Suppr超能文献

在一家国家级转诊中心进行的睾丸癌机器人腹膜后淋巴结清扫术

Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer at a national referral centre.

作者信息

Grenabo Bergdahl Anna, Månsson Marianne, Holmberg Göran, Fovaeus Magnus

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Göteborg Göteborg Sweden.

Department of Urology Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2022 Mar 31;3(5):363-370. doi: 10.1002/bco2.149. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aim to determine if robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) can be performed as a safe option to open RPLND in selected patients with metastatic germ cell cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This population-based prospective study was performed at a one of two national referral centres for RPLND in Sweden. All patients referred during January 2017-March 2021 were screened for possible inclusion. R-RPLND was performed using the Da Vinci Xi surgical system. Perioperative parameters, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo), final pathology, preservation of antegrade ejaculation and relapse rates were evaluated. Classifiers for selecting patients to open versus robotic RPLND were analysed by logistic regression modelling. The median follow-up was 23 months.

RESULTS

Of 87 patients referred, 29 were selected for R-RPLND, 19 in a post-chemotherapy setting. In median, retroperitoneal tumour diameter was 18 mm, BMI 24 kg/m, operative time 433 min, estimated blood loss 50 ml and length of stay 3 days. One patient underwent open conversion due to failure to progress. Four patients had Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications, of which three were chylous-related. No in-field recurrences occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study suggests that R-RPLND can be safely performed in at least one third of patients referred for an RPLND. A relatively high rate of lymph-leakage may represent a potential drawback. Tumour size may be the most important discriminator when deciding on robotic versus open RPLND. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to validate the results.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定机器人辅助腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(R-RPLND)能否作为一种安全的选择,应用于部分转移性生殖细胞癌患者,以替代开放性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RPLND)。

患者与方法

这项基于人群的前瞻性研究在瑞典两家全国性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术转诊中心之一进行。对2017年1月至2021年3月期间转诊的所有患者进行筛选,以确定是否可能纳入研究。使用达芬奇Xi手术系统进行R-RPLND。评估围手术期参数、术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级)、最终病理结果、顺行射精功能的保留情况及复发率。通过逻辑回归模型分析选择开放性与机器人辅助RPLND患者的分类因素。中位随访时间为23个月。

结果

在87例转诊患者中,29例被选行R-RPLND,其中19例为化疗后患者。腹膜后肿瘤直径中位数为18mm,体重指数(BMI)为24kg/m²,手术时间433分钟,估计失血量50ml,住院时间3天。1例患者因手术进展不顺转为开放手术。4例患者出现Clavien-Dindo 3级并发症,其中3例与乳糜有关。随访期间未发生术野复发。

结论

这项基于人群的研究表明,至少三分之一转诊行腹膜后淋巴结清扫术的患者可安全地接受机器人辅助腹膜后淋巴结清扫术。相对较高的淋巴漏发生率可能是一个潜在的缺点。在决定采用机器人辅助还是开放性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术时,肿瘤大小可能是最重要的鉴别因素。需要进行更长时间随访的进一步研究来验证这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8a5/9349583/6dad37f56c7e/BCO2-3-363-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验