• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于公共卫生注册系统的新型骨折风险评估工具(FREM)。

A New Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FREM) Based on Public Health Registries.

机构信息

OPEN-Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Nov;33(11):1967-1979. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3528. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1002/jbmr.3528
PMID:29924428
Abstract

Some conditions are already known to be associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Other conditions may also be significant indicators of increased risk. The aim of the current study was to identify conditions for inclusion in a fracture prediction model (fracture risk evaluation model [FREM]) for automated case finding of high-risk individuals of hip or major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). We included the total population of Denmark aged 45+ years (N = 2,495,339). All hospital diagnoses from 1998 to 2012 were used as possible conditions; the primary outcome was MOFs during 2013. Our cohort was split randomly 50/50 into a development and a validation dataset for deriving and validating the predictive model. We applied backward selection on ICD-10 codes (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision) by logistic regression to develop an age-adjusted and sex-stratified model. The FREM for MOFs included 38 and 43 risk factors for women and men, respectively. Testing FREM for MOFs in the validation cohort showed good accuracy; it produced receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.750 (95% CI, 0.741 to 0.795) and 0.752 (95% CI, 0.743 to 0.761) for women and men, respectively. The FREM for hip fractures included 32 risk factors for both genders and showed an even higher accuracy in the validation cohort as AUCs of 0.874 (95% CI, 0.869 to 0.879) and 0.851 (95% CI, 0.841 to 0.861) for women and men were found, respectively. We have developed and tested a prediction model (FREM) for identifying men and women at high risk of MOFs or hip fractures by using solely existing administrative data. The FREM could be employed either at the point of care integrated into electronic patient record systems to alert physicians or deployed centrally in a national case-finding strategy where patients at high fracture risk could be invited to a focused DXA program. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

摘要

一些病症已被证实与骨质疏松性骨折风险增加有关。其他病症也可能是增加风险的重要指标。本研究的目的是确定纳入骨折预测模型(骨折风险评估模型 [FREM])的病症,以自动发现髋部或主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)高危人群。我们纳入了丹麦所有年龄在 45 岁以上的人群(N=2,495,339)。使用 1998 年至 2012 年的所有医院诊断作为可能的病症;主要结局是 2013 年的 MOF。我们的队列随机分为 50/50 的开发和验证数据集,用于推导和验证预测模型。我们应用逻辑回归对 ICD-10 代码(国际疾病分类和相关健康问题,第 10 版)进行向后选择,以开发一个年龄调整和性别分层的模型。MOF 的 FREM 分别为女性和男性纳入 38 个和 43 个风险因素。在验证队列中测试 MOF 的 FREM 显示出良好的准确性;它产生的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.750(95%CI,0.741 至 0.795)和 0.752(95%CI,0.743 至 0.761)。髋部骨折的 FREM 包括两性的 32 个风险因素,在验证队列中表现出更高的准确性,女性的 AUC 为 0.874(95%CI,0.869 至 0.879),男性为 0.851(95%CI,0.841 至 0.861)。我们已经开发并测试了一种预测模型(FREM),仅使用现有的行政数据来识别 MOF 或髋部骨折风险较高的男性和女性。FREM 可以在护理点集成到电子患者记录系统中以提醒医生使用,也可以在中央部署全国病例发现策略,在该策略中,可以邀请高骨折风险的患者参加重点 DXA 计划。

相似文献

1
A New Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FREM) Based on Public Health Registries.基于公共卫生注册系统的新型骨折风险评估工具(FREM)。
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Nov;33(11):1967-1979. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3528. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
Validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) in predicting major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures using administrative health data.利用行政健康数据验证骨折风险评估模型(FREM)在预测主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折中的作用。
Bone. 2021 Jun;147:115934. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115934. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
3
Prediction of imminent fracture risk in Canadian women and men aged 45 years or older: external validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM).预测加拿大 45 岁及以上女性和男性的骨折风险:骨折风险评估模型(FREM)的外部验证。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jan;33(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06165-1. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.西班牙FRAX模型在预测骨质疏松性骨折决策中的原理:西班牙女性FRIDEX队列的更新
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 17;17:262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6.
5
Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.FRAX 验证及自我报告的老年人跌倒对一般人群的影响:挪威 HUNT 研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2935-2944. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4134-9. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
6
Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.英国初级保健中预测骨质疏松性骨折风险的 QFracture 算法的推导和验证:前瞻性开放队列研究。
BMJ. 2012 May 22;344:e3427. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3427.
7
Fracture Risk Assessment With FRAX Using Real-World Data in a Population-Based Cohort From Israel.基于以色列人群的真实世界数据应用 FRAX 进行骨折风险评估。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 1;187(1):94-102. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx128.
8
External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.利用基于人群的电子健康记录数据对三种骨质疏松性骨折风险预测工具进行外部验证和比较:回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Jan 19;356:i6755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6755.
9
10
Prediction of Osteoporotic Fractures in Elderly Individuals: A Derivation and Internal Validation Study Using Healthcare Administrative Data.利用医疗保健管理数据预测老年人骨质疏松性骨折:推导和内部验证研究。
J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Dec;36(12):2329-2342. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4438. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of imminent osteoporotic fracture risk in Danish postmenopausal women-can the addition of self-reported clinical risk factors improve the prediction of the register-based FREM algorithm?丹麦绝经后女性骨质疏松性骨折风险的预测——添加自我报告的临床风险因素能否改善基于登记处的FREM算法的预测?
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Feb 7;20(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01493-1.
2
An electronic health record (EHR)-based risk calculator can predict fractures comparably to FRAX: a proof-of-concept study.基于电子健康记录(EHR)的风险计算器可与 FRAX 相当预测骨折:概念验证研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Dec;35(12):2117-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07221-2. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Patient Embeddings From Diagnosis Codes for Health Care Prediction Tasks: Pat2Vec Machine Learning Framework.
用于医疗保健预测任务的诊断代码患者嵌入:Pat2Vec机器学习框架
JMIR AI. 2023 Apr 21;2:e40755. doi: 10.2196/40755.
4
Validity of Major Osteoporotic Fracture Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry.丹麦国家患者登记处主要骨质疏松性骨折诊断的有效性
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 13;16:257-266. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S444447. eCollection 2024.
5
Predictive value of machine learning on fracture risk in osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习在骨质疏松性骨折风险预测中的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e071430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071430.
6
Excess mortality following a first and subsequent osteoporotic fracture: a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study on the mediating effects of comorbidities.首次和随后骨质疏松性骨折后的超额死亡率:一项基于丹麦全国登记的队列研究,探讨合并症的中介效应。
RMD Open. 2023 Nov 29;9(4):e003524. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003524.
7
An enhanced version of FREM (Fracture Risk Evaluation Model) using national administrative health data: analysis protocol for development and validation of a multivariable prediction model.使用国家行政卫生数据的FREM(骨折风险评估模型)增强版:多变量预测模型开发与验证的分析方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2023 Oct 3;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41512-023-00158-w.
8
Development and validation of sex-specific hip fracture prediction models using electronic health records: a retrospective, population-based cohort study.利用电子健康记录开发和验证特定性别的髋部骨折预测模型:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Feb 27;58:101876. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101876. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Can National Registries Contribute to Predict the Risk of Cancer? The Cancer Risk Assessment Model (CRAM).国家登记处能否有助于预测癌症风险?癌症风险评估模型(CRAM)。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 6;14(15):3823. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153823.
10
Prediction Models for Osteoporotic Fractures Risk: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.骨质疏松性骨折风险预测模型:系统评价与批判性评估
Aging Dis. 2022 Jul 11;13(4):1215-1238. doi: 10.14336/AD.2021.1206.