Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, The August Krogh Section for Human Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Sep 1;133(3):732-741. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00235.2022. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
It is unclear whether resistance training-induced myofiber hypertrophy is affected by sex, and whether myonuclear addition occurs in relation to the myonuclear domain and can contribute to explaining a potential sex-specific hypertrophic response. This study investigated the effect of 8 wk of resistance training on myofiber hypertrophy and myonuclear addition in 12 males (28 ± 7 yr; mean ± SD) and 12 females (27 ± 7 yr). Muscle biopsies were collected from m. vastus lateralis before and after the training intervention and were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for fiber type and size, satellite cells, and myonuclei. Hypertrophy of type I fibers was greater in males than females ( < 0.05), whereas hypertrophy of type II fibers was similar between sexes ( = 0.158-0.419). Expansion of the satellite cell pool ( = 0.132-0.667) and myonuclear addition ( = 0.064-0.228) did not differ significantly between sexes, irrespective of myofiber type. However, when individual responses to resistance training were assessed, myonuclear addition was strongly correlated with fiber hypertrophy ( = 0.68-0.85, < 0.001). Although myofiber hypertrophy was accompanied by an increase in myonuclear domain ( < 0.05), fiber perimeter per myonucleus remained constant throughout the study ( = 0.096-0.666). These findings indicate that myonuclear addition occurs in relation to the fiber perimeter per myonucleus, not the myonuclear domain, and has a substantial role in resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy but does not fully explain greater hypertrophy of type I fibers in males than females. Here, we show that resistance training-induced hypertrophy of type I fibers is greater in males than females. Myonuclear addition was strongly associated with fiber hypertrophy but did not differ between sexes in type I fibers. Furthermore, whereas muscle hypertrophy was accompanied by an increase in myonuclear domain, fiber perimeter per myonucleus remained constant. Thus, myonuclear addition occurs in relation to fiber perimeter during muscle hypertrophy but does not explain sex-specific hypertrophy of type I fibers.
目前尚不清楚抗阻训练引起的肌纤维肥大是否受性别影响,以及是否存在核内添加现象,以及核内添加是否与核内区有关,并有助于解释潜在的性别特异性肥大反应。本研究调查了 8 周抗阻训练对 12 名男性(28±7 岁;均值±标准差)和 12 名女性(27±7 岁)股外侧肌肌纤维肥大和核内添加的影响。在训练干预前后,从股外侧肌采集肌肉活检,并通过免疫组织化学分析纤维类型和大小、卫星细胞和肌核。Ⅰ型纤维的肥大程度在男性中大于女性(<0.05),而Ⅱ型纤维的肥大程度在性别间相似(=0.158-0.419)。卫星细胞池的扩张(=0.132-0.667)和核内添加(=0.064-0.228)在性别间没有显著差异,无论肌纤维类型如何。然而,当评估个体对抗阻训练的反应时,核内添加与纤维肥大呈强相关性(=0.68-0.85,<0.001)。尽管肌纤维肥大伴随着核内区的增加(<0.05),但在整个研究过程中,纤维周径与肌核数的比值保持不变(=0.096-0.666)。这些发现表明,核内添加与肌纤维周径有关,而与核内区无关,在抗阻训练引起的肌肉肥大中起重要作用,但不能完全解释男性比女性Ⅰ型纤维肥大程度更大的原因。在这里,我们表明,男性比女性的Ⅰ型纤维抗阻训练引起的肥大程度更大。核内添加与纤维肥大呈强相关性,但在Ⅰ型纤维中性别间没有差异。此外,尽管肌肉肥大伴随着核内区的增加,但纤维周径与肌核数的比值保持不变。因此,核内添加与肌肉肥大过程中的纤维周径有关,但不能解释Ⅰ型纤维的性别特异性肥大。