• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

判决书 112-122.

Judicial Opinions 112-122.

机构信息

Departamento de Microbiología y Ecología, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.

Institut für Mikrobiologie, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022 Aug;72(8). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005481.

DOI:10.1099/ijsem.0.005481
PMID:35947640
Abstract

Opinion 112 denies the request to place Aristovskaya and Parinkina 1963 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names because the information provided is insufficient. For the same reason, Opinion 113 denies the request to reject Lee . 2006 and Opinion 114 denies the request to reject the name Khunthongpan . 2014. Opinion 115 rejects the epithet of (Wiegel . 1981) Collins . 1994, which is regarded as a . To assess the consequences of Rule 8, Opinion 116 revisits names of taxa above the rank of genus which should comprise the stem of the name of a nomenclatural type and a category-specific ending but fail to do so. Such names should be orthographically corrected if the sole error is the inadvertent usage of an incorrect stem or be regarded as illegitimate if otherwise. The necessary corrections are made for a number of names. In Opinion 117, the request to designate Hirayama . 2011 as the type species of the genus is denied because an equivalent action compatible with the Code was already conducted. In Opinion 118, the possible orthographical correction of the name is treated, as are the analogous cases of and . The genus names are corrected to , and , respectively. Opinion 119 concludes that assigning Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980) as nomenclatural type of the class Stackebrandt . 1997 would not render that name legitimate if Rule 8 remained retroactive. The request is granted but is also assigned as type of Krassilnikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980). In Opinion 120, the possible orthographical correction of the name is treated. It is grammatically corrected to . Six names which could according to Rule 61 be grammatically corrected by anyone are also corrected. Opinion 121 denies the request to revise Opinion 69 and notes that Opinion 69 does not have the undesirable consequences emphasized in the request. In Opinion 122, the request to reject various taxon names of proposed in 2018 is denied because it is based on misinterpretations of the Code, which are clarified. Alternative ways to solve the perceived problems are outlined. These Opinions were ratified by the voting members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.

摘要

意见 112 拒绝将 Aristovskaya 和 Parinkina 1963(1980 年批准名单)列入被拒绝名称的请求,因为提供的信息不足。出于同样的原因,意见 113 拒绝了拒绝 Lee. 2006 的请求,意见 114 拒绝了拒绝名称 Khunthongpan. 2014 的请求。意见 115 拒绝了(Wiegel. 1981)Collins. 1994 的绰号,因为它被视为一个。为了评估规则 8 的后果,意见 116 重新审议了高于属级别的分类群名称,这些名称应该包含命名模式的词干和特定类别的结尾,但未能这样做。如果唯一的错误是无意使用了不正确的词干,则应进行正字法校正,否则应视为非法。对一些名称进行了必要的校正。在意见 117 中,拒绝将 Hirayama. 2011 指定为属种,因为已经进行了与代码兼容的等效操作。在意见 118 中,处理了名称的可能正字法校正问题,以及类似的和情况。属名分别更正为、和。意见 119 的结论是,如果规则 8 仍然具有追溯效力,将 Buchanan 1917(1980 年批准名单)指定为 Stackebrandt. 1997 类的命名模式将不会使该名称合法化。请求被批准,但也将 分配为 Krassilnikov 1949(1980 年批准名单)的类型。在意见 120 中,处理了名称的可能正字法校正问题。它被语法上更正为。根据规则 61 可以由任何人语法更正的六个名称也进行了更正。意见 121 拒绝修改意见 69 的请求,并指出意见 69 没有请求中强调的不良后果。在意见 122 中,拒绝了 2018 年提出的各种分类群名称的请求,因为它基于对代码的误解,这些误解得到了澄清。概述了解决所感知问题的替代方法。这些意见得到了国际原核生物系统学委员会投票成员的批准。

相似文献

1
Judicial Opinions 112-122.判决书 112-122.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022 Aug;72(8). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005481.
2
Judicial Opinions 123-127.司法意见123 - 127。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022 Dec;72(12). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005708.
3
Judicial Opinions 103-111.判决书 103-111.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022 Jan;72(1). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005197.
4
Solving the remaining problems with names of classes. Request for an Opinion.解决类名的剩余问题。征求意见。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022 Nov;72(11). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005605.
5
Judicial Opinion 128.司法意见 128.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023 Mar;73(3). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005797.
6
Is the bacterial genus name Zopf 1891 illegitimate? Request for an Opinion.扎夫(Zopf)氏菌属的学名 1891 年是否不合法?意见请求。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024 Jan;74(1). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006251.
7
Proposal to designate Methylothermus subterraneus Hirayama et al. 2011 as the type species of the genus Methylothermus. Request for an Opinion.关于指定2011年平山等人发现的地下甲基嗜热菌(Methylothermus subterraneus)为甲基嗜热菌属(Methylothermus)模式种的提案。意见征求。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Sep;67(9):3685. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002208. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
8
The status of the genus Seliberia Aristovskaya and Parinkina 1963 (Approved Lists 1980) and the species Seliberia stellate Aristovskaya and Parinkina 1963 (Approved Lists 1980). Request for an Opinion.1963年阿里斯托夫斯卡娅和帕林基娜的塞尔贝里亚属(1980年《核准名录》)及1963年阿里斯托夫斯卡娅和帕林基娜的星状塞尔贝里亚种(1980年《核准名录》)的状况。意见征求。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Jul;65(7):2337-2340. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000262. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
The status of the species Moorella thermoautotrophica Wiegel et al. 1981. Request for an Opinion.嗜热自养穆尔氏菌(Moorella thermoautotrophica)Wiegel等人,1981年。意见征求。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016 Aug;66(8):3249-3251. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001163. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
The status of the species Shewanella irciniae Lee et al. 2006. Request for an opinion.希瓦氏菌属(Shewanella)中伊尔钦希瓦氏菌(Shewanella irciniae)Lee等人,2006年。意见征求。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Aug;65(8):2774. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000427. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Judicial Opinion 132.司法意见132。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2025 Jul;75(7). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006819.
2
Judicial Opinion 131.司法意见131。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2025 Feb;75(2). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006692.
3
On validly published names, correct names, and changes in the nomenclature of phyla and genera of prokaryotes: a guide for the perplexed.关于原核生物门和属的有效发表名称、正确名称及命名法变更:给困惑者的指南
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024 Mar 11;10(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00494-9.
4
Description of a new freshwater bacterium Aquirufa regiilacus sp. nov., classification of the genera Aquirufa, Arundinibacter, Sandaracinomonas, and Tellurirhabdus to the family Spirosomataceae, classification of the genus Chryseotalea to the family Fulvivirgaceae and Litoribacter to the family Cyclobacteriaceae, as well as classification of Litoribacter alkaliphilus as a later heterotypic synonym of Litoribacter ruber.一种新的淡水细菌——雷氏水红菌(Aquirufa regiilacus sp. nov.)的描述、水红菌属(Aquirufa)、芦笛杆菌属(Arundinibacter)、沙黄单胞菌属(Sandaracinomonas)和碲红杆菌属(Tellurirhabdus)归属于螺旋体科(Spirosomataceae)、金黄菌属(Chryseotalea)归属于富黄弧菌科(Fulvivirgaceae)、滨岸杆菌属(Litoribacter)归属于环杆菌科(Cyclobacteriaceae),以及嗜碱滨岸杆菌(Litoribacter alkaliphilus)作为红滨岸杆菌(Litoribacter ruber)的晚出异名分类。
Arch Microbiol. 2024 Jan 27;206(2):79. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03801-8.