• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周血白细胞比率作为新生儿败血症生物标志物的效用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

The Utility of Peripheral Blood Leucocyte Ratios as Biomarkers in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Juanjuan, Zeng Jun'an, Zhang Liangjuan, Yu Xiping, Guo Jinzhen, Li Zhankui

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 22;10:908362. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.908362. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2022.908362
PMID:35935369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9353072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early stage diagnosis of neonatal sepsis (NS) remains a major roadblock due to non-specific symptoms and the absence of precise laboratory index tests. The full blood count is a relatively cheap, universal, and rapid diagnostic test.

METHOD

This study assessed the diagnostic accuracies of immature-to-total neutrophil ratio (ITR), immature-to-mature neutrophil ratio (IMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) used in the diagnosis of NS. Included studies were retrieved by searching four major databases and relevant references, and reviewed based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated, was utilized to test for heterogeneity, and the source was investigated meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Finally, 38 studies passed the eligibility criteria. A total of thirty-one studies (6,221 neonates) included data on the ITR, eight studies (1,230 neonates) included data on the IMR, seven studies (751 neonates) included data on the NLR, and two studies (283 neonates) included data on the PLR. The summary sensitivity estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ITR, IMR, NLR, and PLR tests were, respectively, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.54-0.88), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.78), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.55-1.00). The summary specificity values for the ITR, IMR, NLR, and PLR tests were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.79), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the ITR, IMR, and NLR tests were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79). The PLR could not be evaluated because only two studies included pertinent data.

CONCLUSION

The NLR test might not be sufficiently accurate in precisely diagnosing NS. The ITR and IMR tests alone can improve the accuracy of NS diagnosis, but the marked heterogeneity and the limited number of studies prevented us from reaching any definitive conclusions. Thus, further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021247850].

摘要

背景

由于新生儿败血症(NS)症状不具特异性且缺乏精确的实验室指标检测,其早期诊断仍然是一个主要障碍。全血细胞计数是一种相对廉价、通用且快速的诊断测试。

方法

本研究评估了未成熟中性粒细胞与总中性粒细胞比率(ITR)、未成熟中性粒细胞与成熟中性粒细胞比率(IMR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)以及血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)在NS诊断中的诊断准确性。通过检索四个主要数据库及相关参考文献来获取纳入研究,并根据纳入/排除标准进行综述。计算合并敏感性和特异性,采用 检验异质性,并通过Meta回归分析探究来源。

结果

最终,38项研究通过了纳入标准。共有31项研究(6221例新生儿)纳入了ITR数据,8项研究(1230例新生儿)纳入了IMR数据,7项研究(751例新生儿)纳入了NLR数据,2项研究(283例新生儿)纳入了PLR数据。ITR、IMR、NLR和PLR测试的汇总敏感性估计值及其95%置信区间(CI)分别为0.74(95%CI:0.66 - 0.80)、0.74(95%CI:0.54 - 0.88)、0.73(95%CI:0.68 - 0.78)和0.81(95%CI:0.55 - 1.00)。ITR、IMR、NLR和PLR测试的汇总特异性值分别为0.83(95%CI:0.77 - 0.87)、0.89(95%CI:0.80 - 0.94)、0.69(95%CI:0.57 - 0.79)和0.93(95%CI:0.81 - 1.00)。ITR、IMR和NLR测试的汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.85(95%CI:0.82 - 0.88)、0.91(95%CI:0.88 - 0.93)和0.75(95%CI:0.71 - 0.79)。由于仅有两项研究纳入了相关数据,故无法对PLR进行评估。

结论

NLR测试在精确诊断NS方面可能不够准确。单独的ITR和IMR测试可提高NS诊断的准确性,但显著的异质性和有限的研究数量使我们无法得出任何确定性结论。因此,有必要进行进一步研究以验证这些发现。

系统评价注册

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/],标识符[CRD42021247850]

相似文献

1
The Utility of Peripheral Blood Leucocyte Ratios as Biomarkers in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.外周血白细胞比率作为新生儿败血症生物标志物的效用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 22;10:908362. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.908362. eCollection 2022.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of complete blood cell count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, lymphocyte-to-monocyte, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios for neonatal infection.全血细胞计数及中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞、淋巴细胞与单核细胞、血小板与淋巴细胞比值对新生儿感染的诊断准确性
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2022 Feb 28;16(1):43-52. doi: 10.2478/abm-2022-0006. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in diagnosing neonatal sepsis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值在新生儿败血症诊断中的作用。
Narra J. 2024 Aug;4(2):e763. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.763. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Diagnostic and prognostic predictive values of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-1 expression in neonatal sepsis: A meta-analysis and systematic review.髓样细胞表达触发受体-1在新生儿败血症中的诊断和预后预测价值:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 22;10:929665. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.929665. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparison of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值在新生儿败血症诊断中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04094-y.
6
Predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the prognosis and risk of death for adult sepsis patients: a meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对成人脓毒症患者预后和死亡风险的预测价值:一项荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 18;15:1336456. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1336456. eCollection 2024.
7
The association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio with retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值与视网膜静脉阻塞的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 May;100(3):e635-e647. doi: 10.1111/aos.14955. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
8
Value of blood inflammatory markers for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血液炎症标志物对预测川崎病静脉注射免疫球蛋白抵抗的价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 23;10:969502. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.969502. eCollection 2022.
9
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as independent predictors of outcome in infective endocarditis (IE).中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为感染性心内膜炎(IE)预后的独立预测指标。
Egypt Heart J. 2019 Sep 18;71(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43044-019-0014-2.
10
Predictive values of the postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for the diagnosis of early periprosthetic joint infections: a preliminary study.术后中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值及淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值对早期人工关节周围感染诊断的预测价值:一项初步研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Nov 30;15(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02107-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Role of NLR, dNLR, PLR, NLPR, and Other Laboratory Markers in Diagnosing SIRS in Premature Newborns.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、动态中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞前体比值(NLPR)及其他实验室指标在诊断早产儿全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)中的预测作用
Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 6;14(3):1065-1075. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14030084.
2
A meta-analysis on first-trimester blood count parameters-is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio a potentially novel method for first-trimester preeclampsia screening?早孕期血细胞计数参数的荟萃分析——中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是早孕期子痫前期筛查的一种潜在新方法吗?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 3;11:1336764. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1336764. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Septic Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.非重症监护病房脓毒症患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值的诊断准确性和预后价值。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 7;57(8):811. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080811.
2
Platelet-to-Lymphocyte and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictive Biomarkers for Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis.血小板与淋巴细胞比值和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为预测早发型新生儿败血症的生物标志物。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Jul;31(7):821-824. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.07.821.
3
MYD88, NFKB1, and IL6 transcripts overexpression are associated with poor outcomes and short survival in neonatal sepsis.
[Prognostic utility of inflammatory indexes in critically ill newborns].
[炎症指标在危重新生儿中的预后效用]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S171-S177.
4
Predicting Potentially Fatal COVID-19 Disease in Pregnant Patients Using the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR).利用中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)预测孕妇中可能致命的COVID-19疾病
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 2;12(21):6896. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216896.
MYD88、NFKB1 和 IL6 转录本过表达与新生儿败血症的不良结局和短生存期相关。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92912-7.
4
The Utility of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Early Diagnostic Marker in Neonatal Sepsis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为新生儿败血症早期诊断标志物的效用
Cureus. 2021 Jan 24;13(1):e12891. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12891.
5
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Alternative Marker of Neonatal Sepsis in Developing Countries.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为发展中国家新生儿败血症的替代标志物
Oman Med J. 2021 Jan 6;36(1):e214. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.05. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
TLR2 and TLR4 expressions in late-onset neonatal sepsis: Is it a potential novel biomarker?晚期新生儿败血症中 TLR2 和 TLR4 的表达:是否为潜在的新型生物标志物?
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2021;14(3):361-367. doi: 10.3233/NPM-200411.
7
Can we improve early identification of neonatal late-onset sepsis? A validated prediction model.我们能否提高新生儿晚发性败血症的早期识别能力?一个经过验证的预测模型。
J Perinatol. 2020 Sep;40(9):1315-1322. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0649-6. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
8
Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Neonates: A Predictor of Early onset Neonatal Sepsis.新生儿血小板与淋巴细胞比值:早发型新生儿败血症的一个预测指标
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 1;11(1):e2019055. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2019.055. eCollection 2019.
9
Immature to total neutrophil ratio as an early indicator of early neonatal sepsis.未成熟中性粒细胞与总中性粒细胞比值作为早期新生儿败血症的早期指标。
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Jan-Feb;35(1):241-246. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.1.99.
10
The utility of peripheral blood leucocyte ratios as biomarkers in infectious diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.外周血白细胞比值作为感染性疾病生物标志物的效用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2019 May;78(5):339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 22.