• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兴奋剂流行率与社会经济参数的关系:按运动项目和世界区域的分析。

Relationship between Doping Prevalence and Socioeconomic Parameters: An Analysis by Sport Categories and World Areas.

机构信息

CELAD, Spanish Commission of Anti-Doping Fight, 29016 Madrid, Spain.

International Sports Medicine Chair, Catholic University of San Antonio, 30107 Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159329.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159329
PMID:35954686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9367925/
Abstract

Socioeconomic differences between countries, including corruption and doping scandals, have increased in the last few decades. The aims of the current investigation were to examine doping prevalence according to world areas and sport groups and its association with socioeconomic factors worldwide. The Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) of 160 countries competing at 2016 Olympics were analyzed between 2013 and 2018. In addition, the relationship between doping prevalence and socioeconomic characteristics, including Human Development Index (HDI), Per Capita Income (PCI) and Corruption Index (CI), was investigated. Africa, Asia, and America were revealed to have a significantly lower doping prevalence than Europe and Oceania when observing the sum and the mean ADRV/10,000 inhabitants (p < 0.01). Strong to moderate correlations were identified between Corruption Index and ADRVs and HDI and ADRVs (p < 0.01). However, the number of Olympic athletes was positively associated with the ADRVs and the HDI (r = 0.663 and 0.424, respectively). In the comparison by sport groups, the Independent Recognized Sports (AIMS) showed significantly higher Adverse Analytical Findings (AAF) and ADRVs (p < 0.01) than Olympic and Recognized International Sports (ARISF). In conclusion, the results of the current study reveal doping prevalence differences between world areas and sport categories, identifying associations with socioeconomic characteristics of each country.

摘要

在过去的几十年里,国家之间的社会经济差异(包括腐败和兴奋剂丑闻)有所增加。本研究旨在根据世界地区和运动项目检查兴奋剂的流行情况及其与全球社会经济因素的关系。分析了 2013 年至 2018 年期间 160 个参加 2016 年奥运会的国家的反兴奋剂规则违规行为(ADRV)。此外,还研究了兴奋剂流行率与社会经济特征(包括人类发展指数(HDI)、人均收入(PCI)和腐败指数(CI))之间的关系。当观察总和和平均 ADRV/10,000 居民时,非洲、亚洲和美洲的兴奋剂流行率明显低于欧洲和大洋洲(p<0.01)。腐败指数与 ADRV 和 HDI 之间存在强到中度相关性(p<0.01)。然而,奥运会运动员人数与 ADRV 和 HDI 呈正相关(r=0.663 和 0.424)。在按运动项目进行比较时,独立认可运动(AIMS)的阳性分析结果(AAF)和 ADRV 明显高于奥运会和认可国际运动(ARISF)(p<0.01)。总之,本研究结果揭示了世界地区和运动项目之间的兴奋剂流行率差异,并确定了与各国社会经济特征的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/9367925/5d21439ca751/ijerph-19-09329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/9367925/5d21439ca751/ijerph-19-09329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285d/9367925/5d21439ca751/ijerph-19-09329-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between Doping Prevalence and Socioeconomic Parameters: An Analysis by Sport Categories and World Areas.兴奋剂流行率与社会经济参数的关系:按运动项目和世界区域的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159329.
2
Intelligence-based doping control planning improves testing effectiveness: Perspectives from a national anti-doping organisation.基于情报的兴奋剂控制规划提高了检测效果:来自一个国家反兴奋剂组织的观点。
Drug Test Anal. 2023 May;15(5):506-515. doi: 10.1002/dta.3435. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
Analysis of Anti-Doping Rule Violations That Have Impacted Medal Results at the Summer Olympic Games 1968-2012.1968 年至 2012 年夏季奥运会奖牌结果受影响的兴奋剂违规行为分析。
Sports Med. 2021 Oct;51(10):2221-2229. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01463-4. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
4
Doping in Paralympic sport: perceptions, responsibility and anti-doping education experiences from the perspective of Paralympic athletes and parasport coaches.残奥会运动中的使用兴奋剂问题:从残奥会运动员和残疾人体育运动教练的角度看认知、责任及反兴奋剂教育经历
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jul 7;5:1166139. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1166139. eCollection 2023.
5
Doping in the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC): A 4-year epidemiological analysis.终极格斗冠军赛(UFC)中的兴奋剂问题:一项为期 4 年的流行病学分析。
Drug Test Anal. 2021 Apr;13(4):785-793. doi: 10.1002/dta.2987. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
6
Recreational Athletes' Use of Performance-Enhancing Substances: Results from the First European Randomized Response Technique Survey.业余运动员使用提高成绩的物质:欧洲首次随机应答技术调查结果
Sports Med Open. 2023 Jan 8;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00548-2.
7
Doping practices in international weightlifting: analysis of sanctioned athletes/support personnel from 2008 to 2019 and retesting of samples from the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games.国际举重运动中的兴奋剂违规行为:对2008年至2019年被制裁的运动员/支持人员的分析以及对2008年和2012年奥运会样本的重新检测。
Sports Med Open. 2021 Jan 7;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00293-4.
8
Doping Prevalence in Competitive Sport: Evidence Synthesis with "Best Practice" Recommendations and Reporting Guidelines from the WADA Working Group on Doping Prevalence.竞技体育中的兴奋剂问题:WADA 兴奋剂流行问题工作组的“最佳实践”建议和报告指南的证据综合。
Sports Med. 2021 Sep;51(9):1909-1934. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01477-y. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
The athletic characteristics of Olympic sports to assist anti-doping strategies.奥运会项目的运动特征助力反兴奋剂策略。
Drug Test Anal. 2022 Sep;14(9):1599-1613. doi: 10.1002/dta.3329. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
10
Is there a danger for myopia in anti-doping education? Comparative analysis of substance use and misuse in Olympic racket sports calls for a broader approach.反兴奋剂教育是否存在近视风险?对奥林匹克球拍运动中物质使用和滥用的比较分析呼吁采取更广泛的方法。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011 Oct 11;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-27.

本文引用的文献

1
Doping Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices among Young, Amateur Croatian Athletes.克罗地亚年轻业余运动员的兴奋剂态度、信念及行为
Sports (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;9(2):25. doi: 10.3390/sports9020025.
2
Outcomes of adverse analytical findings in individual and team sports.个体和团体运动中不良分析结果的结果。
Bioanalysis. 2021 Jan;13(1):5-11. doi: 10.4155/bio-2020-0263. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
No standarisation or harmonisation in anti-doping testing frequency.反兴奋剂检测频率没有标准化或统一化。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Sep 23;6(1):e000739. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000793. eCollection 2020.
4
"Doing What Is Right and Doing It Right": A Mapping Review of Athletes' Perception of Anti-Doping Legitimacy.“做正确的事并正确地去做”:运动员对反兴奋剂合法性认知的映射性综述
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Oct;84:102865. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102865. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Perfectionism and attitudes towards doping in junior athletes.青少年运动员的完美主义及对使用兴奋剂的态度
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(8):700-6. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1068441. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
6
Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods.精英体育中使用兴奋剂的流行情况:数量与方法综述
Sports Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x.
7
Challenges and threats to implementing the fight against doping in sport.实施体育反兴奋剂斗争面临的挑战与威胁。
Br J Sports Med. 2014 May;48(10):807-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093589.
8
Motivational and social cognitive predictors of doping intentions in elite sports: an integrated approach.精英运动中兴奋剂意图的动机和社会认知预测因素:一种综合方法。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Oct;23(5):e330-40. doi: 10.1111/sms.12068. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.运动中的兴奋剂:对精英运动员的态度、信念和知识的回顾。
Sports Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):395-411. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x.
10
Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes: a social cognition approach.精英运动员兴奋剂意向的预测因素:一种社会认知方法。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Oct;32(5):694-710. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.5.694.