• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人高致死性和低致死性自杀企图有何区别?系统评价和荟萃分析。

What distinguishes high and low-lethality suicide attempts in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

University of East Anglia, UK.

University of East Anglia, UK.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Oct;154:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.048. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.048
PMID:35933859
Abstract

Those making suicide attempts with highly lethal medical consequences are arguably the best proxy for those who die by suicide and represent a qualitatively different population from those making lower lethality attempts. Different factors influence the likelihood of a suicide attempt occurring and the lethality of that attempt. Both are important dimensions of risk. Older adults represent a distinct group in suicide research with unique risk factors that influence the lethality of their suicide attempts. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises factors distinguishing those making high and low-lethality suicide attempts in older adulthood. Databases PsycINFO, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and CINAHL were systematically searched with seven of 1182 unique records included. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted on 18 variables in addition to a narrative synthesis regarding executive function. Only increased suicidal intent and planning meaningfully distinguished high from low-lethality attempters in meta-analyses. A large effect size was additionally observed for white ethnicity. Diminished alcohol use disorder prevalence and depression severity, and greater cognitive impairment, may be associated with high lethality attempters but further research is needed. Age and gender were not associated with lethality, contrary to adult populations. A narrative synthesis of studies exploring differences in executive functioning suggested high-lethality attempters were less likely to impulsively act on suicidal urges, allowing them to better plan suicide attempts that are more lethal, and are less likely to alter suicidal plans. Key limitations were that meta-analyses were underpowered to detect small effect sizes, and samples were largely white and limited to the USA.

摘要

那些试图自杀且造成严重医疗后果的人可以说是自杀身亡者的最佳代表,他们与试图实施低致命性自杀的人在性质上有所不同。不同的因素会影响自杀企图发生的可能性及其致命性。这两者都是风险的重要维度。老年人在自杀研究中是一个独特的群体,他们有独特的风险因素,影响他们自杀企图的致命性。本系统评价和荟萃分析总结了区分老年人高、低致命性自杀企图的因素。系统地检索了 PsycINFO、PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库,纳入了 1182 个独特记录中的 7 个。除了对执行功能进行叙述性综合分析外,还对 18 个变量进行了随机效应荟萃分析。仅在荟萃分析中,自杀意图和计划的增加有意义地区分了高致命性和低致命性企图者。还观察到白种人种族的效应量较大。酒精使用障碍的患病率和抑郁严重程度降低,以及认知障碍增加,可能与高致命性企图者有关,但需要进一步研究。与成年人群体相反,年龄和性别与致命性无关。对探索执行功能差异的研究进行叙述性综合分析表明,高致命性企图者不太可能冲动地实施自杀冲动,使他们能够更好地计划更致命的自杀企图,并且不太可能改变自杀计划。主要限制是荟萃分析的效力不足以检测小效应量,而且样本主要是白人,且仅限于美国。

相似文献

1
What distinguishes high and low-lethality suicide attempts in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人高致死性和低致死性自杀企图有何区别?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Oct;154:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.048. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
4
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年抑郁症的新一代抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Progressive resistive exercise interventions for adults living with HIV/AIDS.针对感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的成年人的渐进性抗阻运动干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD004248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004248.pub2.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.

引用本文的文献

1
Delineating impulsivity-based pathways to suicide deaths: A cluster analysis.描绘基于冲动性的自杀死亡途径:一项聚类分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 11;68(1):e114. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10070.
2
Network Analysis of Psychopathological Dimensions in Patients with and Without Suicidal Ideation.有自杀意念和无自杀意念患者心理病理维度的网络分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;15(7):946. doi: 10.3390/bs15070946.
3
Temporal trends in suicide related emergency calls by age group and gender from 2014 to 2023.2014年至2023年按年龄组和性别划分的自杀相关紧急呼叫的时间趋势。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):25737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07700-4.
4
Efficacy of a brief psychological intervention for adolescents with recent suicide attempt: A randomized clinical trial.针对近期有自杀未遂行为青少年的简短心理干预的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 10;68(1):e110. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10065.
5
Identifying and characterizing suicide decedent subtypes using deep embedded clustering.使用深度嵌入聚类识别和表征自杀死亡者亚型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23069. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07007-4.
6
Objective and subjective suicidal intent are differentially associated with attempt lethality based on age of onset of suicidal behavior.基于自杀行为开始的年龄,客观和主观自杀意图与自杀未遂的致死性存在不同关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 15;15(1):5621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89844-x.
7
Bibliometric and visual analysis of suicide in aged people over the past 20 years.过去20年老年人自杀的文献计量学与可视化分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 24;16:1469853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1469853. eCollection 2025.
8
Personality Dimension, Suicidal Intent, and Lethality: A Cross-sectional Study of Suicide Attempters with or Without Personality Disorders.人格维度、自杀意图与致死性:一项针对有无人格障碍的自杀未遂者的横断面研究。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Nov 15:02537176241287161. doi: 10.1177/02537176241287161.
9
Characteristics of Single vs. Multiple Suicide Attempters Among Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单一致伤与多次自杀未遂成人患者特征的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):769-791. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01461-5. Epub 2023 Sep 23.