• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回应法庭上的神经多样性:环境适应措施以提高程序公正性的简要评估。

Responding to neurodiversity in the courtroom: A brief evaluation of environmental accommodations to increase procedural fairness.

机构信息

Department of Sociological Studies, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Crim Behav Ment Health. 2022 Jun;32(3):197-211. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2239. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1002/cbm.2239
PMID:35932097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9540328/
Abstract

Recent research has highlighted that a high prevalence of young adults who have various forms of neurodivergence come into contact with the criminal justice system. Currently, many courts are not designed to respond to neurological differences often seen in young people who engage with them. The aim of this study was to identify ways to make locality courts more accessible, engaging, and ultimately more responsive to neurodivergence. A panel of neurodivergence specialists reviewed the general district courtroom environment of a new specialised young adult list court in Aotearoa New Zealand to identify potential barriers to accessibility and to highlight areas for improvement. The methodology involved naturalistic observation of a typical morning in the courtroom. We identified a series of recommendations with the potential to improve the court experience and increase access to justice for neurodivergent young adults. This study identified specific need for neurodiversity education and screening within the court environment.

摘要

最近的研究强调,大量具有各种形式神经多样性的年轻人会接触到刑事司法系统。目前,许多法院的设计并未考虑到与他们接触的年轻人中常见的神经差异。本研究旨在确定使地方法院更具可及性、吸引力,并最终对神经多样性更具响应性的方法。一组神经多样性专家审查了新西兰奥特亚罗瓦一个新的专门青年名单法院的普通地区法庭环境,以确定无障碍性的潜在障碍,并突出需要改进的领域。该方法涉及对法庭内典型早晨的自然观察。我们提出了一系列建议,有可能改善法院的体验并为神经多样性的年轻成年人增加诉诸司法的机会。这项研究确定了在法院环境中进行神经多样性教育和筛查的具体需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b3/9540328/2f0f794deb01/CBM-32-197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b3/9540328/2f0f794deb01/CBM-32-197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b3/9540328/2f0f794deb01/CBM-32-197-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Responding to neurodiversity in the courtroom: A brief evaluation of environmental accommodations to increase procedural fairness.回应法庭上的神经多样性:环境适应措施以提高程序公正性的简要评估。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2022 Jun;32(3):197-211. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2239. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Neurodivergence-informed therapy.神经多样性启发式治疗。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023 Mar;65(3):310-317. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15384. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
Nga Whenu Raranga/Weaving Strands in the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court of Aotearoa/New Zealand.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦酒精及其他药物治疗法庭中的 Nga Whenu Raranga/编织线索
J Law Med. 2018 Apr;25(3):727-740.
4
Criminal justice system interactions among young adults with and without autism: A national birth cohort study in New Zealand.自闭症和非自闭症青年成年人的刑事司法系统交互:新西兰全国出生队列研究。
Autism. 2022 Oct;26(7):1783-1794. doi: 10.1177/13623613211065541. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
5
A rapid systematic review of what we know about alcohol use disorders and brief interventions in the criminal justice system.对我们所了解的酒精使用障碍及刑事司法系统中的简短干预措施进行的快速系统综述。
Int J Prison Health. 2016;12(1):57-70. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-08-2015-0024.
6
Court diversion in perspective.透视下的法庭分流。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun-Jul;40(6-7):529-38. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01835.x.
7
Questioning fairness: the relationship of mental health and psychopathic characteristics with young offenders' perceptions of procedural justice and legitimacy.质疑公平性:心理健康和精神病态特征与青少年罪犯对程序正义和合法性认知之间的关系
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Oct;27(4):354-370. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2004. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
8
Supporting young people's cognition and communication in the courtroom: A scoping review of current practices.支持年轻人在法庭上的认知和交流:当前实践的范围综述。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2022 Jun;32(3):175-196. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2237. Epub 2022 May 19.
9
Trust and Confidence in Media and Criminal Justice Institutions.对媒体和刑事司法机构的信任与信心。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Sep;63(12):2213-2233. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19845784. Epub 2019 May 12.
10
COVID-19 related factors affecting the experiences of neurodivergent persons in the workplace: A rapid review.与 COVID-19 相关的因素对工作场所中神经多样性个体体验的影响:快速综述。
Work. 2022;71(1):3-12. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210811.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Criminal Justice System Interactions in Young Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Findings From a National Birth Cohort.注意缺陷多动障碍青少年与刑事司法系统交互作用的风险:来自全国性出生队列的研究结果。
J Atten Disord. 2023 Oct;27(12):1332-1342. doi: 10.1177/10870547231177469. Epub 2023 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief Report: Sentencing Outcomes for Offenders on the Autism Spectrum.简要报告:自闭症谱系罪犯的判决结果。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jul;52(7):3314-3320. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05212-4. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Transformative equality: Court accommodations for South African citizens with severe communication disabilities.变革性平等:为南非严重沟通障碍公民提供的法庭便利措施
Afr J Disabil. 2020 Apr 1;9:651. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v9i0.651. eCollection 2020.
3
Mood Disorders in High-Functioning Autism: The Importance of Alexithymia and Emotional Regulation.
高功能自闭症中的情绪障碍:述情障碍和情绪调节的重要性。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Jul;49(7):2935-2945. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04020-1.
4
Multi-Level, Multi-Component Approaches to Community Based Interventions for Healthy Living-A Three Case Comparison.基于社区的健康生活干预措施的多层次、多组件方法——三案例比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Oct 20;13(10):1023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13101023.
5
Research design issues for evaluating complex multicomponent interventions in neighborhoods and communities.评估社区和邻里复杂多成分干预措施的研究设计问题。
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Mar;6(1):153-9. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0358-4.
6
Adolescent maturity and the brain: the promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy.青少年成熟与大脑:神经科学研究在青少年健康政策中的前景与陷阱
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Sep;45(3):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.016.
7
How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of 'expert' within Delphi panel techniques.专家有多专业?对德尔菲法中“专家”概念的探究。
Nurse Res. 2006;14(1):59-70. doi: 10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010.
8
Knowledge of legal terminology and court proceedings in adults with developmental disabilities.发育障碍成年人的法律术语和法庭程序知识。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Oct;25(5):529-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1012896916825.