有年龄≥18 岁、最初接受 EF 治疗随后接受 IF 治疗的桡骨远端骨折患者。如果患者的临床随访时间<10 周、有桡骨远端手术史或 EF 转为 IF 前有感染证据,则将其排除在分析之外。从病历中获取患者的人口统计学数据、损伤机制、内置物与针道重叠情况以及确定性固定的时间。感染定义为 IF 后术中培养阳性或有记录返回手术室清创。
共纳入 61 例 64 处骨折的患者,中位年龄为 50 岁(范围,18-75 岁)。6 例(64 处骨折中的 6 例)患者发生感染。EF 转为 IF 的时间>14 天的患者感染发生率更高(5 例中有 2 例感染,59 例中有 4 例感染)。EF 针道与内置物重叠的患者与无内置物重叠的患者感染发生率相似(27 例中有 3 例感染,37 例中有 3 例感染)。
在 64 处桡骨远端骨折由 EF 转为 IF 后,有 6 处发生感染,>14 天的转换延迟与感染风险增加相关。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性 IV 级。