Suppr超能文献

2019冠状病毒病、低收入和中等收入国家的国家(不)可见性与结构性暴力

COVID-19, state (in)visibility and structural violence in low- and middle-income countries.

作者信息

Pincock Kate, Jones Nicola, Mitu Khadija, Guglielmi Silvia, Iyasu Abreham

机构信息

Gender and Adolescence Global Evidence (GAGE), ODI London UK.

Department of Anthropology University of Chittagong Bangladesh.

出版信息

Int Soc Sci J. 2022 Jul 26. doi: 10.1111/issj.12358.

Abstract

The socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 on adolescents and youth in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) who have migrated for work, are among the urban poor, or have been forcibly displaced is not well understood. To address this knowledge gap, this article draws on in-depth qualitative interviews undertaken between April and July 2020 with 249 adolescent girls and boys and 24 community key informants in Bangladesh and Ethiopia. These two countries have divergent social protection systems and thus provide a useful comparative lens to understand state provisioning for the most disadvantaged, including vulnerable young people, in crisis contexts. Despite rapid implementation of restrictions to halt viral spread, the mobilisation of social protection in response to the pandemic's socioeconomic effects has lagged. Using a lens of structural violence, findings underscore that socially marginalised young people are the most disadvantaged by state failures to deliver essential services or protection. There has also been insufficient support from humanitarian and development actors in responding to the challenges of the pandemic. The article concludes that identifying and addressing how structural inequalities shape access to and inclusion in social protection mechanisms can contribute to more effectively targeted measures to support the most disadvantaged, especially during crises.

摘要

2019冠状病毒病对低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)中为工作而移民、属于城市贫困人口或被迫流离失所的青少年和青年的社会经济影响,目前尚不清楚。为了填补这一知识空白,本文借鉴了2020年4月至7月期间对孟加拉国和埃塞俄比亚的249名青少年男女以及24名社区关键信息提供者进行的深入定性访谈。这两个国家有着不同的社会保护体系,因此提供了一个有用的比较视角,以了解在危机情况下,国家为包括弱势年轻人在内的最弱势群体提供的保障。尽管迅速实施了限制措施以阻止病毒传播,但在应对疫情的社会经济影响方面,社会保护的动员却滞后了。研究结果从结构性暴力的角度强调,社会边缘化的年轻人是国家未能提供基本服务或保护的最大受害者。人道主义和发展行为体在应对疫情挑战方面的支持也不足。文章得出结论,确定并解决结构性不平等如何影响社会保护机制的获取和纳入,可以促成更有针对性的措施,以支持最弱势群体,尤其是在危机期间。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.一个基于网络的交互式仪表盘,用于实时追踪新冠病毒。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Structural violence and clinical medicine.结构性暴力与临床医学
PLoS Med. 2006 Oct;3(10):e449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030449.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验