• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 上关于口腔念珠菌病的信息可靠吗?

Does YouTube™ provide reliable information on oral candidiasis?

机构信息

Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, İstanbul Atlas University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Oral Dis. 2023 Jan;29(1):290-299. doi: 10.1111/odi.14338. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1111/odi.14338
PMID:35942887
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality, source, usefulness and/or reliability, visibility, and popularity of YouTube™ videos on oral candidiasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A YouTube™ search for "oral candidiasis" was performed, setting the English language. 133 of the 351 videos watched were included in the study. Two periodontologists scored the videos for visibility, popularity, quality, utility, and reliability. Videos' quality was evaluated using the DISCERN and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) tools, by categorizing them through quality assessment, source, duration, views, likes, and dislikes of each video were noted.

RESULTS

82.7% of the videos were moderately or very useful, and the GQS scores were mostly good (41.4%-Score 4) and excellent (42.1%-Score 5). Significant relationships were obtained between Source of Upload, Video Type, Total Discern, and GQS variables and Usefulness scores (p < 0.05). The 53.4% of the video sources were Healthcare professionals and their video usefulness scores were mostly "moderately useful" (47.9%) and "very useful" (%42.3). There was a significant positive correlation between the usefulness scores of the videos and the number of likes (p = 0.004), comments (p = 0.019), and the viewing rate (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The videos that rank high in searches for oral candidiasis on YouTube™ are mostly useful and comprehensive videos uploaded for educational purposes.

摘要

目的

评估 YouTube™ 视频中关于口腔念珠菌病的质量、来源、有用性和/或可靠性、可见度和流行度。

材料与方法

在 YouTube™ 上进行了“口腔念珠菌病”的搜索,设置为英语语言。观看的 351 个视频中有 133 个被纳入研究。两位牙周病学家对视频的可见度、流行度、质量、实用性和可靠性进行评分。使用 DISCERN 和全球质量量表(GQS)工具评估视频质量,通过对每个视频的质量评估、来源、时长、观看次数、点赞数和点赞数进行分类。

结果

82.7%的视频被评为中度或非常有用,GQS 评分大多为良好(41.4%-评分 4)和优秀(42.1%-评分 5)。上传来源、视频类型、总辨别力和 GQS 变量与有用性评分之间存在显著关系(p<0.05)。视频来源的 53.4%为医疗保健专业人员,其视频有用性评分大多为“中度有用”(47.9%)和“非常有用”(42.3%)。视频有用性评分与点赞数(p=0.004)、评论数(p=0.019)和观看率(p=0.006)之间存在显著正相关。

结论

在 YouTube™ 上搜索口腔念珠菌病排名较高的视频大多是为教育目的上传的有用且全面的视频。

相似文献

1
Does YouTube™ provide reliable information on oral candidiasis?YouTube 上关于口腔念珠菌病的信息可靠吗?
Oral Dis. 2023 Jan;29(1):290-299. doi: 10.1111/odi.14338. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Assessment of usefulness and reliability of YouTube™ videos on denture care.评估 YouTube™ 视频在假牙护理方面的有用性和可靠性。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2024 Feb;22(1):106-115. doi: 10.1111/idh.12771. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
Cross-sectional study on the quality of oral lichen planus videos on YouTube™.YouTubeTM 上口腔扁平苔藓视频质量的横断面研究。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2021 Feb;50(2):220-228. doi: 10.1111/jop.13128. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Is the YouTube™ an useful source of information on oral leukoplakia?YouTube 是否是口腔白斑信息的有用来源?
Oral Dis. 2019 Nov;25(8):1897-1905. doi: 10.1111/odi.13161. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Evaluation of the quality of YouTube™ videos about pit and fissure sealant applications.评价 YouTube™ 视频中窝沟封闭剂应用相关内容的质量。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Aug;21(3):590-598. doi: 10.1111/idh.12646. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
6
Evaluation of the usefulness and quality of YouTube™ videos about children's electric toothbrushes.评估关于儿童电动牙刷的 YouTube™ 视频的有用性和质量。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2024 May;22(2):423-431. doi: 10.1111/idh.12756. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
7
Reliability of information on YouTube™ regarding pediatric dental trauma.YouTube™ 上有关儿童牙外伤信息的可靠性。
Dent Traumatol. 2021 Dec;37(6):772-778. doi: 10.1111/edt.12708. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
YouTube™ Videos as a Source of Information on Necrotizing Gingivitis: A Content-Quality Analysis.YouTube™ 视频作为坏死性龈炎信息来源的内容质量分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 1;16(6):e61485. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61485. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review.YouTube 作为耳念珠菌感染信息源:一项系统性综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08731-4.
10
Does YouTube™ Provide Adequate Information on Oral Health During Pregnancy?YouTube™ 是否提供了关于孕期口腔健康的充分信息?
Cureus. 2024 Apr 9;16(4):e57887. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57887. eCollection 2024 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Ameloblastoma on YouTube: content analysis and strategies to address misinformation.YouTube上的成釉细胞瘤:内容分析与应对错误信息的策略
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Apr 22;29(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01381-z.
2
Global quality scores of Brazilian public health system-related YouTubeTM videos and their users' engagement.巴西公共卫生系统相关YouTube™视频的全球质量评分及其用户参与度。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Dec 9;38:e099. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0099. eCollection 2024.
3
Is YouTube a sufficient source of information on Sarcoidosis?
YouTube 上有关结节病的信息足够丰富吗?
Respir Res. 2024 Sep 9;25(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02956-2.
4
A Social Media Content Analysis of Dental Health Information Involving the Use of Miswak (Salvadora persica) Chewing Stick on YouTube™.关于YouTube™上涉及使用米斯瓦克(佩里扁桃)咀嚼棒的口腔健康信息的社交媒体内容分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64743. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64743. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
YouTube™ Videos as a Source of Information on Necrotizing Gingivitis: A Content-Quality Analysis.YouTube™ 视频作为坏死性龈炎信息来源的内容质量分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 1;16(6):e61485. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61485. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Does YouTube™ Provide Adequate Information on Oral Health During Pregnancy?YouTube™ 是否提供了关于孕期口腔健康的充分信息?
Cureus. 2024 Apr 9;16(4):e57887. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57887. eCollection 2024 Apr.