Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e251-e267. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.136. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
To compare perioperative characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in workers' compensation (WC) patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in either the inpatient/outpatient setting.
Patients with WC undergoing 1-level MIS-TLIF were included. Patients were separated into inpatient/outpatient groups and demographically propensity score matched. PROMs included visual analog scale (VAS) back/VAS leg/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/12-item Short Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS)/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) preoperatively and 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Results were compared preoperatively and postoperatively and between cohorts. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was determined through comparison with values established in the literature.
A total of 216 patients were included (184 inpatient). The inpatient cohort (IC) showed worse perioperative outcomes in multiple measures (P < 0.034; all). The IC improved in all PROMs (P < 0.038; all), besides ODI at 6 weeks, SF-12 PCS at 6 weeks/6 months/1 year, and PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks. The outpatient cohort (OC) improved in VAS back at all time points and VAS leg at 6 months (P < 0.033; all). Between cohorts, the OC showed better scores with VAS leg/ODI/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at multiple time points (P < 0.031; all). Most of the IC achieved MCID, aside from ODI, whereas the OC achieved MCID in SF-12 PCS. MCID achievement between cohorts was higher in the IC at PROMIS-PF at 1 year and VAS back overall (P < 0.034; all).
Despite more comorbidities and worse perioperative measures, the IC showed improved PROMs from preoperative to ≥1 follow-up visit, whereas the OC had improvement with only VAS back and leg. The IC showed multiple MCID achievements, whereas the OC showed MCID in only SF-12 PCS. These findings may help guide a surgeon's decision making between inpatient/outpatient lumbar surgery in the WC population.
比较在住院/门诊环境下接受微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)的工人赔偿(WC)患者的围手术期特征和患者报告的结果测量(PROM)。
纳入接受 1 节段 MIS-TLIF 的 WC 患者。患者分为住院/门诊组,并进行人口统计学倾向评分匹配。PROM 包括术前和术后 6 周、12 周、6 个月和 1 年的视觉模拟量表(VAS)背部/VAS 腿部/腰痛残疾指数(ODI)/12 项简明健康调查问卷物理成分评分(SF-12 PCS)/患者报告的结果测量信息系统物理功能(PROMIS-PF)。结果在术前和术后以及两组间进行比较。通过与文献中建立的数值进行比较来确定最小临床重要差异(MCID)的实现。
共纳入 216 例患者(184 例住院)。住院组(IC)在多项测量中显示出较差的围手术期结果(P < 0.034;全部)。IC 在所有 PROM 中均有所改善(P < 0.038;全部),除了 6 周时的 ODI、6 周/6 个月/1 年时的 SF-12 PCS 和 6 周时的 PROMIS-PF。门诊组(OC)在所有时间点的 VAS 背部和 6 个月时的 VAS 腿部均有所改善(P < 0.033;全部)。在两组间,OC 在多个时间点的 VAS 腿部/ODI/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF 评分中表现出更好的结果(P < 0.031;全部)。IC 除了 ODI 之外,大多数达到了 MCID,而 OC 在 SF-12 PCS 中达到了 MCID。在 1 年时的 PROMIS-PF 和总体 VAS 背部的 MCID 实现中,IC 高于 OC(P < 0.034;全部)。
尽管存在更多的合并症和较差的围手术期指标,IC 显示出从术前到≥1 次随访时 PROM 的改善,而 OC 仅在 VAS 背部和腿部出现改善。IC 显示出多个 MCID 的实现,而 OC 仅在 SF-12 PCS 中显示出 MCID。这些发现可能有助于指导外科医生在 WC 人群中进行住院/门诊腰椎手术的决策。