Suppr超能文献

第三代双源 CT 采用不同采集技术、最新内核和高级单能量后处理技术对支架进行可视化的效果。

Effect of acquisition techniques, latest kernels, and advanced monoenergetic post-processing for stent visualization with third-generation dual-source CT.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Jul;28(4):364-369. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.21107.

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the effect of tube voltage, current kernels, and monoenergetic post-processing on stent visualization. METHODS A 6 mm chrome-cobalt peripheral stent was placed in a dedicated phantom and scanned with the available tube voltage settings of a third-generation dual-source scanner in single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) mode. Images were reconstructed using the latest convolution kernels and monoenergetic reconstructions (40-190 keV) for DE. The sharpness of stent struts (S), struts width (SW), contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR), and pseudoenhancement (PE) between the vessel with and without stent were analyzed using an in-house built automatic analysis tool. Measurements were standardized through calculated z-scores. Z-scores were combined for stent (SQ), luminal (LQ), and overall depiction quality (OQ) by adding S and SW, CNR and SW and PE, and S and SW and CNR and PE. Two readers rated overall stent depiction on a 5-point Likert-scale. Agreement was calculated using linear-weighted kappa. Correlations were calculated using Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS Maximum values of S and CNR were 169.1 HU/pixel for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 40 keV] and 50.0 for [SE; 70 kV; Bv36]. Minimum values of SW and PE were 2.615 mm for [DE; 80 to 90/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 140 to 190 keV] and 0.12 HU for [DE; 80/ Sn 150 kV; Qr36; 190 keV]. Best combined z-scores of SQ, LQ, and OQ were 4.53 for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr 59; 40 keV], 1.23 for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 140 keV] and 2.95 for [DE; 90/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 50 keV]. Best OQ of SE was ranked third with 2.89 for [SE; 90 kV; Bv59]. Subjective agreement was excellent (kappa=0.86; P < .001) and correlated well with OQ (rs=0.94, P < .001). CONCLUSION Combining DE computed tomography (CT) acquisition with the latest kernels and monoenergetic post-processing allows for improved stent visualization as compared with SECT. The best overall results were obtained for monoenergetic reconstructions with 50 keV from DECT 90/Sn 150 kV acquisitions using kernel Qr59.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在系统评估管电压、电流核、单能量后处理对支架可视化的影响。

方法 使用第三代双源扫描仪的可用管电压设置,在专用体模中放置一个 6 毫米的铬钴外周支架,进行单能量(SE)和双能量(DE)模式扫描。使用最新的卷积核和单能量重建(40-190keV)对 DE 进行图像重建。使用内部构建的自动分析工具分析支架支柱的清晰度(S)、支柱宽度(SW)、对比噪声比(CNR)和有支架与无支架血管之间的伪增强(PE)。通过计算 z 分数对测量值进行标准化。通过将 S 和 SW、CNR 和 SW 以及 PE 和 S 和 SW、CNR 和 PE 相加,将 z 分数组合成支架(SQ)、管腔(LQ)和整体描绘质量(OQ)。两位读者使用 5 分李克特量表对整体支架描绘进行评分。使用线性加权 kappa 计算一致性。使用 Spearman 相关系数计算相关性。

结果 S 和 CNR 的最大值分别为[DE;100/Sn150kV;Qr59;40keV]的 169.1HU/pixel 和[SE;70kV;Bv36]的 50.0。SW 和 PE 的最小值分别为[DE;80 至 90/Sn150kV;Qr59;140 至 190keV]的 2.615mm 和[DE;80/Sn150kV;Qr36;190keV]的 0.12HU。SQ、LQ 和 OQ 的最佳组合 z 分数分别为[DE;100/Sn150kV;Qr59;40keV]的 4.53、[DE;100/Sn150kV;Qr59;140keV]的 1.23 和[DE;90/Sn150kV;Qr59;50keV]的 2.95。SE 的最佳 OQ 排名第三,为[SE;90kV;Bv59]的 2.89。主观一致性很好(kappa=0.86;P<0.001),与 OQ 相关性良好(rs=0.94,P<0.001)。

结论 与 SECT 相比,结合最新的核和单能量后处理的 DE CT 采集可改善支架可视化。使用 Qr59 内核从 DECT 90/Sn 150kV 采集获得的 50keV 单能量重建可获得最佳的整体结果。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验