• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国农业灰水足迹的时空变化及驱动因素分解。

Spatial-temporal variation and driving factors decomposition of agricultural grey water footprint in China.

机构信息

Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.

College of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 15;318:115601. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115601. Epub 2022 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115601
PMID:35949098
Abstract

The management of agricultural water pollution is crucial to alleviate the water crisis and promote regional sustainable development. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the spatial-temporal variation characteristics of the agricultural grey water footprint (GWF) and accurately identify its main influencing factors, aiming at formulating differentiated regional management strategies. Based on this, the agricultural GWFs of 31 provincial regions in China from 2011 to 2019 were firstly calculated, and then the spatial-temporal variation characteristics of agricultural GWF were analyzed using the ArcGIS software and Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) method. Finally, the Generalized Divisia Index Method (GDIM) was creatively introduced to decompose the factors of agricultural GWF change and their respective contributions at the national and provincial levels. The main results are as follow: (1) Agricultural GWF in China decreased on the whole and showed significant provincial differences. Among them, the agricultural GWF of Henan Province was the largest while that of Shanghai City was the smallest. Compared with 2011, most provinces saw a decrease in agricultural GWF in 2019 while Yunnan, Tibet, Qinghai, Ningxia and Xinjiang Provinces achieved growth. (2) Areas with higher agricultural GDP generally had higher agricultural GWF. The spatial distribution of agricultural GWF and breeding GWF generally tended to be consistent, with the lower value in northwest and southeast of China and higher value in the northeast and southwest of China. Meanwhile, the mean center of SDE of agricultural GWF was located in Henan Province from 2011 to 2018, and shifted to Shaanxi Province in 2019, showing a slight northwest shift. (3) Agricultural GWF intensity and agricultural GDP had the largest restraining effect and driving effect on agricultural GWF growth, respectively. Additionally, China has achieved decoupling between agricultural GWF and agricultural GDP, reflecting that the patterns of agricultural production and consumption have become more sustainable. The findings of this study can provide important decision-making insights for agricultural water pollution management and industry adjustment.

摘要

农业水污染管理对于缓解水危机和促进区域可持续发展至关重要。因此,有必要阐明农业灰色水足迹(GWF)的时空变化特征,并准确识别其主要影响因素,旨在制定有区别的区域管理策略。基于此,本文首先计算了 2011 年至 2019 年中国 31 个省级行政区的农业 GWF,然后利用 ArcGIS 软件和标准离差椭圆(SDE)方法分析了农业 GWF 的时空变化特征。最后,创造性地引入广义Divisia 指数法(GDIM)来分解全国和省级农业 GWF 变化的因素及其各自的贡献。主要结果如下:(1)中国农业 GWF 整体呈下降趋势,且具有显著的省级差异。其中,河南省农业 GWF 最大,上海市农业 GWF 最小。与 2011 年相比,2019 年大多数省份的农业 GWF 呈下降趋势,而云南、西藏、青海、宁夏和新疆则有所增长。(2)农业 GDP 较高的地区一般农业 GWF 也较高。农业 GWF 和养殖 GWF 的空间分布总体上趋于一致,中国西北部和东南部的数值较低,东北部和西南部的数值较高。同时,2011 年至 2018 年农业 GWF 的 SDE 均值中心位于河南省,2019 年转移到陕西省,呈略微向西北方向移动。(3)农业 GWF 强度和农业 GDP 对农业 GWF 增长的抑制作用和驱动作用最大。此外,中国农业 GWF 与农业 GDP 已实现脱钩,这反映出农业生产和消费模式变得更加可持续。本研究的结果可为农业水污染管理和产业调整提供重要的决策见解。

相似文献

1
Spatial-temporal variation and driving factors decomposition of agricultural grey water footprint in China.中国农业灰水足迹的时空变化及驱动因素分解。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 15;318:115601. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115601. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
2
Evaluating the anthropogenic nitrogen emissions to water using a hybrid approach in a city cluster: Insights into historical evolution, attribution, and mitigation potential.运用混合方法评估城市群人为氮排放对水体的影响:历史演变、归因和减排潜力的深入分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 10;855:158500. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158500. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
Green water appropriation of the cropland ecosystem in China.中国农田生态系统的绿水占用情况
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 2):150597. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150597. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Mapping multiple water pollutants across China using the grey water footprint.利用灰水足迹对中国的多种水污染物进行测绘。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 1;785:147255. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147255. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
5
China's provincial grey water footprint characteristic and driving forces.中国省级灰水足迹特征及驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 10;677:427-435. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.318. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
6
A modified approach of the agricultural grey water footprint considering the nitrogen fixation effect of crops in China.考虑到中国农作物固氮效应的农业灰色水足迹修正方法。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Sep 15;357:124457. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124457. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Variation and internal-external driving forces of grey water footprint efficiency in China's Yellow River Basin.中国黄河流域灰水足迹效率的变化及内外驱动力。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0283199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283199. eCollection 2023.
8
Grey water footprint evaluation and driving force analysis of eight economic regions in China.中国八个经济区域的灰水足迹评价及驱动力分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):20380-20391. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08450-8. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of grey water footprint efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.长江经济带灰水足迹效率的时空演变及驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 20;844:156930. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156930. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
10
Ecological risk evaluation of ammonia nitrogen pollution in China based on the ecological grey water footprint model.基于生态灰色水足迹模型的中国氨氮污染生态风险评价
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119087. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119087. Epub 2023 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The road to carbon neutrality in China's building sector.中国建筑行业的碳中和之路。
iScience. 2024 Aug 3;27(9):110664. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110664. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.
2
Monitoring grey water footprint and associated environmental controls in agricultural watershed.监测农业流域中的灰水足迹及其相关环境控制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11334-11348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31961-7. Epub 2024 Jan 13.