• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用动态压痕法对美学正畸托槽进行力学特性表征。

Mechanical characterization of aesthetic orthodontic brackets by the dynamic indentation method.

作者信息

Iwasaki Taro, Nagata Shunsuke, Ishikawa Takahiro, Tanimoto Yasuhiro

机构信息

Department of Dental Biomaterials, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo.

Department of Orthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo.

出版信息

Dent Mater J. 2022 Nov 30;41(6):860-867. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2022-051. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.4012/dmj.2022-051
PMID:35934802
Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the mechanical properties, such as the dynamic hardness and indentation elastic modulus, of commercially available aesthetic orthodontic brackets, such as ceramic and plastic brackets, by the dynamic micro-indentation method. Five ceramic brackets, which were made of alumina (both monocrystalline and polycrystalline forms) or zirconia, and two plastic brackets, which were made of glass fiber-reinforced polycarbonate or polyamide, were tested. There were significant differences in the mechanical properties of the monocrystalline and polycrystalline alumina brackets. The mechanical properties of the glass fiber-reinforced plastic bracket were significantly superior to these of the non-glass-fiber-reinforced plastic bracket. The differences in the crystal structures of the ceramic brackets surface affected the dynamic hardness and indentation elastic modulus. Furthermore, the short glass fibers contained in the plastic bracket might contribute to the improvement of the mechanical properties.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过动态微压痕法研究市售美观正畸托槽(如陶瓷和塑料托槽)的力学性能,如动态硬度和压痕弹性模量。测试了五个由氧化铝(单晶和多晶形式)或氧化锆制成的陶瓷托槽,以及两个由玻璃纤维增强聚碳酸酯或聚酰胺制成的塑料托槽。单晶和多晶氧化铝托槽的力学性能存在显著差异。玻璃纤维增强塑料托槽的力学性能明显优于非玻璃纤维增强塑料托槽。陶瓷托槽表面晶体结构的差异影响了动态硬度和压痕弹性模量。此外,塑料托槽中含有的短玻璃纤维可能有助于力学性能的提高。

相似文献

1
Mechanical characterization of aesthetic orthodontic brackets by the dynamic indentation method.采用动态压痕法对美学正畸托槽进行力学特性表征。
Dent Mater J. 2022 Nov 30;41(6):860-867. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2022-051. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
A study of the mechanical properties of as-received and intraorally exposed single-crystal and polycrystalline orthodontic ceramic brackets.接收时和口腔内暴露的单晶和多晶正畸陶瓷托槽的机械性能研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jan 27;42(1):72-77. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz024.
3
Fracture toughness and hardness of in-office, 3D-printed ceramic brackets.诊室用 3D 打印陶瓷托槽的断裂韧性和硬度。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Aug;26(3):476-480. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12632. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
4
Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.三种现代塑料托槽槽底表面粗糙度与摩擦力的研究
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):177-83. doi: 10.2319/030313-179.1. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
5
Evaluation of frictional forces of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets.聚碳酸酯自锁托槽摩擦力的评估
World J Orthod. 2010 Fall;11(3):250-5.
6
Light energy transmission through six different makes of ceramic orthodontic brackets.光能量透过六种不同品牌的陶瓷正畸托槽的情况。
Int Orthod. 2018 Dec;16(4):638-651. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Aesthetic colour performance of plastic and ceramic brackets -- an in vitro study.塑料和陶瓷托槽的美学色彩表现——一项体外研究。
J Orthod. 2011 Sep;38(3):167-74. doi: 10.1179/14653121141434.
8
Comparative assessment of the roughness, hardness, and wear resistance of aesthetic bracket materials.美学托槽材料粗糙度、硬度和耐磨性的比较评估
Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):890-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.007.
9
In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets.新型美观托槽固位能力的体外比较
Eur J Orthod. 1999 Feb;21(1):71-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.1.71.
10
Polymerization efficiency of chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure.化学固化和可见光固化正畸粘合剂的聚合效率:固化程度
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Sep;108(3):294-301. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70024-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Microhardness and Chemical Composition of Different Ceramic Self-Ligating Brackets: An Study.不同陶瓷自锁托槽的显微硬度和化学成分:一项研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;13(7):285. doi: 10.3390/dj13070285.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Aesthetic Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Aged Composite Restorative Resin Materials.美学正畸托槽与老化复合树脂修复材料粘结的剪切粘结强度的比较评估
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;17(5):621. doi: 10.3390/polym17050621.
3
Comparing the mechanical properties of the polymer orthodontic bracket materials with the conventional orthodontic bracket materials: A systematic review.
比较聚合物正畸托槽材料与传统正畸托槽材料的力学性能:一项系统评价。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Nov 21;21:59. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_196_24. eCollection 2024.
4
The Mechanical and Clinical Properties of Customized Orthodontic Bracket Systems-A Comprehensive Review.定制正畸托槽系统的力学和临床性能——综述
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Oct 7;15(10):299. doi: 10.3390/jfb15100299.