Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Front Immunol. 2021 Jun 7;12:696085. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696085. eCollection 2021.
Activation of the complement system has been observed in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression to investigate possible differences in the serum concentrations of two routinely measured complement components, C3 and C4, in COVID-19 patients with different severity and survival status. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, between January 2020 and February 2021, for studies reporting serum complement C3 and C4, measures of COVID-19 severity, and survival. Eligibility criteria were a) reporting continuous data on serum C3 and C4 concentrations in COVID-19 patients, -b) investigating COVID-19 patients with different disease severity and/or survival status, c) adult patients, d) English language, e) ≥10 patients, and f) full-text available. Using a random-effects model, standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate differences in serum C3 and C4 concentrations between COVID-19 patients with low vs. high severity or survivor vs. non-survivor status. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale whereas publication bias was assessed with the Begg's and Egger's tests. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Nineteen studies in 3,764 COVID-19 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Both C3 and C4 concentrations were significantly lower in patients with high disease severity or non-survivor status than patients with low severity or survivor status (C3 SMD=-0.40, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.21, p<0.001; C4 SMD=-0.29, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.09, p=0.005; moderate certainty of evidence). Extreme between-study heterogeneity was observed (C3, I = 82.1%; C4, I = 84.4%). Sensitivity analysis, performed by sequentially removing each study and re-assessing the pooled estimates, showed that the magnitude and direction of the effect size was not modified. There was no publication bias. In meta-regression, the SMD of C3 was significantly associated with white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and pro-thrombin time, whereas the SMD of C4 was significantly associated with CRP, pro-thrombin time, D-dimer, and albumin. In conclusion, lower concentrations of C3 and C4, indicating complement activation, were significantly associated with higher COVID-19 severity and mortality. C3 and C4 might be useful to predict adverse clinical consequences in these patients. PROSPERO, Registration number: CRD42021239634.
补体系统的激活已在 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中观察到。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,采用荟萃回归来研究不同严重程度和生存状态的 COVID-19 患者血清中两种常规测量的补体成分 C3 和 C4 的浓度是否存在差异。我们在 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 2 月期间,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 上检索了报告 COVID-19 患者血清补体 C3 和 C4、COVID-19 严重程度和生存情况的研究。纳入标准为:a)报告 COVID-19 患者血清 C3 和 C4 浓度的连续数据;b)研究不同严重程度和/或生存状态的 COVID-19 患者;c)成年患者;d)英文;e)≥10 例患者;f)可获取全文。使用随机效应模型,计算标准化均数差(SMD)及其 95%置信区间(CI),以评估 COVID-19 患者中低严重程度与高严重程度或幸存者与非幸存者之间血清 C3 和 C4 浓度的差异。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险,采用贝格和埃格检验评估发表偏倚。使用 GRADE 评估证据确定性。在 3764 例 COVID-19 患者中,有 19 项研究纳入荟萃分析。与低严重程度或幸存者相比,高严重程度或非幸存者的 C3 和 C4 浓度均显著降低(C3 SMD=-0.40,95%CI -0.60 至 -0.21,p<0.001;C4 SMD=-0.29,95%CI -0.49 至 -0.09,p=0.005;证据确定性为中等)。观察到非常显著的异质性(C3,I=82.1%;C4,I=84.4%)。通过依次删除每项研究并重新评估汇总估计值的敏感性分析表明,效应量的大小和方向没有改变。无发表偏倚。在荟萃回归中,C3 的 SMD 与白细胞计数、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和凝血酶原时间显著相关,而 C4 的 SMD 与 CRP、凝血酶原时间、D-二聚体和白蛋白显著相关。总之,补体激活的 C3 和 C4 浓度降低与 COVID-19 严重程度和死亡率升高显著相关。C3 和 C4 可能有助于预测这些患者的不良临床后果。PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42021239634。