School of Medicine and Medical Science (SMMS), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
School of Sociology, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Ir J Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;40(3):508-512. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2022.35. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been increased interest in identifying ways of protecting the mental well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs). Much of this has been directed towards promoting and enhancing the resilience of those deemed as frontline workers. Based on a review of the extant literature, this paper seeks to problematise aspects of how 'frontline work' and 'resilience' are currently conceptualised. Firstly, frontline work is arbitrarily defined and often narrowly focused on acute, hospital-based settings, leading to the needs of HCWs in other sectors of the healthcare system being overlooked. Secondly, dominant narratives are often underpinned by a reductionist understanding of the concept of resilience, whereby solutions are built around addressing the perceived deficiencies of (frontline) HCWs rather than the structural antecedents of distress. The paper concludes by considering what interventions are appropriate to minimise the risk of burnout across all sectors of the healthcare system in a post-pandemic environment.
自 COVID-19 大流行以来,人们越来越关注如何保护医护人员(HCWs)的心理健康。其中很大一部分致力于促进和增强那些被认为是一线工作人员的韧性。基于对现有文献的回顾,本文旨在探讨当前“前线工作”和“韧性”概念的某些方面。首先,前线工作被任意定义,而且往往狭隘地集中在急性的、基于医院的环境中,导致医疗保健系统其他部门的 HCWs 的需求被忽视。其次,主导性叙事往往基于对韧性概念的简化理解,即解决方案围绕着解决(前线)HCWs 被认为的缺陷,而不是围绕着压力的结构性前因。本文最后考虑在大流行环境下,为了最小化所有医疗保健系统部门的倦怠风险,应该采取哪些干预措施。