Ebert Andreas W, Engels Johannes M M, Schafleitner Roland, Hintum Theo van, Mwila Godfrey
Independent Researcher, 73529 Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany.
Independent Researcher, Voc. Podere Sansano 5, 06062 Citta' della Pieve (PG), Italy.
Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;12(16):2992. doi: 10.3390/plants12162992.
Plant breeders develop competitive, high-yielding, resistant crop varieties that can cope with the challenges of biotic stresses and tolerate abiotic stresses, resulting in nutritious food for consumers worldwide. To achieve this, plant breeders need continuous and easy access to plant genetic resources (PGR) for trait screening, to generate new diversity that can be built into newly improved varieties. International agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) and the Nagoya Protocol recognised the sovereign rights of countries over their genetic resources. Under the CBD/Nagoya Protocol, countries are free to establish specific national legislations regulating germplasm access and benefit-sharing to be negotiated bilaterally. Consequently, access to PGR became increasingly restricted and cumbersome, resulting in a decrease in germplasm exchange. The ITPGRFA attempted to ease this situation by establishing a globally harmonised multilateral system (MLS). Unfortunately, the MLS is (still) restricted to a limited number of food and forage crops, with very few vegetable crops. Easy and continuous access to genetic diversity combined with equitable and fair sharing of derived benefits is a prerequisite to breeding new varieties. Facilitated access contributes to sustainable crop production and food and nutrition security; therefore, access to and, consequently, use of PGRFA needs to be improved. Thus, the authors recommend, among others, expanding the scope of the ITPGRFA to include all PGRFA and making them and all related information accessible under a Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA) combined, if necessary, with a subscription system or a seed sales tax. Such a transparent, functional and efficient system would erase legal uncertainties and minimise transaction costs for conservers, curators and users of genetic resources, thus aiding plant breeders to fulfil their mission.
植物育种者培育出具有竞争力、高产且抗病的作物品种,这些品种能够应对生物胁迫挑战并耐受非生物胁迫,从而为全球消费者提供营养丰富的食物。为实现这一目标,植物育种者需要持续且便捷地获取植物遗传资源(PGR)以进行性状筛选,从而创造新的多样性,并将其融入新改良品种中。诸如《生物多样性公约》(CBD)、《粮食和农业植物遗传资源国际条约》(ITPGRFA)以及《名古屋议定书》等国际协定承认各国对其遗传资源拥有主权权利。根据CBD/《名古屋议定书》,各国可自行制定具体的国家立法,规范种质获取和惠益分享,并通过双边谈判达成协议。因此,获取PGR变得愈发受限且繁琐,导致种质交换减少。ITPGRFA试图通过建立全球统一的多边系统(MLS)来缓解这一局面。遗憾的是,MLS(至今)仍局限于少数粮食和饲料作物,蔬菜作物极少。便捷且持续地获取遗传多样性,同时公平公正地分享衍生惠益,是培育新品种的前提条件。便利获取有助于可持续作物生产以及粮食和营养安全;因此,需要改善对PGRFA的获取及使用情况。为此,作者建议,除其他措施外,扩大ITPGRFA的范围,将所有PGRFA纳入其中,并依据标准材料转让协议(SMTA),必要时结合订阅系统或种子销售税,使这些资源及所有相关信息均可获取。这样一个透明、实用且高效的系统将消除法律上的不确定性,并将遗传资源保存者、管理者和使用者的交易成本降至最低,从而帮助植物育种者完成其使命。