• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于YouTube™上涉及使用米斯瓦克(佩里扁桃)咀嚼棒的口腔健康信息的社交媒体内容分析

A Social Media Content Analysis of Dental Health Information Involving the Use of Miswak (Salvadora persica) Chewing Stick on YouTube™.

作者信息

Alwadi Maram A, AlJameel AlBandary H, Alshammari Falah R, Chavarria Enmanuel A, Aboul-Enein Basil H

机构信息

Department of Dental Health, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64743. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64743. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.64743
PMID:39156305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11328981/
Abstract

Background The widespread availability of Internet access and the rising popularity of social media platforms have facilitated the dissemination of health-related information, including dental health practices. However, assessing the quality and effectiveness of such information remains a challenge, particularly concerning traditional practices such as Miswak () usage. This study aims to assess the description, use, and effectiveness of the Miswak () chewing stick posted as video clips on YouTube™ and provide considerations for future interventions. Methodology YouTube videos were searched using the terms "Miswak," "Siwak," "Salvadora persica," and "Chewing stick." Each video's descriptive features, i.e., title, links, country of origin, upload date, running time, views, comments, likes, and dislikes, were recorded. Content quality was assessed using the DISCERN tool, which rates the reliability, dependability, and trustworthiness of online sources across 16 items. Scores were aggregated for analysis. The statistical analysis examined video features and associations between the speaker, video type, source, and quality, with significance set at a p-value <0.05 using SPSS Statistics Version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 45 videos were included in the study, with the majority (62%) created by the "other professionals" category. Almost three-quarters (73.3%) of the videos were educational. The quality of the video clips was correlated with the speaker source and category of "other," revealing that high-quality information was considered such when the source was other than a dentist. Further, we found that a video's source did not elicit differences in the opinion of the video's quality. Conclusions This social media analysis provides considerations and implications for future research on the potential use of YouTube as a platform for Miswak educational interventions.

摘要

背景 互联网接入的广泛普及以及社交媒体平台日益流行,促进了包括牙齿健康做法在内的健康相关信息的传播。然而,评估此类信息的质量和有效性仍然是一项挑战,尤其是对于诸如使用米斯瓦克(Miswak)等传统做法而言。本研究旨在评估在YouTube™上作为视频片段发布的米斯瓦克咀嚼棒的描述、使用情况及有效性,并为未来的干预措施提供参考。方法 使用“米斯瓦克”(Miswak)、“西瓦克”(Siwak)、“佩里蒙黄连木”(Salvadora persica)和“咀嚼棒”等术语在YouTube视频中进行搜索。记录每个视频的描述性特征,即标题、链接、原产国、上传日期、时长、浏览量、评论、点赞数和点踩数。使用DISCERN工具评估内容质量,该工具根据16项内容对在线来源的可靠性、可信度和可信赖性进行评分。汇总分数进行分析。使用SPSS Statistics Version 20(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行统计分析,检验视频特征以及发言者、视频类型、来源和质量之间的关联,显著性设定为p值<0.05。结果 本研究共纳入45个视频,其中大多数(62%)由“其他专业人员”类别创建。几乎四分之三(73.3%)的视频是教育性的。视频片段的质量与发言者来源及“其他”类别相关,表明当来源不是牙医时,高质量信息才会被视为高质量。此外,我们发现视频来源并未引发有关视频质量看法的差异。结论 这项社交媒体分析为未来关于将YouTube作为米斯瓦克教育干预平台的潜在用途的研究提供了参考和启示。

相似文献

1
A Social Media Content Analysis of Dental Health Information Involving the Use of Miswak (Salvadora persica) Chewing Stick on YouTube™.关于YouTube™上涉及使用米斯瓦克(佩里扁桃)咀嚼棒的口腔健康信息的社交媒体内容分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64743. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64743. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Video clips of the Mediterranean Diet on YouTube : A social Media Content Analysis.YouTube 上的地中海饮食视频剪辑:社交媒体内容分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):366-374. doi: 10.1177/08901171221132113. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
A Double-Edged Sword: Quality and Credibility of Colon Cancer Screening Content on YouTube.一把双刃剑:YouTube上结肠癌筛查内容的质量与可信度
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54929. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Pain Management After Cesarean Birth: Content Analysis.关于剖宫产术后疼痛管理的YouTube视频内容质量:内容分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Jun 23;3:e40802. doi: 10.2196/40802.
5
Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Hepatosteatosis.将YouTube视频作为肝脂肪变性信息来源的评估
Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46843. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
7
Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information about dentin hypersensitivity.分析 YouTube 视频作为牙本质敏感信息的来源
Int J Dent Hyg. 2024 May;22(2):432-443. doi: 10.1111/idh.12723. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
8
YouTube Videos Related to the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Content Analysis.YouTube 上与福岛核灾难相关的视频:内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 7;7(6):e26481. doi: 10.2196/26481.
9
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.评估在YouTube上分享的葡萄膜炎视频中信息的质量、实用性和可靠性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis.YouTube 作为痛风信息来源的质量分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Jul;41(7):1321-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube as an information source in paediatric dentistry education: Reliability and quality analysis.YouTube 作为儿科学教育的信息来源:可靠性和质量分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 24;18(3):e0283300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283300. eCollection 2023.
2
Video clips of the Mediterranean Diet on YouTube : A social Media Content Analysis.YouTube 上的地中海饮食视频剪辑:社交媒体内容分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):366-374. doi: 10.1177/08901171221132113. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Does YouTube™ provide reliable information on oral candidiasis?
YouTube 上关于口腔念珠菌病的信息可靠吗?
Oral Dis. 2023 Jan;29(1):290-299. doi: 10.1111/odi.14338. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
's Biological Properties and Applications in Different Dental Specialties: A Narrative Review.[某物质]的生物学特性及其在不同牙科专业中的应用:一项叙述性综述
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 May 22;2022:8667687. doi: 10.1155/2022/8667687. eCollection 2022.
5
Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.YouTube 是健康相关信息的可靠来源吗?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z.
6
Youtube Content Analysis as a Means of Information in Oral Medicine: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Youtube 内容分析作为口腔医学信息手段:文献系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5451. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095451.
7
Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.Youtube 和 TikTok 上有关牙齿矫正的信息对公众的口腔健康可靠吗?一项横断面比较研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):e349-e354. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Analysis of Quality, Usefulness, Reliability, Visibility, and Popularity of Videos about Dental Caries on YouTube: A Cross-sectional Analysis.YouTube上关于龋齿视频的质量、实用性、可靠性、可见性和受欢迎程度分析:一项横断面分析。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Apr 8;12(2):245-251. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_246_21. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
9
YouTube™ as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: Quality and content analysis.YouTube™作为再生牙髓治疗程序的信息来源:质量与内容分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 May;161:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104732. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
10
YouTube for information on paediatric oral health instructions.在 YouTube 上查找有关儿科口腔健康指导的信息。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2022 Aug;20(3):496-503. doi: 10.1111/idh.12580. Epub 2022 Jan 26.