• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反馈对话中的自我评估:一种复杂的平衡。

Self-Assessment in Feedback Conversations: A Complicated Balance.

作者信息

Robb Katharine A, Rosenbaum Marcy E, Peters Lauren, Lenoch Susan, Lancianese Donna, Miller Jane L

机构信息

K.A. Robb is clinical assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3071-3429 .

M.E. Rosenbaum is professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8000-5711 .

出版信息

Acad Med. 2023 Feb 1;98(2):248-254. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004917. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004917
PMID:35947481
Abstract

PURPOSE

Learner-centered feedback models encourage educators to ask learners to self-assess at the start of feedback conversations. This study examines how learners perceive and respond to self-assessment prompts during feedback conversations and assesses medical students' perceptions of and approach to self-assessment used as the basis for these conversations.

METHOD

All rising second-, third-, and fourth-year medical students at a midwestern U.S. medical school were invited to participate in this study. Students participated in 1-on-1 interviews between June and August 2019 during which they were asked open-ended questions about their experiences with self-assessment and feedback during medical school. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, and comments related to self-assessment in feedback conversations were extracted. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent ideas and patterns within the transcripts, and all excerpts were reviewed and coded to ensure that the identified themes adequately captured the range of student responses.

RESULTS

A total of 25 students participated in the study. Although some students noted improvement in their self-assessment abilities with increasing experience, no consistent gender, race, or training-level differences were found in reported attitudes or preferences. Students identified many benefits of self-assessment and generally appreciated being asked to self-assess before receiving feedback. Students had varied responses to specific self-assessment prompts, with no clear preferences for any particular self-assessment questions. Students described weighing multiple factors, such as image concerns and worries about impact on subsequent evaluations, when deciding how to respond to self-assessment prompts.

CONCLUSIONS

The process by which learners formulate and share self-assessments in feedback conversations is not straightforward. Although educators should continue to elicit self-assessments in feedback discussions, they should recognize the limitations of these self-assessments and strive to create a safe environment in which learners feel empowered to share their true impressions.

摘要

目的

以学习者为中心的反馈模式鼓励教育工作者在反馈对话开始时要求学习者进行自我评估。本研究探讨学习者在反馈对话中如何看待和回应自我评估提示,并评估医学生对用作这些对话基础的自我评估的看法和方法。

方法

邀请美国中西部一所医学院所有即将升入大二、大三和大四的医学生参与本研究。学生们在2019年6月至8月期间参加了一对一访谈,访谈中他们被问及关于医学院期间自我评估和反馈经历的开放式问题。访谈进行了录音和转录,并提取了与反馈对话中自我评估相关的评论。采用主题分析法识别转录文本中反复出现的观点和模式,所有摘录都经过审查和编码,以确保所确定的主题充分涵盖学生回答的范围。

结果

共有25名学生参与了该研究。尽管一些学生指出随着经验的增加,他们的自我评估能力有所提高,但在报告的态度或偏好方面,未发现一致的性别、种族或培训水平差异。学生们指出了自我评估的许多好处,并且普遍赞赏在收到反馈之前被要求进行自我评估。学生们对特定的自我评估提示有不同的反应,对任何特定的自我评估问题没有明确的偏好。学生们描述了在决定如何回应自我评估提示时会权衡多个因素,如形象问题和担心对后续评估的影响。

结论

学习者在反馈对话中制定和分享自我评估的过程并不简单。尽管教育工作者应继续在反馈讨论中引导学生进行自我评估,但他们应认识到这些自我评估的局限性,并努力营造一个让学习者感到有能力分享其真实印象的安全环境。

相似文献

1
Self-Assessment in Feedback Conversations: A Complicated Balance.反馈对话中的自我评估:一种复杂的平衡。
Acad Med. 2023 Feb 1;98(2):248-254. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004917. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
2
Feedback conversations: First things first?反馈对话:先从最重要的事情开始?
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Oct;115:107849. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107849. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
Medical Students' Professional Development as Educators Revealed Through Reflections on Their Teaching Following a Students-as-Teachers Course.通过医学生作为教师课程后的教学反思揭示医学生作为教育者的专业发展
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):411-419. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1302801. Epub 2017 May 12.
4
Fostering a Feedback Mindset: A Qualitative Exploration of Medical Students' Feedback Experiences With Longitudinal Coaches.培养反馈思维:医学学生与纵向导师的反馈体验的定性探索。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1057-1065. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003012.
5
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
6
'I wish someone watched me interview:' medical student insight into observation and feedback as a method for teaching communication skills during the clinical years.“我希望有人观看我的面试:”医学生对观察和反馈作为临床阶段沟通技能教学方法的见解。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0813-z.
7
Learner Experiences of Preceptor Self-Disclosure of Personal Illness in Medical Education.学习者在医学教育中体验带教老师自我披露个人疾病的经历。
Acad Med. 2024 Mar 1;99(3):296-303. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005583. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
8
Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students' perceptions about feedback.大学生医学生对反馈的认知的成熟差异。
Med Educ. 2012 Jul;46(7):711-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04291.x.
9
A Proposed Conceptual Framework and Investigation of Upward Feedback Receptivity in Medical Education.医学教育中向上反馈接受度的概念框架及调查建议
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):359-61. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077134.
10
Work-based feedback conversations with GP teachers.基于工作的与全科教师的反馈对话。
Clin Teach. 2023 Jun;20(3):e13576. doi: 10.1111/tct.13576. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The heterogeneity in psychological distress among undergraduate nursing students: a latent profile analysis.本科护理专业学生心理困扰的异质性:一项潜在剖面分析。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03373-6.
2
Breaking Bad News to Learners: How Well Does the SPIKES Clinical Model Translate?向医学生传达坏消息:SPIKES临床模式的翻译效果如何?
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Dec 27;13(1):684-692. doi: 10.5334/pme.1521. eCollection 2024.
3
Informing factors and outcomes of self-assessment practices in medical education: a systematic review.
医学教育中自我评估实践的影响因素和结果:系统评价。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2421441. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2421441. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
4
What the experts see: A qualitative analysis of the behaviors of master adaptive learners in emergency medicine.专家所见:急诊医学中优秀适应性学习者行为的定性分析
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Feb 21;8(1):e10943. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10943. eCollection 2024 Feb.