Suppr超能文献

脊柱创伤手术时间:一项比较高收入国家与中低收入国家的世界文献荟萃分析。

Time to Surgery in Spinal Trauma: A Meta-Analysis of the World's Literature Comparing High-Income Countries to Low-Middle Income Countries.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e268-e282. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.140. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to: 1) compare time from traumatic spinal injury (TSI) to operating room (OR) in high-income countries (HICs) versus low-middle-income countries (LMICs), and 2) evaluate hospital length of stay (LOS) in HICs versus LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines involving articles of all languages.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

published between 1991 and 2021, spine trauma population, single country/region, and recorded time from injury to OR. The primary outcome was time from injury to OR, and the secondary outcome was LOS. Means and standard deviations were estimated in a random effects model by DerSimonian and Laird methods.

RESULTS

Of 2367 articles, 163 met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. Regarding time from injury to OR, 23 articles were eligible for meta-analysis; 16 studies were conducted in HICs and 7 in LMICs, comprising 3819 patients with TSI. A significantly shorter mean time from injury to OR was found in HICs (1.92 days, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.41) compared with LMICs (3.27 days, 95% confidence interval 2.27-4.27) (P = 0.020). Regarding length of stay, 14 articles were eligible for meta-analysis, 10 studies were conducted in HICs and 4 in LMICs, comprising 11,003 patients. There was no difference in LOS between HICs and LMICs (25.76 days vs. 20.48 days, P = 0.140).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with traumatic spinal injuries in HICs were more likely to undergo earlier surgery compared to patients in LMICs. No difference was found in total LOS between HICs and LMICs. While multiple factors can influence time to surgery, these findings draw attention to the global disparity in spinal trauma care.

摘要

目的

我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以:1)比较高收入国家(HIC)与中低收入国家(LMIC)创伤性脊柱损伤(TSI)至手术室(OR)的时间,2)评估 HIC 与 LMIC 的医院住院时间(LOS)。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,进行了系统的文献检索,涉及所有语言的文章。

纳入标准

发表于 1991 年至 2021 年,脊柱创伤人群,单一国家/地区,记录从损伤到 OR 的时间。主要结局是从损伤到 OR 的时间,次要结局是 LOS。采用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 方法的随机效应模型估计均值和标准差。

结果

在 2367 篇文章中,有 163 篇符合系统评价的纳入标准。关于从受伤到 OR 的时间,有 23 篇文章适合进行荟萃分析;16 项研究在 HIC 进行,7 项在 LMIC 进行,共纳入 3819 例 TSI 患者。与 LMIC(2.27-4.27)相比,HIC 中从受伤到 OR 的平均时间明显较短(1.92 天,95%置信区间 1.44-2.41)(P=0.020)。关于住院时间,有 14 篇文章适合进行荟萃分析,10 项研究在 HIC 进行,4 项在 LMIC 进行,共纳入 11003 例患者。HIC 和 LMIC 之间的 LOS 没有差异(25.76 天与 20.48 天,P=0.140)。

结论

与 LMIC 相比,HIC 创伤性脊柱损伤患者更有可能更早接受手术。HIC 和 LMIC 之间的总 LOS 没有差异。虽然有许多因素会影响手术时间,但这些发现引起了人们对全球脊柱创伤护理差距的关注。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验