• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1984年选举中的堕胎问题。

The abortion issue in the 1984 elections.

作者信息

Granberg D

出版信息

Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Mar-Apr;19(2):59-62.

PMID:3595819
Abstract

In the 1984 election, Ronald Reagan, the Republican presidential incumbent and an opponent of legal abortion, defeated Walter Mondale, a prochoice Democrat, by a wide margin. Despite Reagan's sweep of 49 states, however, conservatives lost a little ground in the Senate, where four of the seven new senators elected take a prochoice position on abortion. On the other hand, antiabortion forces registered some gains in the House of Representatives. The voting groups were more divided over the abortion issue in 1984 than they had been in 1980: In 1980, Reagan voters and Carter voters did not differ significantly in their attitudes toward abortion, but in 1984, Reagan voters were significantly more likely to be opposed to abortion than were Mondale voters. Nevertheless, only a small minority of voters considered abortion to be a major national issue, and the two voter groups were far more divided on several other issues than they were on abortion. There was no antiabortion consensus among the electorate as a whole, or among Reagan voters in particular. The level of approval for legalized abortion has, in fact, remained quite stable since 1973, and a popular base in favor of banning abortion seems to be lacking.

摘要

在1984年的选举中,时任共和党总统且反对合法堕胎的罗纳德·里根以较大优势击败了支持堕胎选择权的民主党人沃尔特·蒙代尔。然而,尽管里根赢得了49个州,但保守派在参议院稍有失利,新当选的七名参议员中有四人在堕胎问题上支持堕胎选择权。另一方面,反堕胎势力在众议院取得了一些进展。1984年,各投票群体在堕胎问题上比1980年更加分化:1980年,里根的选民和卡特的选民在堕胎态度上没有显著差异,但在1984年,里根的选民比蒙代尔的选民更有可能反对堕胎。尽管如此,只有一小部分选民认为堕胎是一个重大的国家问题,而且这两个选民群体在其他几个问题上的分歧远比在堕胎问题上的分歧大。在全体选民中,尤其是在里根的选民中,并没有反堕胎的共识。事实上,自1973年以来,对合法堕胎的支持率一直相当稳定,而且似乎缺乏支持禁止堕胎的民众基础。

相似文献

1
The abortion issue in the 1984 elections.1984年选举中的堕胎问题。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Mar-Apr;19(2):59-62.
2
The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.1980年选举中的堕胎问题。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Sep-Oct;15(5):231-8.
3
Abortion and the presidential election of 1976: a multivariate analysis of voting behavior.堕胎与1976年总统选举:投票行为的多变量分析
Mich Law Rev. 1979 Aug;77(7):1750-71.
4
Reproductive rights on firmer ground with prochoice White House, Congress. Special report -- abortion and the 1992 elections.支持堕胎合法化的白宫和国会使生殖权利更有保障。特别报道——堕胎与1992年选举。
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst. 1992 Nov 12(18):1-2.
5
Is support of abortion political suicide?支持堕胎是政治自杀行为吗?
Fam Plann Perspect. 1975 Jan-Feb;7(1):13-22.
6
Abortion and the 1978 Congressional elections.堕胎与1978年国会选举。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 Sep-Oct;12(5):238-46.
7
The politics of abortion: a historical perspective.堕胎政治:历史视角
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):127-31. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80245-2.
8
Health care in the 2004 presidential election.2004年总统选举中的医疗保健问题。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1314-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042360.
9
Voters and health care in the 2004 election.2004年选举中的选民与医疗保健
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-86-W5-96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.86.
10
The people vote on abortion funding: Colorado and Washington.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Jul-Aug;17(4):155-9.