MSD Animal Health Benelux, Department of Ruminant Health, Brussels, Belgium.
MSD Animal Health Benelux, Department of Ruminant Health, Brussels, Belgium.
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Oct;207:105729. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105729. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
The aim of the current study was to assess the diagnostic characteristics of radial immunodiffusion (RID), capillary electrophoresis (CE) and digital brix refractometry (Bx) for the diagnosis of failure of passive transfer (FPT) of immunity in neonatal Belgian Blue beef calves in the absence of a gold standard using a Bayesian latent class model. Belgian blue beef calves (n = 202) from a large farm in the south of Belgium were blood-sampled at 48-72 h of age and tested for FPT. The true prevalence of FPT in this population of calves was 34.5 % (95 % BCI: 26.1-44.3) using a FPT cut-off point of 10 g IgG/L. This true prevalence increased to 66.3 (95 % BCI: 56.9-74.8) and 88.9 % (95 % BCI: 83.1-93.2) at FPT cut-off points of respectively 18 and 25 g IgG/L serum. The Bland-Altman plot comparing the RID and CE methods, revealed that the serum IgG concentrations obtained by RID were on average 2.25 (95 % CI 1.62-2.88) g/L higher than those measured by CE. Optimal cut-off values for CE, corresponding to the FPT values as measured by RID of 10, 18, and 25 g IgG/L serum, were respectively 10, 15, and 20 g IgG/L. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the three diagnostic tests was comparable at the FPT cut-off point of 10 g IgG/L serum (i.e. 85 %). At higher cut-off points for FPT, the RID and CE assays presumably performed better that the Bx method. In conclusion, we demonstrated that: (1) the CE method is a good alternative for the RID assay, the latter having important constraints when considering its practicality, and (2) the Bx method is a cheap and user-friendly indirect method to evaluate the FPT in new-born Belgian Blue beef calves.
本研究旨在评估在没有金标准的情况下,使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型,评估用于诊断新生比利时蓝比牛肉犊被动免疫失败(FPT)的放射免疫扩散(RID)、毛细管电泳(CE)和数字比折射计(Bx)的诊断特征。在比利时南部的一个大型农场中,对 202 头比利时蓝比牛肉犊在 48-72 小时龄时进行采血,并对 FPT 进行检测。使用 10 g IgG/L 的 FPT 截断值,该人群中 FPT 的真实患病率为 34.5%(95%BCI:26.1-44.3)。当 FPT 截断值分别为 18 和 25 g IgG/L 血清时,该真实患病率分别增加到 66.3(95%BCI:56.9-74.8)和 88.9%(95%BCI:83.1-93.2)。RID 和 CE 方法的 Bland-Altman 图显示,RID 获得的血清 IgG 浓度平均比 CE 测量的高 2.25(95%CI 1.62-2.88)g/L。CE 的最佳截断值与 RID 测量的 10、18 和 25 g IgG/L 血清的 FPT 值相对应,分别为 10、15 和 20 g IgG/L。在 FPT 截断值为 10 g IgG/L 血清时,三种诊断测试的整体诊断准确性相当(即 85%)。在更高的 FPT 截断值下,RID 和 CE 检测法可能比 Bx 方法表现更好。总之,我们证明:(1)CE 方法是 RID 检测法的良好替代品,后者在考虑其实用性时具有重要的局限性;(2)Bx 方法是一种廉价且易于使用的间接方法,可用于评估新生比利时蓝比牛肉犊的 FPT。