Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.P., M.D., N.C.), New York, New York, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.P., M.D., N.C.), New York, New York, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/New York Eye & Ear, Eye and Vision Research Institute (M.D., N.C.), New York, New York, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;243:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.07.026. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
Numerous studies have emphasized the influence of gender-specific mentors in medical students' career decisions, but this has not been explored fully in ophthalmology. Therefore, this study evaluated ophthalmology educators' attitudes toward female mentorship, to better understand how this may relate to medical students' career development and training.
Cross-sectional study.
A 22-question survey was sent to Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) chairs, program directors (PDs), and medical student educators (MSEs). The number of female students applying to ophthalmology residency was compared to the number of female ophthalmology faculty using AUPO and Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) workforce data. Student t tests and χ were used for analyses, all at a threshold significance level of P <.05.
75 members responded, including 30 of 72 MSEs (41.7%), 34 of 114 PDs (29.8%), and 17 of 135 chairs (12.6%). Of respondents, 55.4% identified as female and 44.6% as male. Male and female members had 47.9% and 47.6% female mentees, respectively (P = .45). However, 21.2% of male versus 56.1% of female members agreed that a mentee of the same gender was important (P < .01). Furthermore, 13 of 40 female members (32.5%) reported having a significant female mentor themselves vs 1 of 29 male members (3%) (P < .01).
Male and female AUPO members reported no difference in female mentees, but females were more likely to feel gender-specific mentorship was important, suggesting room for further development of this resource. Expansion of female mentorship in ophthalmology can promote equity in training and help address the lack of female representation in leadership.
许多研究强调了医学专业学生职业决策中性别特定导师的影响,但在眼科学领域尚未对此进行充分探讨。因此,本研究评估了眼科学教育者对女性指导的态度,以更好地了解这可能与医学学生的职业发展和培训有何关系。
横断面研究。
向大学眼科教授协会 (AUPO) 主席、项目主任 (PD) 和医学学生教育者 (MSE) 发送了一份包含 22 个问题的调查。使用 AUPO 和美国医学协会 (AAMC) 劳动力数据比较申请眼科学住院医师的女学生人数与女眼科学教师人数。使用学生 t 检验和 χ²进行分析,所有分析的显著水平阈值均为 P <.05。
75 名成员做出了回应,其中包括 72 名 MSE 中的 30 名(41.7%)、114 名 PD 中的 34 名(29.8%)和 135 名主席中的 17 名(12.6%)。在回应者中,55.4%为女性,44.6%为男性。男性和女性成员分别有 47.9%和 47.6%的女性被指导者(P =.45)。然而,21.2%的男性成员认为与被指导者性别相同很重要,而 56.1%的女性成员持相同观点(P <.01)。此外,40 名女性成员中有 13 名(32.5%)报告自己有一位重要的女性导师,而 29 名男性成员中只有 1 名(3%)(P <.01)。
AUPO 的男性和女性成员报告称其女性被指导者人数没有差异,但女性更有可能认为性别特定的指导很重要,这表明可以进一步开发这一资源。扩大眼科学领域的女性指导可以促进培训中的公平性,并有助于解决领导层中女性代表性不足的问题。