Department of Clinical Research Management, Center of Biostatistics, Design, Measurement and Evaluation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 10;12(1):13620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18033-x.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is fast becoming one of the most expensive, deadly and burdensome diseases in this century. It has the fastest-growing disease burden in China. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphic alleles are generally considered to be the primary genetic determinant of AD risk: individuals with the E4 allele are at increased risk of AD compared with individuals with the more common E3 allele. Since the intensity of the association varies among different ethnic groups, a separate meta-analysis of the Chinese population is needed. We searched Chinese and English databases to sift through literature over the past 20 years. Data on the APOE genotype and AD were collected for correlation analysis. OR was calculated according to APOE allele and genotype. A publication bias analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the main results were further verified by subgroup analysis. The 116 eligible studies enrolled 23,396 patients with AD and 25,568 healthy controls. The study subjects covered at least 30 of the 34 provincial-level administrative regions (including Taiwan). The partial sex ratio was as follows: AD male/female; 10,291/11,240; control male/female, 11,304/12,428, [Formula: see text] = 0.122, P = 0.727. The results of the meta-analysis of alleles showed that I > 50% and Q statistics were significant for all genotypes; therefore, the random effect model was selected. The frequency of the ApoE ε4 allele in AD was higher than that in healthy controls, and the difference was statistically significant (OR 2.847, 95% CI [2.611-3.101], P < 0.001). The frequencies of ApoE ε3 and ε2 in AD were lower than those in healthy controls, and the differences were statistically significant (ε3: OR 0.539, 95% CI [0.504-0.576], P < 0.001; ε2: OR 0.771, 95% CI [0.705-0.843], P < 0.001). The results of the meta-analysis of AD genotype showed that ApoE ε2/ε4 (OR 1.521, 95% CI [1.270-1.823], P < 0.001), ε3/ε4 (OR 2.491, 95% CI [2.267-2.738], P < 0.001) and ε4/ε4 (OR 5.481, 95% CI [4.801-6.257], P < 0.001) allele genotype frequencies were higher than those of the healthy controls. The differences were all statistically significant. Moreover, the ApoE ε2/ε2 (OR 0.612, 95% CI [0.504-0.743], P < 0.001), ε2/ε3 (OR 0.649, 95% CI [0.585-0.714], P < 0.001) and ε3/ε3 (OR 0.508, 95% CI [0.468-0.551], P < 0.001) genotypes were less frequent in patients with AD than in healthy controls, and the differences were statistically significant. The results of the sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were consistent with those of the whole model. These results provide support for the protective effect of the ApoE ε3/ε3 genotype against the development of AD. This research is the most comprehensive meta-analysis of the correlation between APOE and AD in the Chinese population by analysing the distribution of the APOE gene in patients with AD reported in the last 20 years. It was concluded that the APOE ε3 allele had a protective effect against sporadic AD in the Chinese population, with great significance, and that its protective effect was stronger than that of the ε2 allele.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)正迅速成为本世纪最昂贵、最致命和最具负担性的疾病之一。它是中国疾病负担增长最快的疾病。载脂蛋白 E(APOE)多态等位基因通常被认为是 AD 风险的主要遗传决定因素:与更常见的 E3 等位基因相比,携带 E4 等位基因的个体患 AD 的风险增加。由于关联的强度在不同的种族群体中有所不同,因此需要对中国人群进行单独的荟萃分析。我们检索了中文和英文数据库,以筛选过去 20 年的文献。收集了关于 APOE 基因型和 AD 的数据进行相关分析。根据 APOE 等位基因和基因型计算比值比(OR)。进行了发表偏倚分析和敏感性分析,并通过亚组分析进一步验证了主要结果。116 项合格研究纳入了 23396 例 AD 患者和 25568 例健康对照。研究对象涵盖了至少 34 个省级行政区中的 30 个(包括台湾)。部分性别比如下:AD 男性/女性为 10291/11240;对照男性/女性为 11304/12428,[公式:见正文] = 0.122,P = 0.727。等位基因荟萃分析结果显示,所有基因型的 I > 50%和 Q 统计均显著,因此选择了随机效应模型。AD 中 ApoE ε4 等位基因的频率高于健康对照组,差异具有统计学意义(OR 2.847,95% CI [2.611-3.101],P < 0.001)。AD 中 ApoE ε3 和 ε2 的频率低于健康对照组,差异具有统计学意义(ε3:OR 0.539,95% CI [0.504-0.576],P < 0.001;ε2:OR 0.771,95% CI [0.705-0.843],P < 0.001)。AD 基因型荟萃分析结果显示,ApoE ε2/ε4(OR 1.521,95% CI [1.270-1.823],P < 0.001)、ε3/ε4(OR 2.491,95% CI [2.267-2.738],P < 0.001)和 ε4/ε4(OR 5.481,95% CI [4.801-6.257],P < 0.001)等位基因基因型频率均高于健康对照组,差异均具有统计学意义。此外,ApoE ε2/ε2(OR 0.612,95% CI [0.504-0.743],P < 0.001)、ε2/ε3(OR 0.649,95% CI [0.585-0.714],P < 0.001)和 ε3/ε3(OR 0.508,95% CI [0.468-0.551],P < 0.001)基因型在 AD 患者中的频率均低于健康对照组,差异均具有统计学意义。敏感性分析和亚组分析的结果与全模型的结果一致。这些结果为 ApoE ε3/ε3 基因型对 AD 发展的保护作用提供了支持。本研究通过分析过去 20 年报道的 AD 患者中 APOE 基因的分布,对中国人群 APOE 与 AD 的相关性进行了最全面的荟萃分析。研究结论为 ApoE ε3 等位基因对中国人群散发性 AD 具有保护作用,意义重大,其保护作用强于 ε2 等位基因。