• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼方向在三联骨盆截骨术中:术中透视是否可靠?

Acetabular orientation in triple pelvic osteotomy: is intraoperative fluoroscopy reliable?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3715-3723. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04568-1. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-022-04568-1
PMID:35947170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10293451/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In pelvic osteotomies, unfavorable balancing of the anterior and posterior acetabular wall can affect the longevity of the natural joint. This raises the question, whether intraoperative fluoroscopy is sufficiently accurate. The objective was to assess the correlation between acetabular parameters [lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), anterior wall index (AWI), posterior wall index (PWI)] acquired on intraoperative fluoroscopic images and postoperative pelvic radiographs and to analyze intra- and interobserver reliability of these parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective examination was conducted on 206 consecutive cases (176 patients) after triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO). Every patient received a pre- and postoperative pelvic radiograph in supine position in exactly the same technique. A highly standardized surgical sequence allowed consistent intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging. LCAE, AI, PWI and AWI were measured by an experienced orthopedic surgeon and an orthopedic surgeon in training. Statistics comprised a priori power analysis, Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

A total of 165 cases were included. ICC between the parameters of the fluoroscopic images and postoperative radiographs was for LCEA: 0.935, AI: 0.936, AWI: 0.725 and PWI: 0.878. Intraobserver ICC for all parameters ranged from 0.953 to 0.989, interobserver ICC from 0.798 to 0.968, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the surgical treatment of hip dysplasia by means of TPO, intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging has proven to be reliable and accurate. Intraobserver correlation was excellent for all parameters. The correlation between the intraoperative fluoroscopic images and postoperative radiographs ranged from good to excellent, with the lowest values for the acetabular wall indices (AWI and PWI).

摘要

目的

在骨盆截骨术中,如果前后髋臼壁的平衡不理想,可能会影响自然关节的寿命。这就提出了一个问题,即术中透视是否足够准确。目的是评估术中透视图像上获得的髋臼参数(外侧中心边缘角 [LCEA]、髋臼指数 [AI]、前壁指数 [AWI]、后壁指数 [PWI])与术后骨盆 X 线片之间的相关性,并分析这些参数的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。

方法

对 206 例(176 例患者)接受三骨盆截骨术(TPO)后的连续病例进行回顾性检查。每位患者均以相同的技术在仰卧位接受术前和术后骨盆 X 线片。高度标准化的手术顺序允许进行一致的术中透视成像。由经验丰富的骨科医生和骨科住院医生测量 LCEA、AI、PWI 和 AWI。统计分析包括先验功效分析、Bland-Altman 分析和组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

共纳入 165 例病例。透视图像和术后 X 线片参数之间的 ICC 为:LCEA:0.935,AI:0.936,AWI:0.725,PWI:0.878。所有参数的观察者内 ICC 范围为 0.953 至 0.989,观察者间 ICC 范围为 0.798 至 0.968。

结论

在 TPO 治疗髋关节发育不良的手术中,术中透视成像已被证明是可靠和准确的。所有参数的观察者内相关性均极佳。术中透视图像与术后 X 线片之间的相关性从良好到极好,髋臼壁指数(AWI 和 PWI)的相关性最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfa/10293451/6c48cc93cb37/402_2022_4568_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfa/10293451/9a721919d9ef/402_2022_4568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfa/10293451/303782b829f8/402_2022_4568_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfa/10293451/6c48cc93cb37/402_2022_4568_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfa/10293451/9a721919d9ef/402_2022_4568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfa/10293451/303782b829f8/402_2022_4568_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfa/10293451/6c48cc93cb37/402_2022_4568_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Acetabular orientation in triple pelvic osteotomy: is intraoperative fluoroscopy reliable?髋臼方向在三联骨盆截骨术中:术中透视是否可靠?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3715-3723. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04568-1. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
What Is the Reliability and Accuracy of Intraoperative Fluoroscopy in Evaluating Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Coverage During Periacetabular Osteotomy?髋关节周围截骨术中术中透视评估髋臼前、侧和后覆盖的可靠性和准确性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1138-1144. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000616.
3
What is the agreement between intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs in Bernese periacetabular osteotomy?经皮髋臼周围截骨术中透视与术后 X 线片的一致性如何?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 30;23(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06054-6.
4
Treatment of borderline hip dysplasia with triple pelvic osteotomy: preoperative values of acetabular index and lateral center edge angle can indicate overcorrection.三骨盆截骨术治疗髋关节发育不良:髋臼指数和外侧中心边缘角的术前值可表明过度矫正。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6139-6146. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04920-z. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Operative Fluoroscopic Correction Is Reliable and Correlates With Postoperative Radiographic Correction in Periacetabular Osteotomy.手术透视下矫正可靠,且与髋臼周围截骨术后的影像学矫正相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1100-1106. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5071-1.
6
Acetabular deficiency in borderline hip dysplasia is underestimated by lateral center edge angle alone.单纯外侧中心边缘角不能充分评估髋关节发育不良的髋臼发育不良。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3937-3944. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04652-6. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
7
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Allows the Reliable Assessment of Deformity Correction during Periacetabular Osteotomy.术中透视可在髋臼周围截骨术中对畸形矫正进行可靠评估。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4817. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164817.
8
Medialization of the Hip's Center with Periacetabular Osteotomy: Validation of Assessment with Plain Radiographs.髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节中心性脱位:平片评估的验证。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):1040-1049. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001572.
9
Do fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs correlate for periacetabular osteotomy corrections?髋臼周围截骨术后的透视与术后 X 线片是否相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3508-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2483-4. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
10
John Charnley Award: A Quantitative Fluoroscopic Tool Improves Acetabular Fragment Positioning in Periacetabular Osteotomy.约翰·查恩利奖:一种定量荧光透视工具可改善髋臼周围截骨术中髋臼骨折块的定位。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S16-S22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.052. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-dimensional acetabular reorientation during periacetabular osteotomy: an intraoperative navigation method using an external fixator for periacetabular osteotomy.髋臼周围截骨术中的三维髋臼再定位:一种使用外固定架的髋臼周围截骨术中的导航方法。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4969-4977. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05590-1. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy.年龄和髋臼矫正程度会影响三联骨盆截骨术后的骨愈合。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6599-6607. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04966-z. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
3
Effects of different pelvic osteotomies on acetabular morphology in developmental dysplasia of hip in children.

本文引用的文献

1
Ottawa classification for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.用于有症状髋臼发育不良评估的渥太华分类:观察者间和观察者内可靠性研究
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jun 8;9(5):242-249. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.95.BJR-2019-0155.R1. eCollection 2020 May.
2
One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.髋臼周围截骨术后三分之一的髋关节在30年时仍保持良好临床效果,无关节炎进展或无需转换为全髋关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1154-1168. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5169-5.
3
Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles.
不同骨盆截骨术对儿童发育性髋关节发育不良髋臼形态的影响。
World J Orthop. 2023 Apr 18;14(4):186-196. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i4.186.
髋臼覆盖度测量的差异:重新审视前后中心边缘角和外侧中心边缘角
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Jun 13;2(3):280-6. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv041. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?髋臼覆盖不足和覆盖过度的影像学参考值是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1234-46. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4038-3.
5
Anteverting periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular retroversion: results at ten years.髋臼前旋截骨术治疗症状性髋臼后旋:十年随访结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 5;96(21):1785-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00842.
6
Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt?哪些髋关节影像学参数无需针对骨盆旋转和倾斜进行校正?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1255-66. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3936-8.
7
Dilemmas in imaging for peri-acetabular osteotomy: the influence of patient position and imaging technique on the radiological features of hip dysplasia.髋臼周围截骨术影像学中的困境:患者体位和影像学技术对髋关节发育不良的影像学特征的影响。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Sep;96-B(9):1155-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.34269.
8
[Tönnis and Kalchschmidt triple pelvic osteotomy].[托尼斯和卡尔施密特三联骨盆截骨术]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Oct;25(5):457-68. doi: 10.1007/s00064-013-0240-9. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
Impingement adversely affects 10-year survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy for DDH.髋臼周围截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良后,撞击会对 10 年的存活率产生不利影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 May;471(5):1602-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2799-8. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
10
Do fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs correlate for periacetabular osteotomy corrections?髋臼周围截骨术后的透视与术后 X 线片是否相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3508-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2483-4. Epub 2012 Aug 28.