Department of Anesthesiology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jul;26(5):1051-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Cancer pain has traditionally been managed with opioids, adjuvant medications, and interventions including injections, neural blockade, and intrathecal pump (ITP). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), although increasingly used for conditions such as failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome, is not currently recommended for cancer pain. However, patients with cancer-related pain have demonstrated benefit with SCS. We sought to better characterize these patients and the benefit of SCS in exceptional cases of refractory pain secondary to progression of disease or evolving treatment-related complications.
This was a single-center, retrospective case series at a tertiary cancer center. Adults ≥18 years old with active cancer and evolving pain secondary to disease progression or treatment, whose symptoms were refractory to systemic opioids, and who underwent SCS trial followed by percutaneous implantation between 2016 and 2021 were included. Descriptive statistics included mean, SD, median, and interquartile range (IQR).
Eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age at SCS trial was 60.0 (SD: ±11.6) years, and 50% were men. Compared with baseline, the median (IQR) change in pain score by numeric rating scale (NRS) after trial was -3 (2). At an average of 14 days after implant, the median (IQR) change in NRS and daily oral morphine equivalents were -2 (3.5) and -126 mg (1095 mg), respectively. At a median of 63 days after implant, the corresponding values were -3 (0.75) and -96 mg (711 mg). There was no significant change in adjuvant therapies after SCS implantation at follow-up. Six patients were discharged within two days after implantation. Two patients were readmitted for pain control within the follow-up period.
In patients with cancer-related pain, SCS may significantly relieve pain, reduce systemic daily opioid consumption, and potentially decrease hospital length of stay and readmission for pain control. It may be appropriate to consider an SCS trial before ITP in select cases of cancer-related pain.
癌症疼痛传统上采用阿片类药物、辅助药物和干预措施(包括注射、神经阻滞和鞘内泵)进行治疗。脊髓刺激(SCS)虽然越来越多地用于治疗失败的背部手术综合征和复杂区域疼痛综合征等疾病,但目前不推荐用于癌症疼痛。然而,患有癌症相关疼痛的患者在 SCS 治疗中受益。我们试图更好地描述这些患者,并在疾病进展或治疗相关并发症演变导致难治性疼痛的特殊情况下,更好地描述 SCS 的获益。
这是一项在三级癌症中心进行的单中心回顾性病例系列研究。纳入标准为:年龄≥18 岁,患有活动性癌症,且疼痛因疾病进展或治疗而不断加剧,全身阿片类药物治疗无效,并于 2016 年至 2021 年期间接受 SCS 试验和随后的经皮植入。描述性统计包括平均值、标准差、中位数和四分位数间距(IQR)。
8 例患者符合纳入标准。SCS 试验时的平均年龄为 60.0(SD:±11.6)岁,50%为男性。与基线相比,试验后数字评分量表(NRS)的疼痛评分中位数(IQR)变化为-3(2)。在植入后平均 14 天,NRS 和每日口服吗啡等效物的中位数(IQR)变化分别为-2(3.5)和-126mg(1095mg)。在植入后中位数 63 天,相应的值分别为-3(0.75)和-96mg(711mg)。SCS 植入后随访时辅助治疗无明显变化。6 例患者在植入后两天内出院。2 例患者在随访期间因疼痛控制再次入院。
对于癌症相关疼痛患者,SCS 可能显著缓解疼痛,减少全身每日阿片类药物的使用,潜在地降低住院时间和疼痛控制的再入院率。在某些癌症相关疼痛的情况下,在考虑植入 IT 泵之前,可能适合考虑 SCS 试验。