Shifting ear differences in melody recognition through strategy inducement.

In a previous study, the pattern of ear superiority displayed by nonmusicians in a task where dichotically presented target melodies have to be recognized among four probes was found to be correlated with subjects' descriptions of their operating modes: those who reported focusing on critical local differences in pitch tended to show right ear advantage (REA) and the others LEA. The purpose of the present study was to examine if laterality patterns can be affected by treatments designed to induce particular strategies. Treatments supposed to orient toward analytic processing, advising attention to critical notes, with (Experiment 2) or without (Experiment 1) the additional task of reporting their location, produced the expected shift toward REA. To the contrary, treatments supposed to orient toward holistic processing, advising attention to overall contour or requesting aesthetic judgments (Experiment 1), failed to produce the expected shift toward LEA. The result can be attributed either to a basic difference in susceptibility to strategic control between the different operating modes or, more simply, to ineffectiveness of the present holistically oriented treatments.