Bonnel A M, Mathiot M J, Jungas B, Grimaud C
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1987 Jan-Feb;23(1):23-9.
In asthmatic patients, Helson's adaptation level theory was applied to breathing discomfort to investigate the discrepancy between the subjective severity of breathlessness and their objective airflow obstruction. The data from a signal detection methodology show a considerable loss of sensitivity in twelve asthmatic patients with permanent airflow obstruction compared to the high sensitivity of six normal subjects to the same four external resistive loads (range 2.5 to 8.0 cmH2O X l-1 X s). Furthermore, when subjective ratings are examined, the absence of any contrast effect between adjacent load intensities in asthmatics suggests that these subjects evaluate the discomfort induced by the loads with reference to a strong internal comparison (adaptation level) rather than to the experimental stimuli. There was no relationship between physiological parameters and the low sensitivity of asthmatics. Also salbutamol-induced bronchodilation in six asthmatics did not improve sensitivity or induce any contrast effect. These two observations bring out the necessity to consider the role of past experience of breathing discomfort on adaptation level and sensitivity.
在哮喘患者中,将赫尔森的适应水平理论应用于呼吸不适,以研究呼吸急促的主观严重程度与其客观气流阻塞之间的差异。信号检测方法的数据显示,与六名正常受试者对相同四种外部阻力负荷(范围为2.5至8.0 cmH₂O×l⁻¹×s)的高敏感性相比,十二名患有永久性气流阻塞的哮喘患者的敏感性有相当大的损失。此外,当检查主观评分时,哮喘患者相邻负荷强度之间没有任何对比效应,这表明这些受试者是参照强烈的内部比较(适应水平)而非实验刺激来评估负荷引起的不适。生理参数与哮喘患者的低敏感性之间没有关系。同样,六名哮喘患者中沙丁胺醇诱导的支气管扩张并未提高敏感性或产生任何对比效应。这两个观察结果表明有必要考虑过去呼吸不适经历对适应水平和敏感性的作用。