Nehring Ryan
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Third World Q. 2022 Jun 3;43(8):1970-1987. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2022.2079489. eCollection 2022.
Historical concerns over the exploitation of the Global South's genetic biodiversity framed the importance of creating global governance mechanisms to ensure fair access to and benefit-sharing of genetic resources worldwide. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (Plant Treaty) came into existence over the past three decades to redress the centuries of genetic exploitation of the Global South. Both of the treaties explicitly regulate and facilitate the exchange of physical genetic material. The recent emergence of relevant digital technologies, such as digital sequencing information (DSI), could make both treaties irrelevant. This article analyses the current state of the CBD and Plant Treaty as it relates to global agricultural research in light of DSI. I argue that DSI presents less of a threat to exacerbating historical gene flows than it does to the further displacement of public sector research by the private sector. The article then suggests looking at the lessons from open-source approaches to counter the privatisation of DSI and related gene flows. I draw on 11 key informant interviews with country negotiators involved with the CBD and Plant Treaty as well as a review of official reports from both frameworks.
历史上对全球南方遗传生物多样性被剥削的担忧,凸显了建立全球治理机制以确保在全球范围内公平获取遗传资源并分享其惠益的重要性。《生物多样性公约》(CBD)和《粮食和农业植物遗传资源国际条约》(《植物条约》)在过去三十年中应运而生,以纠正全球南方长达数百年的遗传资源被剥削状况。这两项条约都明确规范并促进实物遗传材料的交换。诸如数字测序信息(DSI)等相关数字技术的近期出现,可能会使这两项条约变得无关紧要。本文根据DSI分析了《生物多样性公约》和《植物条约》与全球农业研究相关的现状。我认为,DSI对加剧历史基因流动的威胁,小于其对私营部门进一步取代公共部门研究的威胁。文章接着建议借鉴开源方法的经验教训,以应对DSI及相关基因流动的私有化。我对参与《生物多样性公约》和《植物条约》的国家谈判代表进行了11次关键信息人访谈,并对这两个框架的官方报告进行了审查。