• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首席执行官更替与企业创新:我们能从中国上市公司中学到什么。

CEO turnover and corporate innovation: What can we learn from Chinese listed companies.

作者信息

Sun Shujun, Jiang Haiwei

机构信息

School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 20;13:874907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874907. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874907
PMID:35936347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9346083/
Abstract

Using data of China's listed companies from 2000 to 2016, we employ a staggered difference-in-difference (DID) approach to identify the causal effects of CEO turnover on corporate innovation. First, we find that listed companies with CEO turnover experienced an average increase of 9.5% in the quantity of innovation and 8.9% in innovation quality after the change. The dynamic effect test supports the parallel trend condition, and the placebo test rules out the nonrandom selection issue. Second, the heterogeneity tests show that CEO turnover plays a more prominent role in promoting innovation for listed firms with CEO duality, high financial constraints, and in high-tech industries. Third, CEO turnover affects corporate innovation by driving top management team reorganization and promoting R&D input. This paper has important implications for the understanding of the role of CEO turnover in companies' innovation, as well as for strategy formulation and implementation.

摘要

利用2000年至2016年中国上市公司的数据,我们采用交错双重差分法(DID)来识别首席执行官更替对企业创新的因果效应。首先,我们发现,发生首席执行官更替的上市公司在更替后创新数量平均增长了9.5%,创新质量平均增长了8.9%。动态效应检验支持平行趋势条件,安慰剂检验排除了非随机选择问题。其次,异质性检验表明,对于存在首席执行官兼任董事长情况、面临高财务约束以及处于高科技行业的上市公司,首席执行官更替在促进创新方面发挥着更为突出的作用。第三,首席执行官更替通过推动高层管理团队重组和促进研发投入来影响企业创新。本文对于理解首席执行官更替在公司创新中的作用以及战略制定和实施具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/136fb1dec1a8/fpsyg-13-874907-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/a6f7846fdaf5/fpsyg-13-874907-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/4c574258e5f1/fpsyg-13-874907-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/617331552e91/fpsyg-13-874907-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/136fb1dec1a8/fpsyg-13-874907-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/a6f7846fdaf5/fpsyg-13-874907-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/4c574258e5f1/fpsyg-13-874907-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/617331552e91/fpsyg-13-874907-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9346083/136fb1dec1a8/fpsyg-13-874907-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
CEO turnover and corporate innovation: What can we learn from Chinese listed companies.首席执行官更替与企业创新:我们能从中国上市公司中学到什么。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 20;13:874907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874907. eCollection 2022.
2
Executive pharmaceutical background, R&D investment and corporate innovation performance.制药行业高管背景、研发投资与企业创新绩效。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Nov 15;15(11):6576-6586. eCollection 2023.
3
How does CEO narcissism affect enterprise ambidextrous technological innovation? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility.CEO 自恋如何影响企业双元技术创新?企业社会责任的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280758. eCollection 2023.
4
Does China's centralized volume-based drug procurement policy facilitate the transition from imitation to innovation for listed pharmaceutical companies? Empirical tests based on double difference model.中国的药品集中带量采购政策是否有助于上市制药企业从仿制药向创新药转型?基于双重差分模型的实证检验。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 30;14:1192423. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1192423. eCollection 2023.
5
Does chief executive officer turnover affect green innovation quality and quantity? Evidence from China's manufacturing enterprises.首席执行官更替是否会影响绿色创新的质量和数量?来自中国制造业企业的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(34):81760-81782. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20365-0. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Study of CEO Narcissism and Corporate R&D Investment.首席执行官自恋与企业研发投资研究
Front Psychol. 2022 May 13;13:888618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888618. eCollection 2022.
7
Elucidating the effectiveness of cognitive CEO on corporate environmental performance: the mediating role of corporate innovation.揭示认知型首席执行官对企业环境绩效的有效性:企业创新的中介作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45938-45948. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10496-7. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
CEO Overconfidence, Corporate Governance, and R&D Smoothing in Technology-Based Entrepreneurial Firms.首席执行官过度自信、公司治理与科技型创业公司的研发平滑
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 13;13:944117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944117. eCollection 2022.
9
Financial performance of China's listed firms in presence of coronavirus: Evidence from corporate culture and corporate social responsibility.新冠疫情下中国上市公司的财务表现:来自企业文化和企业社会责任的证据
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(11):8897-8918. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02200-w. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
10
From ratings to action: The impact of ESG performance on corporate innovation.从评级到行动:企业社会责任与公司治理(ESG)表现对企业创新的影响
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 19;10(4):e26683. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26683. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm Performance: Evidence from the Pulp and Paper Industry in China.环境规制对企业绩效的影响:来自中国造纸及纸制品业的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042982.