• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evidence of Grammatical Knowledge in Apes: An Analysis of Kanzi's Performance on Reversible Sentences.猿类语法知识的证据:对坎齐在可逆句上表现的分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 21;13:885605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885605. eCollection 2022.
2
Online Processing of Subject-Verb-Object Order in a Diverse Sample of Mandarin-Exposed Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.在线处理自闭症谱系障碍的多种语料库中的主语-动词-宾语语序。
Autism Res. 2019 Dec;12(12):1829-1844. doi: 10.1002/aur.2190. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
3
Degraded and computer-generated speech processing in a bonobo.倭黑猩猩的退化和计算机生成语音处理。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec;25(6):1393-1398. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01621-9. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
Grammatical cues to subjecthood are redundant in a majority of simple clauses across languages.在所有语言的大多数简单从句中,主语的语法线索都是多余的。
Cognition. 2023 Dec;241:105543. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105543. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Language comprehension in ape and child.猿与儿童的语言理解能力。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1993;58(3-4):1-222.
6
Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.低频神经活动反映了言语听知觉中基于规则的组块化。
Elife. 2020 Apr 20;9:e55613. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55613.
7
Underestimating Kanzi? Exploring Kanzi-Oldowan comparisons in light of recent human stone tool replication.低估 Kanzi 了吗?根据最近人类石器复制的情况,探讨 Kanzi-Oldowan 之间的比较。
Evol Anthropol. 2020 Nov;29(6):310-316. doi: 10.1002/evan.21858. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar.词汇与语法的陈述性/程序性模型
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Jan;30(1):37-69. doi: 10.1023/a:1005204207369.
9
Investigating the Grammatical and Pragmatic Origins of Wh-Questions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.探究自闭症谱系障碍儿童特殊疑问句的语法和语用起源
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 10;8:319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00319. eCollection 2017.
10
Grammar of Binding in the languages of the world: Innate or learned?世界语言中的约束语法:与生俱来还是后天习得?
Cognition. 2015 Aug;141:138-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling mechanisms of human brain evolution.揭示人类大脑进化的机制。
Cell. 2024 Oct 17;187(21):5838-5857. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.052.

本文引用的文献

1
How could language have evolved?语言是如何演变的?
PLoS Biol. 2014 Aug 26;12(8):e1001934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934. eCollection 2014 Aug.
2
Is recursion language-specific? Evidence of recursive mechanisms in the structure of intentional action.递归是特定于语言的吗?意向性行动结构中递归机制的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:169-88. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
Evolution, brain, and the nature of language.进化、大脑与语言的本质。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Feb;17(2):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
4
Evolution of brain and language.大脑与语言的进化。
Prog Brain Res. 2012;195:443-59. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53860-4.00022-2.
5
Centre-embedded structures are a by-product of associative learning and working memory constraints: evidence from baboons (Papio Papio).中心嵌入结构是联想学习和工作记忆限制的副产品:来自狒狒(Papio papio)的证据。
Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):180-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.语言共性的神话:语言多样性及其对认知科学的重要性。
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Oct;32(5):429-48; discussion 448-494. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X.
7
The faculty of language: what's special about it?语言能力:它有什么特别之处?
Cognition. 2005 Mar;95(2):201-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004.
8
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?语言能力:它是什么,谁拥有它,以及它是如何进化的?
Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1569-79. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.
9
Language comprehension in ape and child.猿与儿童的语言理解能力。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1993;58(3-4):1-222.
10
Language in chimpanzee?黑猩猩有语言能力吗?
Science. 1971 May 21;172(3985):808-22. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3985.808.

猿类语法知识的证据:对坎齐在可逆句上表现的分析。

Evidence of Grammatical Knowledge in Apes: An Analysis of Kanzi's Performance on Reversible Sentences.

作者信息

Schoenemann P Thomas

机构信息

Cognitive Science Program and Anthropology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 21;13:885605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885605. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885605
PMID:35936253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9355523/
Abstract

Ape language acquisition studies have demonstrated that apes can learn arbitrary mappings between different auditory or visual patterns and concepts, satisfying the definition of symbol use. The extent to which apes understand aspects of grammar is less well accepted. On the production side, several studies have shown that apes sometimes combine two or more symbols together, in non-random patterns. However, this is quite limited compared to human language production. On the comprehension side, much greater abilities have been reported in apes. One of the most famous examples is Kanzi, a bonobo who reportedly responded correctly to a large number of novel commands. However, based on his performance on a small subset of reversible sentences-where the understanding of English syntax was critical-the extent to which he demonstrated grammatical knowledge has been questioned. Using a randomization study it is shown here that his performance actually vastly exceeds random chance, supporting the contention that he does in fact understand word order grammatical rules in English. This of course represents only one aspect of English grammar, and does not suggest he has completely human grammatical abilities. However, it does show that he understands one of the arbitrary grammatical devices used in many languages: The use of word order to code argument relations. It also removes from serious consideration the view that apes lack any kind of grammatical ability. From an evolutionary perspective, Kanzi's ability is most likely to result from homologous brain circuitry, although this is ultimately an empirical question.

摘要

猿类语言习得研究表明,猿类能够学习不同听觉或视觉模式与概念之间的任意映射,满足符号使用的定义。猿类对语法各方面的理解程度则较难被认可。在语言产出方面,多项研究表明,猿类有时会以非随机模式将两个或更多符号组合在一起。然而,与人类语言产出相比,这相当有限。在语言理解方面,据报道猿类有更强的能力。最著名的例子之一是坎齐,一只倭黑猩猩,据报道它能正确回应大量新指令。然而,基于它在一小部分可逆句子上的表现——对英语句法的理解至关重要——它所展示的语法知识程度受到了质疑。通过一项随机化研究表明,它的表现实际上大大超过随机概率,支持了它实际上确实理解英语词序语法规则的观点。这当然只代表了英语语法的一个方面,并不意味着它具有完全人类的语法能力。然而,这确实表明它理解了许多语言中使用的一种任意语法手段:利用词序来编码论元关系。这也使猿类缺乏任何语法能力的观点不再值得认真考虑。从进化的角度来看,坎齐的能力很可能源于同源的大脑回路,尽管这最终是一个实证问题。