• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在下一代测序时代,针对不明原因的智力残疾/全面发育迟缓进行脆性X综合征检测的二线地位。

The second-tier status of fragile X syndrome testing for unexplained intellectual disability/global developmental delay in the era of next-generation sequencing.

作者信息

Zhang Wen, Li Dong, Pang Nan, Jiang Li, Li Baomin, Ye Fanghua, He Fang, Chen Shimeng, Liu Fangyun, Peng Jing, Yin Jinghua, Yin Fei

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Hunan Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, Pediatrics, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 22;10:911805. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.911805. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2022.911805
PMID:35935362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9353215/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although many unexplained intellectual disability/global developmental delay (ID/GDD) individuals have benefited from the excellent detection yield of copy number variations and next-generation sequencing testing, many individuals still who suffer from ID/GDD of unexplained etiology. In this study, we investigated the applicability of fragile X syndrome (FXS) testing in unexplained ID/GDD individuals with negative or absent genetic testing.

METHODS

In this study, we used the triplet repeat primed polymerase chain reaction to evaluate the value and application of fragile X testing in unexplained ID/GDD individuals with negative or absent genetic testing ( = 681) from three hospitals.

RESULTS

Of the 681 ID/GDD individuals with negative or absent genetic testing results detected by FXS testing, 12 men and one woman were positive. This corresponded to a diagnostic yield of 1.9% for FXS testing in our cohort. All FXS individuals had either a family history of ID/GDD or suggestive clinical features. The detection yield of FXS testing in ID/GDD individuals who completed genetic testing (2.70%, 12/438) was significantly higher than in individuals without any genetic testing (0.40%, 1/243).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of FXS testing in ID/GDD individuals who lacked previous genetic testing, which promotes standardization of the FXS diagnostic process. These results highlight the utility of FXS testing of unexplained ID/GDD individuals with negative results from standard genetic testing. In the era of next-generation sequencing, FXS testing is more suitable as a second-tier choice and provides clinicians and geneticists with auxiliary references for tracing the etiology of ID/GDD.

摘要

目的

尽管许多不明原因的智力残疾/全面发育迟缓(ID/GDD)个体受益于拷贝数变异检测和下一代测序检测的高检出率,但仍有许多个体患有病因不明的ID/GDD。在本研究中,我们调查了脆性X综合征(FXS)检测在基因检测为阴性或未进行基因检测的不明原因ID/GDD个体中的适用性。

方法

在本研究中,我们使用三联体重复引物聚合酶链反应来评估FXS检测在来自三家医院基因检测为阴性或未进行基因检测的不明原因ID/GDD个体(n = 681)中的价值和应用。

结果

在通过FXS检测发现基因检测结果为阴性或未进行基因检测的681例ID/GDD个体中,12名男性和1名女性呈阳性。这相当于我们队列中FXS检测的诊断率为1.9%。所有FXS个体均有ID/GDD家族史或提示性临床特征。在完成基因检测的ID/GDD个体中FXS检测的检出率(2.70%,12/438)显著高于未进行任何基因检测的个体(0.40%,1/243)。

结论

这是首次关于对之前未进行基因检测的ID/GDD个体进行FXS检测的报告,这促进了FXS诊断过程的标准化。这些结果突出了对标准基因检测结果为阴性的不明原因ID/GDD个体进行FXS检测的效用。在下一代测序时代,FXS检测更适合作为二线选择,并为临床医生和遗传学家追踪ID/GDD的病因提供辅助参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2e/9353215/24bb916a26fa/fped-10-911805-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2e/9353215/56164e5f1cde/fped-10-911805-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2e/9353215/24bb916a26fa/fped-10-911805-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2e/9353215/56164e5f1cde/fped-10-911805-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2e/9353215/24bb916a26fa/fped-10-911805-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The second-tier status of fragile X syndrome testing for unexplained intellectual disability/global developmental delay in the era of next-generation sequencing.在下一代测序时代,针对不明原因的智力残疾/全面发育迟缓进行脆性X综合征检测的二线地位。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 22;10:911805. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.911805. eCollection 2022.
2
Diagnostic approach with genetic tests for global developmental delay and/or intellectual disability: Single tertiary center experience.针对全球发育迟缓及/或智力残疾的基因检测诊断方法:单一三级中心经验
Ann Hum Genet. 2019 May;83(3):115-123. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12294. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
3
Updates in the genetic evaluation of the child with global developmental delay or intellectual disability.全球发育迟缓或智力残疾儿童遗传评估的新进展。
Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2012 Dec;19(4):173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2012.09.004.
4
Comprehensive evaluation of the child with global developmental delays or intellectual disability.对患有全面发育迟缓或智力残疾儿童的综合评估。
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2024 Sep;67(9):435-446. doi: 10.3345/cep.2023.01697. Epub 2024 May 29.
5
Diagnosis of intellectual disability/global developmental delay via genetic analysis in a central region of China.通过基因分析对中国中部地区智力残疾/全面发育迟缓进行诊断。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Jul 5;132(13):1533-1540. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000295.
6
Genetic determinants of global developmental delay and intellectual disability in Ukrainian children.乌克兰儿童全球发育迟缓与智力障碍的遗传决定因素。
J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Mar 27;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09528-x.
7
Evaluation of Individuals with Non-Syndromic Global Developmental Delay and Intellectual Disability.非综合征性全面发育迟缓与智力障碍个体的评估
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;10(3):414. doi: 10.3390/children10030414.
8
Re-evaluating the first-tier status of fragile X testing in neurodevelopmental disorders.重新评估脆性 X 检测在神经发育障碍中的一级地位。
Genet Med. 2020 Jun;22(6):1036-1039. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0773-x. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Genome-Wide Sequencing Modalities for Children with Unexplained Global Developmental Delay and Intellectual Disabilities-A Narrative Review.不明原因的全面发育迟缓及智力障碍儿童的全基因组测序方式——一篇叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;10(3):501. doi: 10.3390/children10030501.
10
Pathogenic Copy Number Variations Involved in the Genetic Etiology of Syndromic and Non-Syndromic Intellectual Disability-Data from a Romanian Cohort.涉及综合征型和非综合征型智力障碍遗传病因的致病性拷贝数变异——来自罗马尼亚队列的数据
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;12(12):3137. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123137.

本文引用的文献

1
and Autism, an Intriguing Connection Revisited.自闭症,一个值得重新探讨的有趣关联。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Aug 6;12(8):1218. doi: 10.3390/genes12081218.
2
Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).外显子组和基因组测序用于患有先天畸形或智力障碍的儿科患者:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)的循证临床指南。
Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2029-2037. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01242-6. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Laboratory testing for fragile X, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
脆性 X 检测实验室,2021 修订版:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)的技术标准。
Genet Med. 2021 May;23(5):799-812. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01115-y. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Comparison of the diagnostic yield of aCGH and genome-wide sequencing across different neurodevelopmental disorders.比较全基因组芯片(aCGH)和全基因组测序在不同神经发育障碍中的诊断效率。
NPJ Genom Med. 2021 Mar 25;6(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00188-7.
5
Fragile X syndrome.脆性 X 综合征。
Curr Biol. 2021 Mar 22;31(6):R273-R275. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.043.
6
The molecular biology of FMRP: new insights into fragile X syndrome.脆性 X 综合征的 FMRP 分子生物学:新见解。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Apr;22(4):209-222. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00432-0. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
Accuracy and Performance Evaluation of Triplet Repeat Primed PCR as an Alternative to Conventional Diagnostic Methods for Fragile X Syndrome.三链重复引物 PCR 作为脆性 X 综合征传统诊断方法的替代方法的准确性和性能评估。
Ann Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;41(4):394-400. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.4.394.
8
CNV profiles of Chinese pediatric patients with developmental disorders.中国儿科发育障碍患者的 CNV 图谱。
Genet Med. 2021 Apr;23(4):669-678. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01048-y. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
Clinical sequencing yield in epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癫痫、自闭症谱系障碍和智力障碍的临床测序结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epilepsia. 2021 Jan;62(1):143-151. doi: 10.1111/epi.16755. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
10
Re-evaluating the first-tier status of fragile X testing in neurodevelopmental disorders.重新评估脆性 X 检测在神经发育障碍中的一级地位。
Genet Med. 2020 Jun;22(6):1036-1039. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0773-x. Epub 2020 Mar 10.