Brzeziński Karol, Duda Adam, Styk Adam, Kowaluk Tomasz
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Armii Ludowej Ave. 16, 00-637 Warsaw, Poland.
Faculty of Civil and Transport Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 5, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;15(15):5388. doi: 10.3390/ma15155388.
This paper presents a photogrammetry-based volume measurement framework for the particle density estimation of Lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA). The results are compared with computed tomography (CT) and Archimedes' method measurements. All of the steps required in order to apply the proposed approach are explained. Next, we discuss how the interpretation of open pores affects the results of volume measurements. We propose to process the shapes obtained from different methods by applying an Ambient Occlusion algorithm with the same threshold, = 0.175. The difference between the CT and SfM methods is less than 0.006 g/cm, proving that the photogrammetry-based approach is accurate enough. The Archimedes' method significantly overestimates the density of the particles. Nevertheless, its accuracy is acceptable for most engineering purposes. Additionally, we evaluate the accuracy of shape reconstruction (in terms of the Hausdorff distance). For 95% of the grain's surface, the maximum error is between 0.073 mm and 0.129 mm (depending on the grain shape). The presented approach is helpful for measuring the particle density of porous aggregates. The proposed methodology can be utilized in order to estimate intergranular porosity, which is valuable information for the calibration of DEM models.
本文提出了一种基于摄影测量的轻量膨胀黏土集料(LECA)颗粒密度估计的体积测量框架。将结果与计算机断层扫描(CT)和阿基米德法测量结果进行了比较。解释了应用所提方法所需的所有步骤。接下来,我们讨论了开孔孔隙的解释如何影响体积测量结果。我们建议通过应用具有相同阈值(= 0.175)的环境光遮蔽算法来处理从不同方法获得的形状。CT方法和基于结构光运动(SfM)的方法之间的差异小于0.006 g/cm,证明基于摄影测量的方法足够准确。阿基米德法显著高估了颗粒的密度。然而,其精度对于大多数工程目的来说是可以接受的。此外,我们评估了形状重建的精度(根据豪斯多夫距离)。对于95%的颗粒表面,最大误差在0.073毫米至0.129毫米之间(取决于颗粒形状)。所提出的方法有助于测量多孔集料的颗粒密度。所提方法可用于估计颗粒间孔隙率,这对于离散元模型(DEM)的校准是有价值的信息。