O'Donnell Shane, Quigley Etain, Hayden John, Adamis Dimitrios, Gavin Blánaid, McNicholas Fiona
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Law and Criminology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
BJPsych Open. 2023 Mar 6;9(2):e49. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.11.
Research has begun to draw attention to the challenges mental health professionals faced in delivering services during the COVID-19 pandemic response. However, few studies have examined the specific experiences of consultant psychiatrists.
To examine the work-related experiences and psychosocial needs of consultant psychiatrists situated in the Republic of Ireland arising from the COVID-19 response.
We interviewed 18 consultant psychiatrists and analysed data using inductive thematic analysis.
Work-related experience of participants was characterised by increased workload associated with assumption of guardianship of physical and mental health of vulnerable patients. Unintended consequences of public health restrictions increased case complexity, limited availability of alternative supports and hindered the practice of psychiatry, including inhibiting peer support systems for psychiatrists. Participants perceived available psychological supports as generally unsuitable for their needs given their specialty. Long-standing under-resourcing, mistrust in management and high levels of burnout exacerbated the psychological burden of the COVID-19 response.
The challenges of leading mental health services were evident in the increased complexity involved in caring for vulnerable patients during the pandemic, contributing to uncertainty, loss of control and moral distress among participants. These dynamics worked synergistically with pre-existing system-level failures, eroding capacity to mount an effective response. The longer-term psychological well-being of consultant psychiatrists - as well as the pandemic preparedness of healthcare systems - is contingent on implementation of policies addressing long-standing under-investment in the services vulnerable populations rely on, not least community mental health services.
研究已开始关注心理健康专业人员在应对新冠疫情期间提供服务时所面临的挑战。然而,很少有研究考察过顾问精神科医生的具体经历。
考察爱尔兰共和国的顾问精神科医生因应对新冠疫情而产生的与工作相关的经历和心理社会需求。
我们采访了18名顾问精神科医生,并采用归纳主题分析法对数据进行了分析。
参与者的工作相关经历的特点是工作量增加,这与承担弱势患者身心健康监护责任有关。公共卫生限制措施产生的意外后果增加了病例的复杂性,限制了替代支持的可用性,并阻碍了精神病学实践,包括抑制了精神科医生的同伴支持系统。参与者认为,鉴于他们的专业特点,现有的心理支持总体上不适合他们的需求。长期资源不足、对管理层的不信任以及高度倦怠加剧了应对新冠疫情带来的心理负担。
在疫情期间照顾弱势患者的复杂性增加,这凸显了领导心理健康服务的挑战,导致参与者出现不确定性、失去控制感和道德困扰。这些动态因素与预先存在的系统层面的失灵协同作用,削弱了有效应对的能力。顾问精神科医生的长期心理健康以及医疗系统应对疫情的准备情况,取决于实施相关政策,解决对弱势群体所依赖的服务(尤其是社区心理健康服务)长期投资不足的问题。