Suppr超能文献

采用经过验证的问卷评估口腔黏膜疾病,以提高牙科学学生教学效果的前瞻性对比分析。

A Prospective Comparative Analysis Regarding the Assessment of Oral Mucosal Disease Using a Validated Questionnaire to Improve the Teaching of Dental Students.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstraße 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159663.

Abstract

Structured examination and treatment are essential in medicine. For dental students, a structured approach to the assessment of oral mucosal lesions is missing thus far. To validate an approach, a structured questionnaire was compared with the habitually used free description of oral lesions (white lesions, ulcers, hyperplasia). Thirty-three dental students were divided into two groups (Group 1 ( = 17) used the free description; Group 2 ( = 16) used a guided questionnaire) to characterize mucosal lesions in patients and make a tentative diagnosis. Although no difference was found between the groups regarding the suspected diagnosis or the histopathological findings, there was a significant advantage of the structured questionnaire in all aspects of the description compared to the free description ( = 0.000018). Thus, a structured description is an important aspect in the evaluation of oral mucosal changes, and a guided questionnaire should be implemented in the study of dentistry.

摘要

医学中,有结构的检查和治疗至关重要。到目前为止,对于牙科学学生来说,他们在评估口腔黏膜病变时还缺乏这种有结构的方法。为了验证这种方法,我们将一个结构化问卷与习惯性使用的口腔病变自由描述(白色病变、溃疡、增生)进行了比较。33 名牙科学学生被分为两组(第 1 组(n = 17)使用自由描述;第 2 组(n = 16)使用引导问卷)来描述患者的黏膜病变并做出初步诊断。尽管两组在疑似诊断或组织病理学发现方面没有差异,但与自由描述相比,结构化问卷在描述的所有方面都具有显著优势(p = 0.000018)。因此,结构化描述是评估口腔黏膜变化的一个重要方面,在牙科学研究中应该采用引导问卷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验