• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无动力节律控制对标准和低占空比模式神经刺激强度的影响,可延长瘫痪后肌肉驱动的循环输出。

Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis.

机构信息

Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, 10701 East Blvd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Kent State University, 800 E Summit St, Kent, OH, 44240, USA.

出版信息

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Aug 9;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01064-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12984-022-01064-w
PMID:35945575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9360711/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stimulation-driven exercise is often limited by rapid fatigue of the activated muscles. Selective neural stimulation patterns that decrease activated fiber overlap and/or duty cycle improve cycling exercise duration and intensity. However, unequal outputs from independently activated fiber populations may cause large discrepancies in power production and crank angle velocity among pedal revolutions. Enforcing a constant cadence through feedback control of stimulus levels may address this issue and further improve endurance by targeting a submaximal but higher than steady-state exercise intensity.

METHODS

Seven participants with paralysis cycled using standard cadence-controlled stimulation (S-Cont). Four of those participants also cycled with a low duty cycle (carousel) cadence-controlled stimulation scheme (C-Cont). S-Cont and C-Cont patterns were compared with conventional maximal stimulation (S-Max). Outcome measures include total work (W), end power (P), power fluctuation (PFI), charge accumulation (Q) and efficiency (η). Physiological measurements of muscle oxygenation (SmO) and heart rate were also collected with select participants.

RESULTS

At least one cadence-controlled stimulation pattern (S-Cont or C-Cont) improved P over S-Max in all participants and increased W in three participants. Both controlled patterns increased Q and η and reduced PFI compared with S-Max and prior open-loop studies. S-Cont stimulation also delayed declines in SmO2 and increased heart rate in one participant compared with S-Max.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadence-controlled selective stimulation improves cycling endurance and increases efficiency over conventional stimulation by incorporating fiber groups only as needed to maintain a desired exercise intensity. Closed-loop carousel stimulation also successfully reduces power fluctuations relative to previous open-loop efforts, which will enable neuroprosthesis recipients to better take advantage of duty cycle reducing patterns.

摘要

背景

受激运动通常会受到激活肌肉快速疲劳的限制。减少激活纤维重叠和/或占空比的选择性神经刺激模式可以提高自行车运动的持续时间和强度。然而,独立激活纤维群体的不均匀输出可能会导致在每圈踏板旋转中产生功率和曲柄角度速度的巨大差异。通过刺激水平的反馈控制来强制保持恒定的步频可能会解决这个问题,并通过针对低于最大但高于稳态运动强度的目标来进一步提高耐力。

方法

七名瘫痪患者使用标准节拍控制刺激(S-Cont)进行自行车运动。其中四人也使用低占空比(carousel)节拍控制刺激方案(C-Cont)进行自行车运动。将 S-Cont 和 C-Cont 模式与传统的最大刺激(S-Max)进行比较。测量指标包括总功(W)、终末功率(P)、功率波动(PFI)、电荷量(Q)和效率(η)。还选择了部分参与者进行肌肉氧合(SmO)和心率的生理测量。

结果

至少有一种节拍控制刺激模式(S-Cont 或 C-Cont)提高了所有参与者的 P ,并使三名参与者的 W 增加。与 S-Max 和以前的开环研究相比,两种控制模式都增加了 Q 和 η,降低了 PFI。与 S-Max 相比,S-Cont 刺激还延迟了 SmO2 的下降并增加了一名参与者的心率。

结论

节拍控制选择性刺激通过仅根据需要整合纤维群来维持所需的运动强度,从而提高了自行车运动的耐力并提高了效率。闭环 carousel 刺激还成功地降低了与以前的开环努力相比的功率波动,这将使神经假体接受者能够更好地利用占空比降低模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/431f7d0ad6a3/12984_2022_1064_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/80568aada3fd/12984_2022_1064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/506dae14a174/12984_2022_1064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/7ccd08434436/12984_2022_1064_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/9ccb099fa619/12984_2022_1064_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/3d5ce397ef03/12984_2022_1064_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/fcea49d43329/12984_2022_1064_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/484e6805e411/12984_2022_1064_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/431f7d0ad6a3/12984_2022_1064_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/80568aada3fd/12984_2022_1064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/506dae14a174/12984_2022_1064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/7ccd08434436/12984_2022_1064_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/9ccb099fa619/12984_2022_1064_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/3d5ce397ef03/12984_2022_1064_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/fcea49d43329/12984_2022_1064_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/484e6805e411/12984_2022_1064_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86c4/9361651/431f7d0ad6a3/12984_2022_1064_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis.无动力节律控制对标准和低占空比模式神经刺激强度的影响,可延长瘫痪后肌肉驱动的循环输出。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Aug 9;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01064-w.
2
Selective neural stimulation methods improve cycling exercise performance after spinal cord injury: a case series.选择性神经刺激方法改善脊髓损伤后的循环运动表现:病例系列。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jul 23;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00912-5.
3
The effects of crank power and cadence on muscle fascicle shortening velocity, muscle activation and joint-specific power during cycling.曲柄功率和踏频对骑行过程中肌小节缩短速度、肌肉激活和关节特定功率的影响。
J Exp Biol. 2023 Jul 1;226(13). doi: 10.1242/jeb.245600. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry.不同蹬踏速度对高强度自行车测力计功率-持续时间关系的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 1996 May;17(4):287-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972848.
5
Cadence, power, and muscle activation in cycle ergometry.蹬车测力法中的节奏、功率和肌肉激活
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Jul;32(7):1281-7. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200007000-00015.
6
Selective Nerve Cuff Stimulation Strategies for Prolonging Muscle Output.选择性神经袖刺激策略延长肌肉输出。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 May;67(5):1397-1408. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2937061. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
7
Musculoskeletal Effects of 2 Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Paradigms Conducted at Different Cadences for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.针对脊髓损伤患者以不同踏频进行的两种功能性电刺激骑行模式的肌肉骨骼效应:一项试点研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;97(9):1413-1422. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Maximizing muscle force via low-cadence functional electrical stimulation cycling.通过低踏频功能性电刺激骑行最大化肌肉力量。
J Rehabil Med. 2004 Sep;36(5):232-7. doi: 10.1080/16501970410029843.
9
The Effect of Cadence on the Mechanics and Energetics of Constant Power Cycling.定频踏频对恒功率踏车运动力学和能量学的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 May;51(5):941-950. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001863.
10
Muscle coordination limits efficiency and power output of human limb movement under a wide range of mechanical demands.在广泛的机械需求下,肌肉协调性会限制人类肢体运动的效率和功率输出。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Dec;114(6):3283-95. doi: 10.1152/jn.00765.2015. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective neural stimulation methods improve cycling exercise performance after spinal cord injury: a case series.选择性神经刺激方法改善脊髓损伤后的循环运动表现:病例系列。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jul 23;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00912-5.
2
Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness-related outcomes.脊髓损伤后功能性电刺激自行车运动:健康和健身相关结果的系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jun 12;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00882-8.
3
Sum of phase-shifted sinusoids stimulation prolongs paralyzed muscle output.
相移正弦波刺激的总和延长了瘫痪肌肉的输出。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Apr 10;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00679-1.
4
FES Cycling in Stroke: Novel Closed-Loop Algorithm Accommodates Differences in Functional Impairments.脑卒中的功能性电刺激自行车运动:新型闭环算法适应功能障碍的差异。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Mar;67(3):738-749. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2920346. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Controlling the Cadence and Admittance of a Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycle.控制功能性电刺激周期的节拍和导纳。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Jun;27(6):1181-1192. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2914579. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
Safety of long-term electrical peripheral nerve stimulation: review of the state of the art.长期电外周神经刺激的安全性:最新技术综述。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jan 18;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0474-8.
7
Stimulation of paralysed quadriceps muscles with sequentially and spatially distributed electrodes during dynamic knee extension.在动态膝关节伸展过程中,使用顺序和空间分布的电极刺激瘫痪的股四头肌。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jan 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0471-y.
8
Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury.靶向神经技术恢复脊髓损伤患者的行走能力。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Chronic complications of spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤的慢性并发症
World J Orthop. 2015 Jan 18;6(1):24-33. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.24.
10
Comparing the Induced Muscle Fatigue Between Asynchronous and Synchronous Electrical Stimulation in Able-Bodied and Spinal Cord Injured Populations.比较健全人群和脊髓损伤人群中异步与同步电刺激诱发的肌肉疲劳情况。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015 Nov;23(6):964-72. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2364735. Epub 2014 Oct 24.