• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的体能状态与生存情况:回顾性研究

Performance status and survival in cancer patients undergoing palliative care: retrospective study.

作者信息

Allende-Pérez Silvia, Rodríguez-Mayoral Oscar, Peña-Nieves Adriana, Bruera Eduardo

机构信息

Palliative Care, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.

Palliative Care, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Aug 10. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003562.

DOI:10.1136/spcare-2022-003562
PMID:35948390
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Accurate forecasting the life expectancy of patients with cancer is adamantly needed for adequate decision-making in the Palliative Care Services (PCS) context. Nonetheless, physician forecast is often inaccurate, hindering end of life (EOL) decisions. In this study, we determined the prognostic value of two oncology performance status (PS) scales at first referral to PCS.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 6310 patients consecutively admitted to PCS at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (2012-2018). Demographic and PS (as per Karnofsky (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scales) information was retrieved and the overall survival of patients calculated according to PS. Concordance of each scale was assessed in the overall population and according to age.

RESULTS

Overall survival was significantly associated with ECOG and KPS (p<0.05). A total of 2278 (36.1%) and 2296 (36.4%) patients were referred to PCS in their last month of life and most had a poor PS (ECOG 3-4, 59.1%; KPS <50, 54.4%). Both PS scales had high concordance in the overall population (K=0.6189 (KPS); K=0.6058 (ECOG)), but a higher value was observed among the subgroup of patients aged ≥65 (K=0.6339 (KPS); 0.6252 (ECOG)). Concordance was lowest among younger (≤39) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PS as assessed by the most widely known tools is strongly associated with overall survival of patients with cancer attending PCS. No large differences were observed among the scales, though results slightly favour the use of KPS. Early referral to PCS and accurate survival prediction can aid in relevant decision-making for patients approaching EOL.

摘要

目的

在姑息治疗服务(PCS)背景下,为了做出充分的决策,迫切需要准确预测癌症患者的预期寿命。然而,医生的预测往往不准确,这阻碍了临终(EOL)决策。在本研究中,我们确定了首次转诊至PCS时两种肿瘤学表现状态(PS)量表的预后价值。

方法

对国立癌症研究所(2012 - 2018年)连续收治入PCS的6310例患者进行回顾性分析。收集人口统计学和PS(根据卡诺夫斯基(KPS)和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)量表)信息,并根据PS计算患者的总生存期。在总体人群中以及根据年龄评估每种量表的一致性。

结果

总生存期与ECOG和KPS显著相关(p<0.05)。共有2278例(36.1%)和2296例(36.4%)患者在生命的最后一个月被转诊至PCS,且大多数患者的PS较差(ECOG 3 - 4,59.1%;KPS<50,54.4%)。两种PS量表在总体人群中具有较高的一致性(K = 0.6189(KPS);K = 0.6058(ECOG)),但在年龄≥65岁的患者亚组中观察到更高的值(K = 0.6339(KPS);0.6252(ECOG))。在较年轻(≤39岁)患者中一致性最低。

结论

通过最广为人知的工具评估的PS与接受PCS的癌症患者的总生存期密切相关。各量表之间未观察到较大差异,不过结果略微倾向于使用KPS。早期转诊至PCS和准确的生存预测有助于为接近EOL的患者做出相关决策。

相似文献

1
Performance status and survival in cancer patients undergoing palliative care: retrospective study.接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的体能状态与生存情况:回顾性研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Aug 10. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003562.
2
Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status.基于体能状态的晚期癌症患者简易预后模型
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):e335-41. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001457. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
3
Interconversion of two commonly used performance tools: An analysis of 5844 paired assessments in 1501 lung cancer patients.两种常用性能工具的相互转换:对1501例肺癌患者的5844对评估的分析
World J Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov 10;9(7):140-147. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v9.i7.140.
4
Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution.卡诺夫斯基和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分在肺癌中的应用:一项对来自单一机构的536例患者的前瞻性纵向研究。
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Jun;32A(7):1135-41. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00664-8.
5
Conversion of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) to Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the interchangeability of PPS and KPS in prognostic tools.将卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)和东部肿瘤协作组功能状态评分(ECOG)转换为姑息治疗功能状态量表(PPS),以及PPS与KPS在预后工具中的互换性。
J Palliat Care. 2013 Autumn;29(3):163-9.
6
The Functionality Assessment Flowchart (FAF): a new simple and reliable method to measure performance status with a high percentage of agreement between observers.功能评估流程图(FAF):一种新的简单可靠的方法,用于测量功能状态,观察者之间的一致性百分比很高。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Jul 5;15:501. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1526-0.
7
Nurse and physician inter-rater agreement of three performance status measures in palliative care outpatients.护士和医生在姑息治疗门诊患者中对三种功能状态测量工具的评定者间一致性。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 May;18(5):609-16. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0700-9. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
8
Palliative care in poor-performance status small cell lung cancer patients: is there a mandatory role for chemotherapy?晚期低体能状态小细胞肺癌患者的姑息治疗:化疗是否有强制性作用?
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Nov;20(11):2721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1392-0. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
9
Comparing Physician and Nurse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) Ratings as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer.比较医师和护士的东部肿瘤协作组表现状态(ECOG-PS)评分,以预测癌症患者的临床结局。
Oncologist. 2019 Dec;24(12):e1460-e1466. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0882. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Palliative Performance Scale: cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation for Polish hospice setting.缓和医疗表现量表:波兰临终关怀环境下的跨文化适应和心理测量学验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 22;19(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00563-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported pain severity is associated with shorter survival in older adults with newly diagnosed cancer.患者报告的疼痛严重程度与新诊断癌症的老年人较短的生存期相关。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 26;33(8):722. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09779-x.
2
Simultaneous concurrent chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for synchronous head and neck and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective review.同步放化疗与食管切除术治疗同步性头颈部和食管鳞状细胞癌:一项回顾性研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 9;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02681-0.
3
Symptom Burden Poorly Responsive to Palliative Care Intervention and Karnofsky Predict Survival in an Acute Palliative Care Unit.
症状负担对姑息治疗干预反应不佳,卡诺夫斯基评分可预测急性姑息治疗病房的生存率。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 19;17(10):1704. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101704.
4
A Multi-Institutional Natural Language Processing Pipeline to Extract Performance Status From Electronic Health Records.多机构自然语言处理管道从电子健康记录中提取表现状态。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241279518. doi: 10.1177/10732748241279518.
5
Deep Learning Prediction Model for Patient Survival Outcomes in Palliative Care Using Actigraphy Data and Clinical Information.使用活动记录仪数据和临床信息的姑息治疗患者生存结局深度学习预测模型
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 10;15(8):2232. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082232.
6
Exploring the Potential Use of Wearable Devices as a Prognostic Tool among Patients in Hospice Care.探讨可穿戴设备在临终关怀患者预后评估中的潜在应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 12;58(12):1824. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121824.