Suppr超能文献

猿类语法知识的证据:对坎齐在可逆句上表现的分析。

Evidence of Grammatical Knowledge in Apes: An Analysis of Kanzi's Performance on Reversible Sentences.

作者信息

Schoenemann P Thomas

机构信息

Cognitive Science Program and Anthropology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 21;13:885605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885605. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Ape language acquisition studies have demonstrated that apes can learn arbitrary mappings between different auditory or visual patterns and concepts, satisfying the definition of symbol use. The extent to which apes understand aspects of grammar is less well accepted. On the production side, several studies have shown that apes sometimes combine two or more symbols together, in non-random patterns. However, this is quite limited compared to human language production. On the comprehension side, much greater abilities have been reported in apes. One of the most famous examples is Kanzi, a bonobo who reportedly responded correctly to a large number of novel commands. However, based on his performance on a small subset of reversible sentences-where the understanding of English syntax was critical-the extent to which he demonstrated grammatical knowledge has been questioned. Using a randomization study it is shown here that his performance actually vastly exceeds random chance, supporting the contention that he does in fact understand word order grammatical rules in English. This of course represents only one aspect of English grammar, and does not suggest he has completely human grammatical abilities. However, it does show that he understands one of the arbitrary grammatical devices used in many languages: The use of word order to code argument relations. It also removes from serious consideration the view that apes lack any kind of grammatical ability. From an evolutionary perspective, Kanzi's ability is most likely to result from homologous brain circuitry, although this is ultimately an empirical question.

摘要

猿类语言习得研究表明,猿类能够学习不同听觉或视觉模式与概念之间的任意映射,满足符号使用的定义。猿类对语法各方面的理解程度则较难被认可。在语言产出方面,多项研究表明,猿类有时会以非随机模式将两个或更多符号组合在一起。然而,与人类语言产出相比,这相当有限。在语言理解方面,据报道猿类有更强的能力。最著名的例子之一是坎齐,一只倭黑猩猩,据报道它能正确回应大量新指令。然而,基于它在一小部分可逆句子上的表现——对英语句法的理解至关重要——它所展示的语法知识程度受到了质疑。通过一项随机化研究表明,它的表现实际上大大超过随机概率,支持了它实际上确实理解英语词序语法规则的观点。这当然只代表了英语语法的一个方面,并不意味着它具有完全人类的语法能力。然而,这确实表明它理解了许多语言中使用的一种任意语法手段:利用词序来编码论元关系。这也使猿类缺乏任何语法能力的观点不再值得认真考虑。从进化的角度来看,坎齐的能力很可能源于同源的大脑回路,尽管这最终是一个实证问题。

相似文献

1
Evidence of Grammatical Knowledge in Apes: An Analysis of Kanzi's Performance on Reversible Sentences.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 21;13:885605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885605. eCollection 2022.
3
Degraded and computer-generated speech processing in a bonobo.
Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec;25(6):1393-1398. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01621-9. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
Grammatical cues to subjecthood are redundant in a majority of simple clauses across languages.
Cognition. 2023 Dec;241:105543. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105543. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Language comprehension in ape and child.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1993;58(3-4):1-222.
7
Underestimating Kanzi? Exploring Kanzi-Oldowan comparisons in light of recent human stone tool replication.
Evol Anthropol. 2020 Nov;29(6):310-316. doi: 10.1002/evan.21858. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Jan;30(1):37-69. doi: 10.1023/a:1005204207369.
9
Investigating the Grammatical and Pragmatic Origins of Wh-Questions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 10;8:319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00319. eCollection 2017.
10
Grammar of Binding in the languages of the world: Innate or learned?
Cognition. 2015 Aug;141:138-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling mechanisms of human brain evolution.
Cell. 2024 Oct 17;187(21):5838-5857. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.052.

本文引用的文献

1
How could language have evolved?
PLoS Biol. 2014 Aug 26;12(8):e1001934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934. eCollection 2014 Aug.
2
Is recursion language-specific? Evidence of recursive mechanisms in the structure of intentional action.
Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:169-88. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
Evolution, brain, and the nature of language.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Feb;17(2):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
4
Evolution of brain and language.
Prog Brain Res. 2012;195:443-59. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53860-4.00022-2.
6
The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Oct;32(5):429-48; discussion 448-494. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X.
7
The faculty of language: what's special about it?
Cognition. 2005 Mar;95(2):201-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004.
8
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1569-79. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.
9
Language comprehension in ape and child.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1993;58(3-4):1-222.
10
Language in chimpanzee?
Science. 1971 May 21;172(3985):808-22. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3985.808.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验