Suppr超能文献

门诊环境对行单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的工人赔偿患者的影响及文献复习。

Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e251-e267. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.136. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in workers' compensation (WC) patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in either the inpatient/outpatient setting.

METHODS

Patients with WC undergoing 1-level MIS-TLIF were included. Patients were separated into inpatient/outpatient groups and demographically propensity score matched. PROMs included visual analog scale (VAS) back/VAS leg/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/12-item Short Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS)/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) preoperatively and 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Results were compared preoperatively and postoperatively and between cohorts. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was determined through comparison with values established in the literature.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients were included (184 inpatient). The inpatient cohort (IC) showed worse perioperative outcomes in multiple measures (P < 0.034; all). The IC improved in all PROMs (P < 0.038; all), besides ODI at 6 weeks, SF-12 PCS at 6 weeks/6 months/1 year, and PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks. The outpatient cohort (OC) improved in VAS back at all time points and VAS leg at 6 months (P < 0.033; all). Between cohorts, the OC showed better scores with VAS leg/ODI/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at multiple time points (P < 0.031; all). Most of the IC achieved MCID, aside from ODI, whereas the OC achieved MCID in SF-12 PCS. MCID achievement between cohorts was higher in the IC at PROMIS-PF at 1 year and VAS back overall (P < 0.034; all).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite more comorbidities and worse perioperative measures, the IC showed improved PROMs from preoperative to ≥1 follow-up visit, whereas the OC had improvement with only VAS back and leg. The IC showed multiple MCID achievements, whereas the OC showed MCID in only SF-12 PCS. These findings may help guide a surgeon's decision making between inpatient/outpatient lumbar surgery in the WC population.

摘要

目的

比较在住院/门诊环境下接受微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)的工人赔偿(WC)患者的围手术期特征和患者报告的结果测量(PROM)。

方法

纳入接受 1 节段 MIS-TLIF 的 WC 患者。患者分为住院/门诊组,并进行人口统计学倾向评分匹配。PROM 包括术前和术后 6 周、12 周、6 个月和 1 年的视觉模拟量表(VAS)背部/VAS 腿部/腰痛残疾指数(ODI)/12 项简明健康调查问卷物理成分评分(SF-12 PCS)/患者报告的结果测量信息系统物理功能(PROMIS-PF)。结果在术前和术后以及两组间进行比较。通过与文献中建立的数值进行比较来确定最小临床重要差异(MCID)的实现。

结果

共纳入 216 例患者(184 例住院)。住院组(IC)在多项测量中显示出较差的围手术期结果(P < 0.034;全部)。IC 在所有 PROM 中均有所改善(P < 0.038;全部),除了 6 周时的 ODI、6 周/6 个月/1 年时的 SF-12 PCS 和 6 周时的 PROMIS-PF。门诊组(OC)在所有时间点的 VAS 背部和 6 个月时的 VAS 腿部均有所改善(P < 0.033;全部)。在两组间,OC 在多个时间点的 VAS 腿部/ODI/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF 评分中表现出更好的结果(P < 0.031;全部)。IC 除了 ODI 之外,大多数达到了 MCID,而 OC 在 SF-12 PCS 中达到了 MCID。在 1 年时的 PROMIS-PF 和总体 VAS 背部的 MCID 实现中,IC 高于 OC(P < 0.034;全部)。

结论

尽管存在更多的合并症和较差的围手术期指标,IC 显示出从术前到≥1 次随访时 PROM 的改善,而 OC 仅在 VAS 背部和腿部出现改善。IC 显示出多个 MCID 的实现,而 OC 仅在 SF-12 PCS 中显示出 MCID。这些发现可能有助于指导外科医生在 WC 人群中进行住院/门诊腰椎手术的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验