Kamil Robert, McKenna Elise, Romeo Paul, Burke Orett, Zakusylo Anna, Andemichael Aman, Badalyan Nicole, Stamos Thomas, Shah Ajul, Katt Brian M
Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA.
Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 11;16(7):e64346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64346. eCollection 2024 Jul.
There are numerous internal fixation (IF) options available for distal radius fractures (DRFs). The choice of fixation method depends on factors such as fracture morphology, soft tissue integrity, the patient's clinical status, and the surgeon's training. While volar plate fixation has become the primary approach for addressing these fractures, alternative IF methods like K-wire fixation, fragment-specific fixation, and dorsal bridge plating continue to be effective. Despite the versatility of IF, there are certain clinical situations where prompt and conclusive management through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is not suitable. These instances include the treatment of polytraumatized patients, individuals with compromised soft tissues, or those medically unstable to tolerate lengthy anesthesia. In such cases, proficiency in closed reduction and external fixation (EF) proves invaluable. Being able to identify these clinical scenarios and comprehend the efficacy and safety of EF in addressing DRFs is valuable for any surgeon handling such injuries.
对于桡骨远端骨折(DRF),有多种内固定(IF)选择。固定方法的选择取决于骨折形态、软组织完整性、患者的临床状况以及外科医生的培训等因素。虽然掌侧钢板固定已成为治疗这些骨折的主要方法,但诸如克氏针固定、骨折块特异性固定和背侧桥式钢板固定等替代内固定方法仍然有效。尽管内固定具有多功能性,但在某些临床情况下,通过切开复位内固定(ORIF)进行迅速而确切的处理并不合适。这些情况包括多发伤患者、软组织受损的个体或因医学原因无法耐受长时间麻醉的患者。在这种情况下,熟练掌握闭合复位和外固定(EF)就显得至关重要。能够识别这些临床情况并理解外固定在治疗桡骨远端骨折中的疗效和安全性,对于任何处理此类损伤的外科医生来说都是很有价值的。