Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 住院患者中评估研究性补体 C5 抑制剂zilucoplan 的疗效和安全性:一项开放标签随机对照试验。

Efficacy and safety of the investigational complement C5 inhibitor zilucoplan in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Laboratory of Mucosal Immunology, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2022 Aug 9;23(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02126-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of complement inhibition in COVID-19 patients is unclear.

METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled, open-label trial. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with signs of systemic inflammation and hypoxemia (PaO/FiO below 350 mmHg) were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive standard of care with or without the C5 inhibitor zilucoplan daily for 14 days, under antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was improvement in oxygenation at day 6 and 15.

RESULTS

81 patients were randomly assigned to zilucoplan (n = 55) or the control group (n = 26). 78 patients were included in the safety and primary analysis. Most were men (87%) and the median age was 63 years. The mean improvement in PaO/FiO from baseline to day 6 was 56.4 mmHg in the zilucoplan group and 20.6 mmHg in the control group (mean difference + 35.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 9.4 to 80.9; p = 0.12), an effect also observed at day 15. Day 28 mortality was 9% in the zilucoplan and 21% in the control group (odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI 0.1 to 1.5). At long-term follow up, the distance walked in a 6-min test was 539.7 m in zilucoplan and 490.6 m in the control group (p = 0.18). Zilucoplan lowered serum C5b-9 (p < 0.001) and interleukin-8 (p = 0.03) concentration compared with control. No relevant safety differences between the zilucoplan and control group were identified.

CONCLUSION

Administration of zilucoplan to COVID-19 patients in this proof-of-concept randomized trial was well tolerated under antibiotic prophylaxis. While not reaching statistical significance, indicators of respiratory function (PaO/FiO) and clinical outcome (mortality and 6-min walk test) suggest that C5 inhibition might be beneficial, although this requires further research in larger randomized studies.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 患者中补体抑制的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。

方法

这是一项多中心随机对照、开放性试验。有全身炎症和低氧血症(PaO/FiO<350mmHg)迹象的住院 COVID-19 患者,随机(2:1 比例)接受标准治疗,或在接受抗生素预防的情况下,每天接受 C5 抑制剂zilucoplan 治疗,持续 14 天。主要结局为第 6 天和第 15 天的氧合改善。

结果

81 名患者被随机分配至 zilucoplan(n=55)或对照组(n=26)。78 名患者纳入安全性和主要分析。大多数为男性(87%),中位年龄为 63 岁。zilucoplan 组从基线到第 6 天的 PaO/FiO 平均改善为 56.4mmHg,对照组为 20.6mmHg(平均差异+35.8;95%置信区间(CI)-9.4 至 80.9;p=0.12),第 15 天也观察到这种效果。第 28 天的死亡率在 zilucoplan 组为 9%,对照组为 21%(比值比 0.4;95%CI 0.1 至 1.5)。在长期随访中,zilucoplan 组 6 分钟步行测试的步行距离为 539.7m,对照组为 490.6m(p=0.18)。与对照组相比,zilucoplan 降低了血清 C5b-9(p<0.001)和白细胞介素-8(p=0.03)的浓度。zilucoplan 组和对照组之间未发现与安全性相关的差异。

结论

在这项概念验证性随机试验中,COVID-19 患者接受 zilucoplan 治疗,在抗生素预防下耐受性良好。虽然没有达到统计学意义,但呼吸功能(PaO/FiO)和临床结局(死亡率和 6 分钟步行测试)的指标表明,C5 抑制可能有益,尽管这需要在更大的随机研究中进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1707/9361665/75970ae99eb7/12931_2022_2126_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验