• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Parentification in Polish Adolescents: a Prevalence Study.波兰青少年中的亲子角色颠倒:一项患病率研究。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2021 Oct 25;15(3):567-583. doi: 10.1007/s40653-021-00411-8. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Growing up too soon? Parentification among immigrant and native adolescents in Germany.成长得太快了?德国移民和本地青少年中的父母化现象。
J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Jul;41(7):880-93. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9711-1. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
3
Exploring Resiliency and Parentification in Polish Adolescents.探索波兰青少年的韧性和代际养育现象。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21):11454. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111454.
4
The Relations Among Types of Parentification, School Achievement, and Quality of Life in Early Adolescence: An Exploratory Study.青少年早期亲职化类型、学业成绩与生活质量之间的关系:一项探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 29;12:635171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635171. eCollection 2021.
5
Childhood Caregiving Roles, Perceptions of Benefits, and Future Caregiving Intentions Among Typically Developing Adult Siblings of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍患者的典型成年兄弟姐妹的育儿角色、对益处的看法和未来育儿意向。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Apr;48(4):1199-1209. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3464-6.
6
Ethnic differences in the developmental significance of parentification.父母化角色在发展中的意义存在种族差异。
Fam Process. 2014 Jun;53(2):267-87. doi: 10.1111/famp.12072. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
7
From parentification to parenthood: caregiving responsibilities in childhood and childbearing desire in young adulthood.从角色倒置到为人父母:童年时期的照料责任与青年时期的生育意愿。
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2025 Jan;43(1):4-18. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2023.2220356. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
8
Assessing family caregiving: a comparison of three retrospective parentification measures.评估家庭照料:三种回溯性家长化测量方法的比较。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Oct;38(4):653-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00258.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
9
Contextualizing Children's Caregiving Responses to Interparental Conflict: Advancing Assessment of Parentification.语境化儿童对父母冲突的照料反应:推进父母化评估。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Apr;35(3):276-287. doi: 10.1037/fam0000646.
10
Parentification and family responsibility in the family of origin of adult children of alcoholics.酗酒者成年子女原生家庭中的角色倒置与家庭责任
Addict Behav. 2007 Apr;32(4):675-85. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.010. Epub 2006 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Expanding and Extending the Role Reversal Construct in Early Childhood.扩展和延伸幼儿期角色反转的概念
J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Nov;28(11):3132-3145. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01490-w. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
2
Exploring effects of childhood parentification on adult-depressive symptoms in Korean college students.探讨童年时期父母化对韩国大学生成年期抑郁症状的影响。
J Clin Psychol. 2019 Apr;75(4):801-813. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22737. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
3
Linking testosterone and antisocial behavior in at-risk transitional aged youth: Contextual effects of parentification.将睾丸素与高危青春期过渡青年的反社会行为联系起来:家长化的情境影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 May;91:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Economic Recession, Alcohol, and Suicide Rates: Comparative Effects of Poverty, Foreclosure, and Job Loss.经济衰退、酒精与自杀率:贫困、止赎和失业的比较影响
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Apr;52(4):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.021. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Childhood adversities and risk for problematic alcohol use.童年逆境与酒精使用问题的风险
Addict Behav. 2016 Aug;59:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
MATERNAL ROLE CONFUSION: RELATIONS TO MATERNAL ATTACHMENT AND MOTHER-CHILD INTERACTION FROM INFANCY TO ADOLESCENCE.母亲角色混乱:从婴儿期到青春期与母婴依恋及母婴互动的关系
Infant Ment Health J. 2013 Mar;34(2):117-131. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21379.
7
Unemployment and substance outcomes in the United States 2002-2010.2002 - 2010年美国的失业情况与物质使用结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Sep 1;142:350-3. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
8
Ethnic differences in the developmental significance of parentification.父母化角色在发展中的意义存在种族差异。
Fam Process. 2014 Jun;53(2):267-87. doi: 10.1111/famp.12072. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
9
Children's Provision of Family Caregiving: Benefit or Burden?儿童提供家庭照料:是益处还是负担?
Child Dev Perspect. 2010 Apr;4(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00118.x.
10
Maternal history of parentification, maternal warm responsiveness, and children's externalizing behavior.母亲的养育史、母亲的温暖反应与儿童的外化行为。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Oct;26(5):767-75. doi: 10.1037/a0029470. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

波兰青少年中的亲子角色颠倒:一项患病率研究。

Parentification in Polish Adolescents: a Prevalence Study.

作者信息

Borchet Judyta, Hooper Lisa M, Tomek Sara, Schneider Wei S, Dębski Maciej

机构信息

University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

University of Northern Iowa, Center for Educational Transformation, Cedar Falls, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2021 Oct 25;15(3):567-583. doi: 10.1007/s40653-021-00411-8. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1007/s40653-021-00411-8
PMID:35958724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9360274/
Abstract

This study investigated the prevalence of parentification in a nationwide cross-sectional study. There were  = 47,984 Polish adolescents aged 12-21 ( = 15.60;  = 1.98; female 52.7%, male 47.3%). The results indicated that more adolescents experienced emotional parentification (toward parents 35.9%; toward siblings 25.2%) as compared to instrumental parentification (toward parents 7.2%; toward siblings 15.5%), which is noteworthy, since emotional parentification is the most detrimental form of parentification in USA samples. Overall, 15.5% of the participants reported a sense of injustice related to their family caregiving roles and 61.2% reported satisfaction related to their family caregiving roles. The results are important given the dearth of prevalence studies.

摘要

本研究在一项全国性横断面研究中调查了亲职化现象的普遍性。研究对象为47984名年龄在12至21岁之间的波兰青少年(平均年龄=15.60岁;标准差=1.98岁;女性占52.7%,男性占47.3%)。结果表明,与工具性亲职化(对父母为7.2%;对兄弟姐妹为15.5%)相比,更多青少年经历了情感性亲职化(对父母为35.9%;对兄弟姐妹为25.2%),这一点值得注意,因为在美国样本中,情感性亲职化是亲职化最有害的形式。总体而言,15.5%的参与者报告了与家庭照顾角色相关的不公正感,61.2%的参与者报告了对家庭照顾角色的满意度。鉴于患病率研究的匮乏,这些结果具有重要意义。