Kurt Abdullah, Tosun Merve Sezen, Altuntaş Nilgün
Department of Pediatrics, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Yenimahalle Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06370, Turkey.
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2022 Feb 28;16(1):43-52. doi: 10.2478/abm-2022-0006. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Complete blood cell (CBC) counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios (PLR) are simple measurements that are conducted as part of routine diagnostic procedures.
To determine the diagnostic importance, specificity, and sensitivity of these measurements for the diagnosis of neonatal infections and in discriminating between neonatal sepsis and various other infections.
We conducted a retrospective study of data from a consecutive series of 232 neonatal patients admitted to Yildirim Beyazit University Yenimahalle Training and Research Hospital in Ankara for 2 years from 2016 to 2018. We included patients with a diagnosis of or clinically suspected infection, and healthy neonates were included as controls. Data included CBC counts, and bacterial culture results, considered the criterion standard for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. NLR, LMR, and PLR were calculated. We compared data using independent Student and Mann-Whitney tests and determined the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LHOR) of the characteristics for neonatal sepsis using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.
We included data from 155 neonatal patients with a diagnosis or suspicion of infection and 77 healthy neonates. NLR was significantly higher in neonates with sepsis or fever due to dehydration ( < 0.001) than in neonates with other infections or healthy neonates. LMR was significantly higher in neonates with sepsis or viral infection than in those with other infections or healthy controls ( = 0.003). In neonates with early-onset sepsis (EOS), we found cut-off values of ≥4.79 [area under curve (AUC) 0.845, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.93, LHOR 11.6, specificity 98.7%, sensitivity 15%] for NLR, ≥1.24 (AUC 0.295; CI 0.18-0.41, LHOR 1.02, specificity 2.6%, sensitivity 100%) for LMR, and ≥37.72 (AUC 0.268; CI 0.15-0.39, LHOR 0.86, specificity 7.8%, sensitivity 80%) for PLR. We found cut-off values of ≥4.94 (AUC 0.667; CI 0.56-0.77, LHOR 4.16, specificity 98.7%, sensitivity 5.4%) for NLR and ≥10.92 (AUC 0.384; CI 0.26-0.51, LHOR 6.24, specificity 98.7%, sensitivity 8.1%) for LMR in those with late-onset sepsis (LOS).
CBCs, NLR, LMR, and PLR may be useful for the differential diagnosis of EOS and LOS, and neonates with sepsis from those with other infection. NLR may be a useful diagnostic test to identify neonatal patients with septicemia more quickly than other commonly used diagnostic tests such as blood cultures. NLR has high specificity and LHOR, but low sensitivity.
全血细胞计数(CBC)以及中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)是作为常规诊断程序一部分进行的简单测量。
确定这些测量对于新生儿感染诊断以及区分新生儿败血症和其他各种感染的诊断重要性、特异性和敏感性。
我们对2016年至2018年期间连续232例入住安卡拉耶尔德勒姆·贝亚齐特大学耶尼马哈勒培训与研究医院的新生儿患者的数据进行了回顾性研究。我们纳入了诊断为或临床怀疑感染的患者,并纳入健康新生儿作为对照。数据包括全血细胞计数和细菌培养结果,细菌培养结果被视为新生儿败血症诊断的标准。计算了NLR、LMR和PLR。我们使用独立样本t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验比较数据,并使用受试者工作特征曲线分析确定新生儿败血症特征的敏感性、特异性和似然比(LHOR)。
我们纳入了155例诊断或怀疑感染的新生儿患者以及77例健康新生儿的数据。患有败血症或因脱水导致发热的新生儿的NLR显著高于患有其他感染的新生儿或健康新生儿(P<0.001)。患有败血症或病毒感染的新生儿的LMR显著高于患有其他感染的新生儿或健康对照(P = 0.003)。在早发型败血症(EOS)新生儿中,我们发现NLR的截断值≥4.79[曲线下面积(AUC)0.845,95%置信区间(CI)0.76 - 0.93,LHOR 11.6,特异性98.7%,敏感性15%],LMR的截断值≥1.24(AUC 0.295;CI 0.18 - 0.41,LHOR 1.02,特异性2.6%,敏感性100%),PLR的截断值≥37.72(AUC 0.268;CI 0.15 - 0.39,LHOR 0.86,特异性7.8%,敏感性80%)。在晚发型败血症(LOS)患者中,我们发现NLR的截断值≥4.94(AUC 0.667;CI 0.56 - 0.77,LHOR 4.16,特异性98.7%,敏感性5.4%),LMR的截断值≥10.92(AUC 0.384;CI 0.26 - 0.51,LHOR 6.24,特异性98.7%,敏感性8.1%)。
全血细胞计数、NLR、LMR和PLR可能有助于EOS和LOS的鉴别诊断,以及败血症新生儿与其他感染新生儿的鉴别诊断。与血培养等其他常用诊断测试相比,NLR可能是一种更快速识别败血症新生儿患者的有用诊断测试。NLR具有高特异性和LHOR,但敏感性低。