Nanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 5;101(31):e29655. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029655.
The findings on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma, ozone, and hyaluronic acid in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee are controversial, and the existing original studies and meta-analyses are mostly comparisons of a single joint cavity injection method, lacking direct and indirect comparisons of different drugs in the joint cavity. The lack of direct and indirect comparisons of different drugs in the joint cavity makes it difficult to have a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of joint cavity injection methods. In this study, the efficacy of platelet-rich, ozone, sodium hyaluronate, and combined knee cavity injections were compared directly or indirectly using a reticulated meta-analysis in this field, and the efficacy of treatment measures was ranked to provide more comprehensive and reliable evidence-based clinical evidence for the selection of knee cavity injections in osteoarthritis of the knee.
To compare the effects of platelet-rich plasma, ozone, and sodium glassate injection interventions on the efficacy of osteoarthritis of the knee through reticulated Meta-analysis, and to comprehensively compare the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma, ozone, and sodium glassate injection joint cavity injection for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.
The PubMed, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wan-Fang databases were searched for information on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma, ozone, and sodium vitrate injection for the comparative treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, with a search time frame of each database from the date of creation to July 20, 2021. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated the quality of the literature in parallel. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software to compare the differences in the efficacy of each treatment measure using the ratio and 95% confidence interval as effect indicators and to rank the efficacy.
Thirty-three RCTs with 7003 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were included, involving 5 therapeutic measures. Meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injection was superior to both ozone and hyaluronic acid therapies. Hyaluronic acid+ozone and platelet-rich plasma+hyaluronic acid were both superior to ozone and hyaluronic acid monotherapy. The differences in efficacy between hyaluronic acid and ozone compared with platelet-rich plasma were statistically significant, and the differences in efficacy between the 2 combination therapies (platelet-rich plasma+hyaluronic acid, hyaluronic acid+ozone) and the 3 monotherapies (platelet-rich plasma, ozone, hyaluronic acid) were statistically significant. Platelet-rich plasma+hyaluronic acid, hyaluronic acid+ozone compared with 3 monotherapies (platelet-rich plasma, ozone, hyaluronic acid) were statistically significant, except for the difference in efficacy with platelet-rich plasma, which was not statistically significant, indicating that this platelet-rich plasma+hyaluronic acid and Hyaluronic acid+ozone combination therapy was superior to monotherapy. Also, the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma was better than hyaluronic acid and ozone and the difference was statistically significant, indicating that platelet-rich plasma was more effective than ozone and sodium glass in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee in monotherapy.
It is believed that in the course of clinical practice, hyaluronic acid+ozone or platelet-rich plasma+hyaluronic acid combination therapy or platelet-rich plasma therapy can be preferred for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
富血小板血浆、臭氧和透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎的有效性的研究结果存在争议,现有的原始研究和荟萃分析大多比较了单一关节腔注射方法,缺乏关节腔内不同药物的直接和间接比较。关节腔内不同药物缺乏直接和间接比较,使得对关节腔注射方法的疗效难以有更清晰和全面的了解。本研究采用网状荟萃分析直接或间接比较富血小板、臭氧、透明质酸钠膝关节腔注射的疗效,对治疗措施的疗效进行排序,为膝骨关节炎膝关节腔注射的选择提供更全面、更可靠的循证临床依据。
通过网状 Meta 分析比较富血小板血浆、臭氧和透明质酸钠注射干预对膝骨关节炎疗效的影响,全面比较富血小板血浆、臭氧和透明质酸钠关节腔注射治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。
检索 PubMed、CBM、CNKI、VIP 和万方数据库中关于富血小板血浆、臭氧和透明质酸钠关节腔内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效比较的信息,各数据库的检索时间范围为从创建日期到 2021 年 7 月 20 日。由 2 名研究者独立筛选文献,根据纳入和排除标准提取数据,并平行评估文献质量。使用 Stata 16.0 软件进行统计分析,以比值比和 95%置信区间作为效应指标,比较每种治疗措施疗效的差异,并对疗效进行排序。
纳入 33 项 RCT,共 7003 例膝骨关节炎患者,涉及 5 种治疗措施。Meta 分析显示,富血小板血浆注射的疗效优于臭氧和透明质酸钠治疗。透明质酸钠+臭氧和富血小板血浆+透明质酸钠均优于臭氧和透明质酸钠单独治疗。透明质酸钠和臭氧与富血小板血浆的疗效差异有统计学意义,透明质酸钠+臭氧和富血小板血浆+透明质酸钠与臭氧和透明质酸钠单独治疗的疗效差异有统计学意义。富血小板血浆+透明质酸钠、透明质酸钠+臭氧与 3 种单独治疗(富血小板血浆、臭氧、透明质酸钠)相比,差异均有统计学意义,除富血小板血浆外,富血小板血浆+透明质酸钠、透明质酸钠+臭氧与 3 种单独治疗(富血小板血浆、臭氧、透明质酸钠)的疗效差异均有统计学意义,提示富血小板血浆+透明质酸钠和透明质酸钠+臭氧联合治疗优于单独治疗。同时,富血小板血浆的疗效优于透明质酸钠和臭氧,差异有统计学意义,提示富血小板血浆在膝骨关节炎的治疗中优于臭氧和玻璃酸钠单药治疗。
在临床实践中,认为对于膝骨关节炎患者,可以优先选择透明质酸钠+臭氧或富血小板血浆+透明质酸钠联合治疗或富血小板血浆治疗。