Department of Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH; Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Department of Rheumatology, Bronson Rheumatology Specialists, Kalamazoo, MI.
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101345. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101345. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is one of the most common leukemias experienced in adults and conveys significant morbidity and mortality. While the traditional anthracycline based treatments of AML involves cytarabine, developments in alternatives (liposomal cytarabine, fludarabine, cladribine, azacitidine, decitabine), and targeted agents (midostaurin, gilteritinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and venetoclax) exist. Multiple cardiovascular adverse events, notably pericardial toxicity, have been observed in small studies; however, to date little is known about the comparative pericardial toxicity among these newer regimens. Due to the paucity of data, we sought to investigate the reported pericardial events and mortality associated with treatments for AML. Utilizing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), we identified all adverse events associated with FDA approved treatments for AML (2002-2022). Pericardial events were defined as pericarditis, pericardial effusion and tamponade. We excluded any individuals with age <18 years old. Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with pericardial events. Out of 94,262 reported adverse events, 675 pericardial toxicities were included (243 pericarditis, 479 tamponade). Pericardial events occurred less often in Cladribine (0.3%, P < 0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P < 0.001), Venetoclax (0.3%, P < 0.001), enasidenib (0.3%, P value < 0.001), and ivosidenib (0.3%, P < 0.001) compared to Cytarabine (0.9%). Tamponade events occurred significantly less often in cladribine (0.1%, P < 0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P = 0.001), enasidenib (0.1%, P = 0.006), ivosidenib (0.1%, P = 0.01), and venetoclax (0.1%, P < 0.001) compared to cytarabine 0.7%. After adjusting for age and sex, Cladribine (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.18-0.68], P = 0.008) and Fludarabine (ROR 0.65 [0.45-0.92], P = 0.03), venetoclax (ROR 0.57 [0.41-0.79], P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with lower incidence of reported pericardial events. While cytarabine has been the routinely used and/or drug of choice for induction chemotherapy for AML, alternatives like cladribine may have a greater safety profile regarding pericardial toxicities. Future studies should be directed at further investigating cardiovascular safety profiles of AML induction therapy.
急性髓细胞白血病(AML)是成人中最常见的白血病之一,具有显著的发病率和死亡率。虽然 AML 的传统蒽环类药物治疗包括阿糖胞苷,但替代药物(脂质体阿糖胞苷、氟达拉滨、克拉屈滨、阿扎胞苷、地西他滨)和靶向药物(米哚妥林、吉特替尼、恩西地平、ivosidenib、吉妥珠单抗奥佐米星和维奈托克)已经存在。在小型研究中观察到多种心血管不良事件,尤其是心包毒性;然而,迄今为止,关于这些新方案中心包毒性的比较知之甚少。由于数据匮乏,我们试图研究 AML 治疗相关的报告心包事件和死亡率。利用食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS),我们确定了所有与 FDA 批准的 AML 治疗相关的不良事件(2002-2022 年)。心包事件定义为心包炎、心包积液和填塞。我们排除了任何年龄<18 岁的人。逻辑回归用于确定与心包事件相关的因素。在 94262 份报告的不良事件中,包括 675 例心包毒性(243 例心包炎,479 例填塞)。与阿糖胞苷相比, cladribine(0.3%,P<0.001)、氟达拉滨(0.4%,P<0.001)、venetoclax(0.3%,P<0.001)、enasidenib(0.3%,P 值<0.001)和 ivosidenib(0.3%,P<0.001)发生心包毒性的情况较少。与阿糖胞苷相比,cladribine(0.1%,P<0.001)、氟达拉滨(0.4%,P=0.001)、enasidenib(0.1%,P=0.006)、ivosidenib(0.1%,P=0.01)和 venetoclax(0.1%,P<0.001)发生填塞事件的情况明显较少。在调整年龄和性别后,cladribine(报告比值比 [ROR] 0.35 [95%CI 0.18-0.68],P=0.008)和氟达拉滨(ROR 0.65 [0.45-0.92],P=0.03)、venetoclax(ROR 0.57 [0.41-0.79],P<0.001)仍与报告的心包事件发生率较低显著相关。虽然阿糖胞苷一直是 AML 诱导化疗的常规使用药物和/或首选药物,但 cladribine 等替代药物在心包毒性方面可能具有更大的安全性。未来的研究应致力于进一步调查 AML 诱导治疗的心血管安全性概况。