• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

取消《平价医疗法案》个人强制参保罚款对保险覆盖范围和市场参保的影响:来自马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的州强制参保的证据。

Effects of Repealing the ACA Individual Mandate Penalty on Insurance Coverage and Marketplace Enrollment: Evidence From State Mandates in Massachusetts and New Jersey.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

Division of Health Systems Management and Policy, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.

出版信息

Med Care. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):759-767. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001760. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001760
PMID:35948353
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Congress eliminated the individual mandate penalty of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) effective January 1, 2019.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of repealing the ACA mandate penalty on private health insurance coverage and marketplace enrollment by leveraging state-based mandates in Massachusetts and New Jersey.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We employ synthetic control and difference-in-differences methods to compare insurance and enrollment changes separately in Massachusetts and New Jersey, which had insurance mandates effective in 2019, to other states without such mandates.

SUBJECTS

Adults aged 18-64 years with income of 150-300% and above 300% of the Federal Poverty Level who participated in the 2016-2019 American Community Survey (ACS) and adults aged 18-64 enrolled in insurance marketplaces based on state-level data from the 2016-2021 Marketplace Open Enrollment Period Public Use Files (MOEP-PUF).

MEASURES

Any insurance, individually purchased coverage, and employer-sponsored coverage from the ACS and marketplace enrollment from the MOEP-PUF.

RESULTS

Changes in any coverage, individually purchased coverage, and employer-sponsored coverage rates are relatively small (generally in the range of 1-2 percentage points) and statistically nonsignificant in both Massachusetts and New Jersey compared with states without mandates. Furthermore, there is no discernable difference by eligibility for marketplace subsidies based on income level in the ACS data. Similarly, estimates for changes in marketplace enrollment are also small overall and statistically nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

Private insurance coverage rates and marketplace enrollment for adults 18-64 do not appear to have changed thus far owing to the 2019 repeal of the ACA individual mandate penalty.

摘要

背景

国会于 2019 年 1 月 1 日取消了《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的个人授权罚款。

目的

利用马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的基于州的授权,研究取消 ACA 授权罚款对私人医疗保险覆盖范围和市场参保的影响。

研究设计

我们采用合成控制和差分法,分别比较了 2019 年生效的马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的保险和参保变化,以及其他没有此类授权的州。

研究对象

18-64 岁,收入在联邦贫困线的 150%-300%和 300%以上的成年人,他们参加了 2016-2019 年的美国社区调查(ACS),以及根据州一级数据,18-64 岁的成年人在保险市场参保,数据来自 2016-2021 年市场开放注册期公共使用文件(MOEP-PUF)。

研究措施

ACS 中的任何保险、个人购买保险和雇主提供的保险,以及 MOEP-PUF 中的市场参保情况。

结果

与没有授权的州相比,马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的任何保险、个人购买保险和雇主提供的保险的覆盖率变化相对较小(通常在 1-2 个百分点范围内),且统计上不显著。此外,ACS 数据中,根据收入水平,市场补贴资格的变化没有明显差异。同样,市场参保变化的估计值总体上也较小,且统计上不显著。

结论

由于 2019 年取消了 ACA 的个人授权罚款,18-64 岁成年人的私人保险覆盖率和市场参保率似乎没有变化。

相似文献

1
Effects of Repealing the ACA Individual Mandate Penalty on Insurance Coverage and Marketplace Enrollment: Evidence From State Mandates in Massachusetts and New Jersey.取消《平价医疗法案》个人强制参保罚款对保险覆盖范围和市场参保的影响:来自马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的州强制参保的证据。
Med Care. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):759-767. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001760. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
Assessment of Churn in Coverage Among California's Health Insurance Marketplace Enrollees.评估加州医疗保险市场参保者的保险覆盖流失情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Dec 2;3(12):e224484. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4484.
3
Comparison of Income Eligibility for Medicaid vs Marketplace Coverage for Insurance Enrollment Among Low-Income US Adults.比较美国低收入成年人通过医疗补助和市场交易获得医疗保险的收入资格。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 14;2(6):e210771. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0771. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Following the ACA Repeal-and-Replace Effort, Where Does the U.S. Stand on Insurance Coverage? Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey, March--June 2017.在《平价医疗法案》废除与替代努力之后,美国在医保覆盖方面处于何种状况?来自英联邦基金会《平价医疗法案》追踪调查的结果,2017年3月至6月
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Sep;2017:1-21.
5
The Role of Marketplace Policy on Welcome Mat Effects for Children Eligible for Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program.市场政策对有资格参加医疗补助或儿童健康保险计划的儿童欢迎垫效应的作用。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020952920. doi: 10.1177/0046958020952920.
6
The Affordable Care Act's Marketplaces Expanded Insurance Coverage For Adults With Chronic Health Conditions.平价医疗法案的市场为患有慢性疾病的成年人扩大了保险覆盖范围。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Apr;37(4):600-606. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1505.
7
Growth In ACA-Compliant Marketplace Enrollment And Spending Risk Changes During The COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,符合 ACA 的市场参保人数和支出风险的变化。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Nov;40(11):1722-1730. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00501.
8
Changes in Insurance Coverage Continuity After Affordable Care Act Expansion of Medicaid Eligibility for Young Adults With Low Income in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州平价医疗法案扩大低收入青年医疗补助资格后,保险覆盖连续性的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jul 15;3(7):e221996. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1996. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
The Affordable Care Act's Coverage Impacts in the Trump Era.平价医疗法案在特朗普时代的影响。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211042973. doi: 10.1177/00469580211042973.
10
States' racial resentment correlates with administrative distancing and lower rates of health plan selection in affordable care act marketplaces: a cross sectional analysis.各州的种族怨恨与行政隔离以及平价医疗法案市场中健康计划选择率降低相关:一项横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 1;23(1):1191. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10252-w.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Individual Mandate and Income on Private Health Insurance Enrollment: A State-Level Analysis on Individual Behavior Change.个人强制医保与收入对私人医疗保险参保率的影响:基于个人行为变化的州层面分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Apr 8;18:1229-1239. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S501240. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of Eased Restrictions for Aca-Exempt Short-Term Health Plans on Marketplace Premiums and Uninsured Rate: A Difference in Differences Analysis.放宽 ACA 豁免短期健康计划限制对市场保费和 uninsured rate 的影响:差分分析。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231179892. doi: 10.1177/00469580231179892.