School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 11;12(1):12655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16406-w.
Birds living in developed areas contend with numerous stressors, including human disturbance and light, noise, and air pollution. COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns presented a unique opportunity to disentangle these effects during a period of reduced human activity. We launched a community science project in spring 2020 to explore drivers of site use by and detection of common birds in cities under lockdown in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Our goals were twofold: (1) consider how intensity of urbanization, canopy cover, and availability of bird feeders and bird baths influenced avian habitat use; and (2) quantify how daily changes in weather, air pollution, and human mobility influenced detection of birds. We analyzed 6,640 surveys from 367 volunteers at 429 monitoring sites using occupancy models for 46 study species. Neither land cover nor canopy cover influenced site use by 50% of study species, suggesting that backyard birds may have used a wider range of habitats during lockdowns. Human mobility affected detection of 76% of study species, suggesting that birds exhibited species-specific behavioral responses to day-to-day changes in human activity beginning shortly after initial lockdown restrictions were implemented. Our study also showcases how existing community science platforms can be leveraged to support local monitoring efforts.
生活在发达地区的鸟类面临着许多压力源,包括人类干扰以及光、噪音和空气污染。COVID-19 大流行封锁为在人类活动减少的时期解开这些影响提供了一个独特的机会。我们在 2020 年春季发起了一项社区科学项目,以探索在封锁期间美国太平洋西北地区城市中鸟类栖息地利用和鸟类检测的驱动因素。我们的目标有两个:(1)考虑城市发展强度、树冠覆盖、鸟类喂食器和鸟类浴池的可用性如何影响鸟类栖息地的利用;(2)量化天气、空气污染和人类流动性的日常变化如何影响鸟类的检测。我们使用 46 种研究物种的占用模型,分析了 367 名志愿者在 429 个监测点的 6640 次调查。没有土地覆盖或树冠覆盖影响了 50%的研究物种的站点利用,这表明后院鸟类在封锁期间可能使用了更广泛的栖息地。人类流动性影响了 76%的研究物种的检测,这表明鸟类在最初实施封锁限制后不久,就开始对人类活动的日常变化表现出特定于物种的行为反应。我们的研究还展示了如何利用现有的社区科学平台来支持当地的监测工作。