• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家登记处能否有助于预测癌症风险?癌症风险评估模型(CRAM)。

Can National Registries Contribute to Predict the Risk of Cancer? The Cancer Risk Assessment Model (CRAM).

作者信息

Jarbøl Dorte E, Hyldig Nana, Möller Sören, Wehberg Sonja, Rasmussen Sanne, Balasubramaniam Kirubakaran, Haastrup Peter F, Søndergaard Jens, Rubin Katrine H

机构信息

Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.

OPEN-Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 6;14(15):3823. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153823.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14153823
PMID:35954486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9367495/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop a predictive model based on Danish administrative registers to facilitate automated identification of individuals at risk of any type of cancer.

METHODS

A nationwide register-based cohort study covering all individuals in Denmark aged +20 years. The outcome was all-type cancer during 2017 excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer. Diagnoses, medication, and contact with general practitioners in the exposure period (2007-2016) were considered for the predictive model. We applied backward selection to all variables by logistic regression to develop a risk model for cancer. We applied the models to the validation cohort, calculated the receiver operating characteristic curves, and estimated the corresponding areas under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 4.2 million persons; 32,447 (0.76%) were diagnosed with cancer in 2017. We identified 39 predictive risk factors in women and 42 in men, with age above 30 as the strongest predictor for cancer. Testing the model for cancer risk showed modest accuracy, with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.82) for men and 0.75 (95% CI 0.74-0.75) for women.

CONCLUSION

We have developed and tested a model for identifying the individual risk of cancer through the use of administrative data. The models need to be further investigated before being applied to clinical practice.

摘要

目的

基于丹麦行政登记数据开发一种预测模型,以促进对有患任何类型癌症风险个体的自动识别。

方法

一项基于全国登记数据的队列研究,涵盖丹麦所有20岁及以上的个体。结局为2017年期间除非黑色素瘤皮肤癌外的所有类型癌症。预测模型考虑暴露期(2007 - 2016年)的诊断、用药情况以及与全科医生的接触情况。我们通过逻辑回归对所有变量进行向后选择,以建立癌症风险模型。我们将模型应用于验证队列,计算受试者工作特征曲线,并估计相应的曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

研究人群包括420万人;2017年有32447人(0.76%)被诊断患有癌症。我们在女性中识别出39个预测风险因素,在男性中识别出42个,年龄超过30岁是癌症最强的预测因素。对癌症风险模型进行测试显示准确性一般,男性的AUC为0.82(95%CI 0.81 - 0.82),女性为0.75(95%CI 0.74 - 0.75)。

结论

我们开发并测试了一种通过使用行政数据识别个体癌症风险的模型。在应用于临床实践之前,该模型需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49e4/9367495/dd20929c3115/cancers-14-03823-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49e4/9367495/4fa563fa631d/cancers-14-03823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49e4/9367495/dd20929c3115/cancers-14-03823-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49e4/9367495/4fa563fa631d/cancers-14-03823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49e4/9367495/dd20929c3115/cancers-14-03823-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Can National Registries Contribute to Predict the Risk of Cancer? The Cancer Risk Assessment Model (CRAM).国家登记处能否有助于预测癌症风险?癌症风险评估模型(CRAM)。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 6;14(15):3823. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153823.
2
Developing and Validating a Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.开发并验证肺癌风险预测模型:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;15(2):487. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020487.
3
A New Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FREM) Based on Public Health Registries.基于公共卫生注册系统的新型骨折风险评估工具(FREM)。
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Nov;33(11):1967-1979. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3528. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
4
Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: external validation of the IRIS algorithm.足月小于胎龄儿产时胎儿窘迫行剖宫产术的风险:IRIS 算法的外部验证。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(16):2775-2784. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1560412. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Venous Thrombosis Risk after Cast Immobilization of the Lower Extremity: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Score, L-TRiP(cast), in Three Population-Based Case-Control Studies.下肢石膏固定后的静脉血栓形成风险:三项基于人群的病例对照研究中临床预测评分L-TRiP(石膏固定)的推导与验证
PLoS Med. 2015 Nov 10;12(11):e1001899; discussion e1001899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001899. eCollection 2015 Nov.
6
Spirometry utilisation among Danish adults initiating medication targeting obstructive lung disease.丹麦开始使用针对阻塞性肺病药物治疗的成年人的肺活量测定法使用情况。
Dan Med J. 2015 Feb;62(2).
7
Enhancing the prediction of acute kidney injury risk after percutaneous coronary intervention using machine learning techniques: A retrospective cohort study.利用机器学习技术提高经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤风险的预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002703. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Mortality and morbidity in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta in Denmark.丹麦成骨不全患者的死亡率和发病率。
Dan Med J. 2018 Apr;65(4).
9
Assessment of Deep Learning Using Nonimaging Information and Sequential Medical Records to Develop a Prediction Model for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.利用非成像信息和连续医疗记录评估深度学习以开发非黑色素瘤皮肤癌预测模型。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Nov 1;155(11):1277-1283. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.2335.
10
Identification of endometrial cancer recurrence - a validated algorithm based on nationwide Danish registries.子宫内膜癌复发的识别——基于丹麦全国登记处的一种经过验证的算法
Acta Oncol. 2021 Apr;60(4):452-458. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1859133. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and External Validation of Partial Proportional Odds Risk Prediction Models for Cancer Stage at Diagnosis among Males and Females in Canada.加拿大男性和女性癌症诊断时癌症分期的部分比例优势风险预测模型的开发与外部验证
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 8;15(14):3545. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143545.
2
Developing and Validating a Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.开发并验证肺癌风险预测模型:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;15(2):487. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020487.

本文引用的文献

1
Improve individual treatment by comparing treatment benefits: cancer artificial intelligence survival analysis system for cervical carcinoma.通过比较治疗获益改善个体治疗:宫颈癌人工智能生存分析系统。
J Transl Med. 2022 Jun 28;20(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03491-8.
2
Multimodal data integration using machine learning improves risk stratification of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.基于机器学习的多模态数据整合提高了高级别浆液性卵巢癌的风险分层。
Nat Cancer. 2022 Jun;3(6):723-733. doi: 10.1038/s43018-022-00388-9. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
A Comparison of Logistic Regression Against Machine Learning Algorithms for Gastric Cancer Risk Prediction Within Real-World Clinical Data Streams.
基于真实世界临床数据流的胃癌风险预测中逻辑回归与机器学习算法的比较。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jun;6:e2200039. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00039.
4
Developing a Diagnostic Multivariable Prediction Model for Urinary Tract Cancer in Patients Referred with Haematuria: Results from the IDENTIFY Collaborative Study.为血尿转诊患者开发尿路癌诊断多变量预测模型:IDENTIFY合作研究结果
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1673-1682. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
5
Predictive values of lung cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study.肺癌报警症状在普通人群中的预测价值:一项全国性队列研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Apr 7;30(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0173-3.
6
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
7
Advanced-stage cancer and time to diagnosis: An International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) cross-sectional study.晚期癌症与诊断时间:国际癌症标杆合作组织(ICBP)的一项横断面研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Sep;28(5):e13100. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13100. Epub 2019 May 22.
8
Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study.一般人群中结直肠癌报警症状的预测价值:一项全国性队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Mar;120(6):595-600. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
A New Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FREM) Based on Public Health Registries.基于公共卫生注册系统的新型骨折风险评估工具(FREM)。
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Nov;33(11):1967-1979. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3528. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Predictive values of upper gastrointestinal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study.上消化道癌报警症状在一般人群中的预测价值:一项全国性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4376-8.