School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Sep;148:105897. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105897. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
The majority of cardioembolic strokes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are resulted from clot formation in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Current stroke risk stratification is based on the overall risks estimated from demographic and clinical profiles but not on individual anatomy or physiology. We aim to explore the differences in LAA morphological and hemodynamic parameters by comparing patients with and without a stroke history. Thirty-nine patients with persistent NVAF were included. Of these, 17 patients without a stroke history (non-stroke group) were compared with 22 patients with a history of stroke (stroke group). Their LAA geometric models were first reconstructed, and the morphological parameters were then measured. Furthermore, their LAA hemodynamic parameters were calculated by fluid-structure interaction analysis. Moreover, particle residual rates (PRR) and blood renewal rates (BRR) analyses were also employed to characterize the thrombogenesis dynamics. The results showed that compared to the non-stroke group, the stroke group had significant smaller LAA tortuosity and LAA orifice area, and significantly lower LAA orifice velocities (0.16 ± 0.10 vs 0.15 ± 0.06 cm/s; p = 0.044), but higher PRR (14.58 ± 9.43 vs 9.25 ± 4.67; p = 0.040) and BRR (52.41 ± 18.11 vs 38.36 ± 24.07; p = 0.044). These LAA morphological and hemodynamic parameters may be used to assess stroke risk in patients with NVAF.
大多数非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的心源性脑栓塞是由于左心耳(LAA)内血栓形成所致。目前的卒中风险分层是基于从人口统计学和临床特征估计的总体风险,但不是基于个体解剖结构或生理学。我们旨在通过比较有和无卒中病史的患者,探讨 LAA 形态和血流动力学参数的差异。共纳入 39 例持续性 NVAF 患者。其中,17 例无卒中病史(非卒中组)与 22 例有卒中病史(卒中组)进行比较。首先重建他们的 LAA 几何模型,然后测量形态参数。此外,通过流固耦合分析计算他们的 LAA 血流动力学参数。还进行了颗粒残留率(PRR)和血液更新率(BRR)分析,以表征血栓形成动力学。结果表明,与非卒中组相比,卒中组的 LAA 扭曲度和 LAA 口面积较小,LAA 口速度较低(0.16 ± 0.10 vs 0.15 ± 0.06 cm/s;p = 0.044),但 PRR(14.58 ± 9.43 vs 9.25 ± 4.67;p = 0.040)和 BRR(52.41 ± 18.11 vs 38.36 ± 24.07;p = 0.044)较高。这些 LAA 形态和血流动力学参数可用于评估 NVAF 患者的卒中风险。