• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

良水径煤矿顶板疏放后安全开采的多因素定量评价模型

A Multifactor Quantitative Assessment Model for Safe Mining after Roof Drainage in the Liangshuijing Coal Mine.

作者信息

Gao Chengyue, Wang Dangliang, Liu Kerui, Deng Guowei, Li Jianfeng, Jie Baolei

机构信息

China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China.

Shaanxi Energy Liangshuijing Mining Co., LTD, Yulin, Shaanxi 719315, China.

出版信息

ACS Omega. 2022 Jul 24;7(30):26437-26454. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02270. eCollection 2022 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1021/acsomega.2c02270
PMID:35936470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9350886/
Abstract

To prevent coal mine roof water damage, the water generally needs to be evacuated in advance. It can be mined with the water inrush risk assessed as safe. However, a single index is often employed in the water safety evaluation after the roof drainage, which causes a large gap between the evaluation results and the actual situation. Therefore, the evaluation cannot be effectively used to guide the safety mining in the working face. In this paper, based on the hydrogeological data of the Liangshuijing coal mine, a multifactor water inrush risk assessment model (IAHP-EWM) and multifactor index system are established for assessing the water inrush risk before and after the roof drainage. The improved AHP method and the entropy weight method are adopted in the model to determine the index weight. This combined way avoids the excessive subjectivity and objectivity of the index weight. A″ Fold undulation degree ( )″ is innovatively proposed to quantify the impact of the spatial relief of folds on water inrush in the multifactor index system. The IAHP-EWM model is applied to evaluate the risk of roof water inrush in the 42205 working face of the Liangshuijing coal mine. The evaluation results show that the water inrush risk is ″high″ when the water is not dredged, and the water inrush risk is ″low″ after the water is dredged, which are consistent with the actual water inflow data and evaluation results, which verifies the accuracy of the model. The application results of the IAHP-EWM model in the 42202, 42203, and 42204 working faces verify its universal applicability in the Liangshuijing mining area. It can provide a reference for the evaluation of the roof water damage control effect during coal seam mining.

摘要

为防止煤矿顶板水害,一般需提前疏排积水,在评估突水风险为安全的情况下方可开采。然而,目前顶板排水后水害安全性评价往往采用单一指标,导致评价结果与实际情况存在较大差距,无法有效指导工作面的安全开采。本文基于良水径煤矿的水文地质资料,建立了用于评估顶板排水前后突水风险的多因素突水风险评估模型(IAHP-EWM)及多因素指标体系。模型采用改进的层次分析法和熵权法确定指标权重,这种组合方式避免了指标权重确定过程中主观性和客观性过强的问题。在多因素指标体系中创新性地提出“A″褶皱起伏度( )”来量化褶皱空间起伏对突水的影响。将IAHP-EWM模型应用于良水径煤矿42205工作面顶板突水风险评价,评价结果表明,未疏排水时突水风险为“高”,疏排水后突水风险为“低”,与实际涌水量数据及评价结果一致,验证了模型的准确性。IAHP-EWM模型在42202、42203和42204工作面的应用结果验证了其在良水径矿区的普遍适用性,可为煤层开采过程中顶板水害防治效果评价提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/328f94c6e378/ao2c02270_0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/be5b7c47a0d7/ao2c02270_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/49ab93c12982/ao2c02270_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/292d2ddc5a82/ao2c02270_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/acc7c884320a/ao2c02270_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/dc6e6c637cde/ao2c02270_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/a3388921c3da/ao2c02270_0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/54404ffc64e8/ao2c02270_0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/0a65612d7461/ao2c02270_0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/df508727a7ea/ao2c02270_0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/0e76a5a62089/ao2c02270_0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/4a774c08dcfc/ao2c02270_0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/328f94c6e378/ao2c02270_0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/be5b7c47a0d7/ao2c02270_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/49ab93c12982/ao2c02270_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/292d2ddc5a82/ao2c02270_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/acc7c884320a/ao2c02270_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/dc6e6c637cde/ao2c02270_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/a3388921c3da/ao2c02270_0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/54404ffc64e8/ao2c02270_0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/0a65612d7461/ao2c02270_0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/df508727a7ea/ao2c02270_0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/0e76a5a62089/ao2c02270_0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/4a774c08dcfc/ao2c02270_0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93e1/9350886/328f94c6e378/ao2c02270_0013.jpg

相似文献

1
A Multifactor Quantitative Assessment Model for Safe Mining after Roof Drainage in the Liangshuijing Coal Mine.良水径煤矿顶板疏放后安全开采的多因素定量评价模型
ACS Omega. 2022 Jul 24;7(30):26437-26454. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02270. eCollection 2022 Aug 2.
2
Water-inrush mechanism from the head-on working face roof in a Jurassic coal seam in the Ordos Basin.鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪煤层回采工作面顶板突水机制
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 12;19(3):e0298399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298399. eCollection 2024.
3
An approach for water-inrush risk assessment of deep coal seam mining: a case study in Xinlongzhuang coal mine.深部煤层开采突水风险评估方法:以新龙庄煤矿为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(34):43163-43176. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10225-0. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Mine Water Inrush Risk Assessment Evaluation Based on the GIS and Combination Weight-Cloud Model: A Case Study.基于GIS与组合权重-云模型的矿井突水风险评估:案例研究
ACS Omega. 2021 Nov 19;6(48):32671-32681. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04357. eCollection 2021 Dec 7.
5
Multifactor Prediction of the Water Richness of Coal Roof Aquifers Based on the Combination Weighting Method and TOPSIS Model: A Case Study in the Changcheng No. 1 Coal Mine.基于组合赋权法和TOPSIS模型的煤层顶板含水层富水性多因素预测——以长城一号煤矿为例
ACS Omega. 2022 Nov 29;7(49):44984-45003. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05297. eCollection 2022 Dec 13.
6
Evaluation on the Risk of Water Inrush Due to Roof Bed Separation Based on Improved Set Pair Analysis-Variable Fuzzy Sets.基于改进集对分析-可变模糊集的顶板离层突水风险评价
ACS Omega. 2022 Mar 9;7(11):9430-9442. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06700. eCollection 2022 Mar 22.
7
Gray Evaluation of Water Inrush Risk in Deep Mining Floor.深部开采底板突水风险的灰色评价
ACS Omega. 2021 May 25;6(22):13970-13986. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05853. eCollection 2021 Jun 8.
8
Water-richness evaluation method and application of clastic rock aquifer in mining seam roof.煤层顶板碎屑岩含水层富水性评价方法及应用
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57033-x.
9
Risk assessment of coal mine water inrush based on PCA-DBN.基于 PCA-DBN 的煤矿突水风险评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):1370. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05473-8.
10
Study of roof water inrush forecasting based on EM-FAHP two-factor model.基于EM-FAHP双因素模型的顶板突水预测研究
Math Biosci Eng. 2021 Jun 7;18(5):4987-5005. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021254.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Grouting Reinforcement Effectiveness in Coal Seam Floors Using the Monte Carlo Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Case Study of the Rongkang Coal Mine.
ACS Omega. 2025 Jul 17;10(29):31410-31427. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c00099. eCollection 2025 Jul 29.
2
Evaluation of water richness in coal seam roof aquifer based on factor optimization and random forest method.基于因子优化和随机森林方法的煤层顶板含水层富水性评价
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 18;14(1):24421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75197-4.
3
Risk assessment of karst water inrush in tunnel engineering based on improved game theory and uncertainty measure theory.基于改进博弈论和不确定性测度理论的隧道工程岩溶突水风险评估

本文引用的文献

1
Method for Evaluating Fault Hydraulic Conductive Property and Its Application in Shandong, China.断层导水特性评价方法及其在中国山东的应用
ACS Omega. 2022 May 25;7(22):18292-18305. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00160. eCollection 2022 Jun 7.
2
3D Quantitative Prediction of the Groundwater Potential Area-A Case Study of a Simple Geological Structure Aquifer.地下水潜力区的三维定量预测——以简单地质结构含水层为例
ACS Omega. 2022 May 17;7(21):18004-18016. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01387. eCollection 2022 May 31.
3
Evaluation on the Risk of Water Inrush Due to Roof Bed Separation Based on Improved Set Pair Analysis-Variable Fuzzy Sets.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 31;14(1):20284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71214-8.
4
Evaluation of Heterogeneity in Tectonically Deformed Coal Reservoirs Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process-Entropy Weight Method Coupling Model: A Case Study.基于层次分析法-熵权法耦合模型的构造变形煤储层非均质性评价——以某地区为例
ACS Omega. 2023 Sep 28;8(40):36700-36709. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02764. eCollection 2023 Oct 10.
基于改进集对分析-可变模糊集的顶板离层突水风险评价
ACS Omega. 2022 Mar 9;7(11):9430-9442. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06700. eCollection 2022 Mar 22.
4
Physical simulation study on grouting water plugging of flexible isolation layer in coal seam mining.煤层开采中柔性隔离层注浆堵水的物理模拟研究
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 18;12(1):875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04813-y.
5
Facies-Controlled Geostatistical Porosity Model for Estimation of the Groundwater Potential Area in Hongliu Coalmine, Ordos Basin, China.基于相控的地质统计学孔隙度模型用于估算中国鄂尔多斯盆地红柳煤矿的地下水潜力区
ACS Omega. 2021 Apr 8;6(15):10013-10029. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06166. eCollection 2021 Apr 20.