• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体的使用及策略对激励不同代际献血者的作用。我们做得对吗?

Social media usage and strategies in motivating various generations of blood donors. Are we doing it right?

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, ESIC Medical College Hospital, Sanath Nagar, Hyderabad 500038, India.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2023 Feb;62(1):103519. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2022.103519. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2022.103519
PMID:35953396
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to analyze social media platforms usage by blood donors, their responses to blood donation requests, most engaging ways of blood donor motivation from a donor perspective, and compare across different generations of blood donors.

METHODS

This research study is a Descriptive and quantitative cross-sectional analysis: a Google form Questionnaire-based survey conducted at Blood Centre, Tertiary-care Institute, South India (October 2020 to December 2020). All blood donors visiting the Blood Centre were eligible to participate in the survey. Facilities for blood donors to record their responses were made available using a QR code generated and displayed at the Blood Centre. The participants were categorized based on their age into different generations as: Generation Z currently aged 18-25 years, Millennials or Generation Y aged 26-40 years, and Generation X 41-58 years.

RESULTS

Total 600 Google-form responses collected were analyzed. Majority 580/600 (96.7%) participants actively used WhatsApp which remained the most frequently used Social media application across the three Generations X, Y, and Z of blood donors. 72% of Generation X and 60% of Millennials found live interactive sessions as more engaging than Generation Z (49%) (p < 0.05). Generation X donors found Newspaper (55%) and FM (47%) more engaging compared to Millennials (27%, 28%) and Generation Z (26%, 15%) (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Although Social Media usage is in practice for blood donor motivation and recruitment, tailored motivational content is essential to target the blood donors across different age generations to achieve effective blood donor motivation leading to Blood donation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析献血者对社交媒体平台的使用情况、他们对献血请求的回应、从献血者角度出发最能激发献血积极性的方式,并对不同代际的献血者进行比较。

方法

这是一项描述性和定量的横断面分析研究:在印度南部的一家三级保健研究所的血液中心进行了基于谷歌表单的问卷调查(2020 年 10 月至 12 月)。所有到访血液中心的献血者都有资格参与这项调查。通过在血液中心生成并显示二维码,为献血者提供了记录他们回复的设施。参与者根据年龄分为不同的世代,分别为:Z 世代,年龄为 18-25 岁;千禧一代或 Y 世代,年龄为 26-40 岁;X 世代,年龄为 41-58 岁。

结果

共分析了 600 份谷歌表单回复。580/600(96.7%)名参与者积极使用 WhatsApp,这是三个世代(X、Y 和 Z)的献血者中最常使用的社交媒体应用程序。72%的 X 世代和 60%的千禧一代认为现场互动会议比 Z 世代(49%)更具吸引力(p<0.05)。X 世代的献血者发现报纸(55%)和调频广播(47%)比千禧一代(27%、28%)和 Z 世代(26%、15%)更具吸引力(p<0.05)。

讨论

尽管社交媒体的使用在献血者激励和招募方面已经得到了实践,但针对不同年龄世代的献血者,制作定制化的激励内容是至关重要的,以实现有效的献血者激励,从而促进献血。

相似文献

1
Social media usage and strategies in motivating various generations of blood donors. Are we doing it right?社交媒体的使用及策略对激励不同代际献血者的作用。我们做得对吗?
Transfus Apher Sci. 2023 Feb;62(1):103519. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2022.103519. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
The role of social media for blood donor motivation and recruitment.社交媒体在献血者激励和招募方面的作用。
Transfusion. 2018 Oct;58(10):2257-2259. doi: 10.1111/trf.14823. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Comparison of Smartphone Ownership, Social Media Use, and Willingness to Use Digital Interventions Between Generation Z and Millennials in the Treatment of Substance Use: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.Z 世代与千禧一代在物质使用治疗中智能手机拥有情况、社交媒体使用情况及使用数字干预意愿的比较:横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 17;21(4):e13050. doi: 10.2196/13050.
4
Motivational factors for blood donation in first-time donors and repeat donors: a cross-sectional study in West Pomerania.首次献血者和重复献血者献血的动机因素:在西波美拉尼亚进行的一项横断面研究。
Transfus Med. 2017 Dec;27(6):413-420. doi: 10.1111/tme.12450. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
5
Knowledge level and motivation of Hong Kong young adults towards blood donation: a cross-sectional survey.香港青年对献血的认知水平和动机:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 19;10(1):e031865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031865.
6
The impact of social media intervention based on functional motivation on repeat blood donation behavior: A prospective randomized controlled trial study.基于功能动机的社交媒体干预对重复献血行为的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验研究。
Transfusion. 2024 Jul;64(7):1233-1241. doi: 10.1111/trf.17870. Epub 2024 May 15.
7
Variation of motivation between weekday and weekend donors and their association with distance from blood donation centres.工作日与周末献血者之间的动机差异及其与距献血中心距离的关联。
Transfus Med. 2013 Jun;23(3):152-9. doi: 10.1111/tme.12034. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
8
[Motivation and sociology of blood donors in Tunisia: reality and perspectives].[突尼斯献血者的动机与社会学:现状与展望]
Transfus Clin Biol. 2013 Dec;20(5-6):469-75. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
Plateletpheresis donation through donor awareness, motivation, and recruitment drives: A unique concept and experience from a tertiary care oncology centre in India.通过提高献血者意识、激发积极性和开展招募活动来进行血小板单采捐献:印度一家三级肿瘤护理中心的独特理念与经验。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2022 Feb;29(1):65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Knowledge, attitude and beliefs of people in North India regarding blood donation.印度北部民众对献血的知识、态度和信念。
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s21-7. doi: 10.2450/2012.0058-12. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Hematopoietic stem cell donation in social media: Content analysis of YouTube videos.社交媒体中的造血干细胞捐献:YouTube视频内容分析
Transfusion. 2025 Jul;65(7):1352-1359. doi: 10.1111/trf.18259. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Engaging blood donors as advocates: Social media preferences and associations with marketing stimuli.让献血者成为倡导者:社交媒体偏好及其与营销刺激因素的关联。
Transfusion. 2025 Apr;65(4):708-718. doi: 10.1111/trf.18166. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
3
Research on the effectiveness and strategies of new media in promoting voluntary blood donation from a public health perspective in the post-pandemic era.
从公共卫生视角研究后疫情时代新媒体在促进自愿无偿献血方面的效果和策略。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;12:1436909. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1436909. eCollection 2024.