Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Division of Health Systems Management and Policy, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
Med Care. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):759-767. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001760. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Congress eliminated the individual mandate penalty of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) effective January 1, 2019.
To examine the effects of repealing the ACA mandate penalty on private health insurance coverage and marketplace enrollment by leveraging state-based mandates in Massachusetts and New Jersey.
We employ synthetic control and difference-in-differences methods to compare insurance and enrollment changes separately in Massachusetts and New Jersey, which had insurance mandates effective in 2019, to other states without such mandates.
Adults aged 18-64 years with income of 150-300% and above 300% of the Federal Poverty Level who participated in the 2016-2019 American Community Survey (ACS) and adults aged 18-64 enrolled in insurance marketplaces based on state-level data from the 2016-2021 Marketplace Open Enrollment Period Public Use Files (MOEP-PUF).
Any insurance, individually purchased coverage, and employer-sponsored coverage from the ACS and marketplace enrollment from the MOEP-PUF.
Changes in any coverage, individually purchased coverage, and employer-sponsored coverage rates are relatively small (generally in the range of 1-2 percentage points) and statistically nonsignificant in both Massachusetts and New Jersey compared with states without mandates. Furthermore, there is no discernable difference by eligibility for marketplace subsidies based on income level in the ACS data. Similarly, estimates for changes in marketplace enrollment are also small overall and statistically nonsignificant.
Private insurance coverage rates and marketplace enrollment for adults 18-64 do not appear to have changed thus far owing to the 2019 repeal of the ACA individual mandate penalty.
国会于 2019 年 1 月 1 日取消了《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的个人授权罚款。
利用马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的基于州的授权,研究取消 ACA 授权罚款对私人医疗保险覆盖范围和市场参保的影响。
我们采用合成控制和差分法,分别比较了 2019 年生效的马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的保险和参保变化,以及其他没有此类授权的州。
18-64 岁,收入在联邦贫困线的 150%-300%和 300%以上的成年人,他们参加了 2016-2019 年的美国社区调查(ACS),以及根据州一级数据,18-64 岁的成年人在保险市场参保,数据来自 2016-2021 年市场开放注册期公共使用文件(MOEP-PUF)。
ACS 中的任何保险、个人购买保险和雇主提供的保险,以及 MOEP-PUF 中的市场参保情况。
与没有授权的州相比,马萨诸塞州和新泽西州的任何保险、个人购买保险和雇主提供的保险的覆盖率变化相对较小(通常在 1-2 个百分点范围内),且统计上不显著。此外,ACS 数据中,根据收入水平,市场补贴资格的变化没有明显差异。同样,市场参保变化的估计值总体上也较小,且统计上不显著。
由于 2019 年取消了 ACA 的个人授权罚款,18-64 岁成年人的私人保险覆盖率和市场参保率似乎没有变化。